Methodological problems—Misleading interpretation of the results may result in misleading estimates of treatment effect comparisons between the interventions

Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie - Tập 79 - Trang 1075-1077 - 2020
G. Tripepi1
1CNR-IFC, Institute of Clinical Physiology of Reggio Calabria, Pisa, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Lee YH, Song GG (2020) Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Z Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-020-00796-1 Lee YH, Song GG (2020) Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-020-00750-1 Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B, Gruben D, Wallenstein G, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich SH (2013) Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:451–460 Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O et al (2016) Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 374:1243–1252 Cameron C, Hutton B, Druchok C et al (2018) Importance of assessing and adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis: a case study of psoriasis. J Comp Eff Res 7(11):1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0065 Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D et al (2017) Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 376:652–662 Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Mysler E, Bessette L, Peterfy C, Durez P, Ostor A, Li Y, Zhou Y, Othman AA (2018) A phase3, randomized, double blind study comparing upadacitinib to placebo and to adalimumab, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:1788–1800