Method for Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics for Sorghum bicolor L. Moench

Tropical Plant Biology - Tập 11 - Trang 78-91 - 2018
Anupama A. Sharan1,2,3, Ashwini N. Nikam4,5, Abdul Jaleel6, Vaijayanti A. Tamhane4, Srinivasa P. Rao1,7
1Research Program on Dryland Cereals (RPDC), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
2Department of Bio-Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India
3Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
4Institute of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology (IBB), Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
5Springer Nature, Pune, India
6Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (RGCB), Thiruvananthapuram, India
7Department of Microbiology and Cell Science University of Florida Gainesville USA

Tóm tắt

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is a rapidly emerging high biomass feedstock for bioethanol and lignocellulosic biomass production. The robust varietal germplasm of sorghum and its completed genome sequence provide the necessary genetic and molecular tools to study and engineer the biotic/abiotic stress tolerance. Traditional proteomics approaches for outlining the sorghum proteome have many limitations like, demand for high protein amounts, reproducibility and identification of only few differential proteins. In this study, we report a gel-free, quantitative proteomic method for in-depth coverage of the sorghum proteome. This novel method combining phenol extraction and methanol chloroform precipitation gives high total protein yields for both mature sorghum root and leaf tissues. We demonstrate successful application of this method in comparing proteomes of contrasting cultivars of sorghum, at two different phenological stages. Protein identification and relative quantification analyses were performed by a label-free liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) analyses. Several unique proteins were identified respectively from sorghum tissues, specifically 271 from leaf and 774 from root tissues, with 193 proteins common in both tissues. Using gene ontology analysis, the differential proteins identified were finely corroborated with their leaf/root tissue specific functions. This method of protein extraction and analysis would contribute substantially to generate in-depth differential protein data in sorghum as well as related species. It would also increase the repertoire of methods uniquely suited for gel-free plant proteomics that are increasingly being developed for studying abiotic and biotic stress responses.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdallah C, Dumas-Gaudot E, Renaut J (2012) Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance. Int J Plant Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/494572 Barkla B, Vera-Estrella R, Pantoja O (2013) Progress and challenges for abiotic stress proteomics of crop plants. Proteomics 13(12-13):1801–1815 Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1-2):248–254 Brown R, Audet J (2008) Current techniques for single-cell lysis. J Royal Soc 5(2):131–138 Campostrini N, Areces L, Rappsilber J (2005) Spot overlapping in two-dimensional maps: A serious problem ignored for much too long. Proteomics 5(9):2385–2395 Carpentier S, Witters E, Laukens K, Deckers P (2005) Preparation of protein extracts from recalcitrant plant tissues: An evaluation of different methods for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. Proteomics 5(10):2497–2507 Damerval C, De Vienne D, Zivy M (1986) Technical improvements in two-dimensional electrophoresis increase the level of genetic variation detected in wheat-seedling proteins. Electrophoresis 7(1):52–54 Handakumbura PP, Hixson KK, Purvine SO et al (2017) Plant iTRAQ-Based Proteomics. In: Stacey G, Birchler J, Ecker J et al (eds) Current Protocols in Plant Biology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 158–172 Isaacson T, Damasceno C, Saravanan R (2006) Sample extraction techniques for enhanced proteomic analysis of plant tissues. Nat Prot 1(2):769–774 Jedmowski C, Ashoub A, Beckhaus T (2014) Comparative analysis of Sorghum bicolor proteome in response to drought stress and following recovery. Int J Prot. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/395905 Malcevschi A, Marmiroli N (2012) Plant Protein Analysis. In: Petzold CJ (ed) Heazlewood, J.L. INTECH Open Access Publisher, Proteomic Applications in Biology, pp 117–142 Méchin V, Damerval C, Zivy M (2007) Total protein extraction with TCA-acetone. Plant proteomics Protoc 355:1 Ngara R, Ndimba R, Borch-Jensen J, Jensen O (2012) Identification and profiling of salinity stress-responsive proteins in Sorghum bicolor seedlings. J. Proteomics 75(13):4139–4150 Pavoković D, Križnik B, Krsnik-Rasol M (2012) Evaluation of protein extraction methods for proteomic analysis of non-model recalcitrant plant tissues. Croat Chem acta 85(2):177–183 Pirondini A, Visioli G, Malcevschi A (2006) A 2-D liquid-phase chromatography for proteomic analysis in plant tissues. J Chromatogr 833(1):91–100 Roy S, Kamal A, Kim H (2014) Proteome profiling of seed from inbred and mutant line of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Aus J Crop Sc. 8(4):606 Saravanan R, Rose J (2004) A critical evaluation of sample extraction techniques for enhanced proteomic analysis of recalcitrant plant tissues. Proteomics 4(9):2522–2532 Sharma V, Sekhwal M, Swami A, Sarin R (2012) Identification of drought responsive proteins using gene ontology hierarchy. Bioinformation 8(13):595 Shi J, Chen Y, Xu Y et al (2017) Differential Proteomic Analysis by iTRAQ Reveals the Mechanism of Pyropia haitanensis Responding to High Temperature Stress. Sci Rep 7:44734 Shoemaker C, Bransby D (2010) The role of sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock. Sustainable alternative fuel feedstock opportunities, challenges and roadmaps for six US regions, Proceeedings of the Sustainable Feedstocks for Advance Biofuels Workshop, Atlanta, GA, pp 28-30 Thomasson J, Hartley B, Gibson J (2009) Characteristics of High-Biomass Sorghum as a Biofuel. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting June 21-24 2009, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28044 Tuli L, Ressom H (2009) LC–MS based detection of differential protein expression. J Proteomics Bioinform 2:416 Wessel D, Flügge U (1984) A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal Biochem 138(1):141–143 Westermeier R, Marouga R (2005) Protein detection methods in proteomics research. Biosci Rep 25(1-2):19–32 Wu C, MacCoss M, Howell K (2003) A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Nature 21(5):532–538 Wu X, Xiong E, Wang W et al (2014) Universal sample preparation method integrating trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation with phenol extraction for crop proteomic analysis. Nat Protoc 9(2):362–374 Xie H, Yang D-H, Yao H et al (2016) iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals proteomic changes in leaves of cultivated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in response to drought stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 469:768–775 Yin H, Chen C, Yang J, Weston D (2014) Functional genomics of drought tolerance in bioenergy crops. Crit Rev 33(2-3):205–224 Zhou D, Yang Y, Zhang J et al (2016) Quantitative iTRAQ Proteomics Revealed Possible Roles for Antioxidant Proteins in Sorghum Aluminum Tolerance. Front Plant Sci 7:2043