Metanationality and telecommunications incumbency

Emerald - Tập 10 Số 4 - Trang 61-71 - 2008
ColinTurner1
1Senior Lecturer in International Strategic Management, School of Management, Heriot‐Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper sets out to recognise the complexity of the internationalisation process of telecommunications operators via an examination of the metanational forces influencing strategy of European incumbents. Thus as part of a broad strategy of strategic defence incumbents may seek to tap into metanational forces.Design/methodology/approachThe utilisation of metanational forces for the purposes of strategic defence was examined via a dual case analysis. These were chosen to reflect two different strategic scenarios. The first case (Belgacom) has a purely defensive strategy, while the second (Telefonica) has dual‐faceted strategy based on defence alongside a more offensive international strategy.FindingsAcross both of these cases, there was evidence of emergent metanational strategies. These incumbents accessed the global resource pool to retrieve or acquire skills, capabilities or resources that would aid the competitive positioning of incumbents within their home market. It was found that the strong market position aided their ability to gain access to “valuable” resources. This raises evident policy issues.Research limitations/implicationsA dual case analysis only offers a limited perspective on the influence of metanationality. However, the trend does highlight the increasingly complex nature of international strategy in telecommunications.Originality/valueThe value of the paper lies in understanding that the competitive advantage of incumbent operators can lie beyond their own national borders. This raises issues over the nature of strategic defence for incumbents in an increasingly internationalised marketplace.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing across Borders, The Transnational Solution, Century Business, London.

Belgacom (2003), Annual Report, available at: www.belgacom.net.

Belgacom (2004), Annual Report, available at: www.belgacom.net.

Belgacom (2005), Annual Report, available at: www.belgacom.net.

Belgacom (2006), Annual Report, available at: www.belgacom.net.

Birkinshaw, J. and Arvidsson, N. (2004), “Does the firm really know what it knows?”, in Hitt, M. and Cheng, J. (Eds), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 31‐42.

Bonardi, J.‐P. (2004), “Global and political strategies in deregulated industries: the asymmetric behaviours of former monopolies”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 101‐20.

Calof, J.L. and Beamish, P.W. (1995), “Adapting to foreign markets: explaining internationalisation”, International Business Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 115‐31.

Chandy, R.K. and Tellis, G.J. (2000), “The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, pp. 1‐17.

Commission of the European Communities (2007), European Electronic Communications Regulations and Markets 2006 (12th Report), COM (2007) 155, Brussels.

Craig, C.S. and Douglas, S.P. (2000), “Configural advantage in global markets”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 6‐25.

De Man, A. (2004), The Network Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Doz, Y., Santos, J. and Williamson, P. (2004), From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Dunning, J. (1996), “The geographical sources of competitiveness in firms: the results of a new survey”, Transnational Corporations, Vol. 5 No. 3.

European Information Technology Observatory (EITO) (2004), European Information Technology Observatory 2004, EITO, Frankfurt am Main.

Fahy, J. (2001), The Role of Resources in Global Competition, Routledge, London.

Fletcher, R. (2001), “A holistic approach to internationalisation”, International Business Review, Vol. 10, pp. 25‐49.

Fransmann, M. (2002), Telecommunications in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust to…?, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Inkpen, A.C. (2004), “Yves Doz and international management”, in Hitt, M. and Cheng, J. (Eds), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 43‐52.

Kogut, B. (1985), “Designing global strategies: comparative and competitive value chains”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 15‐28.

Makhija, M. and Shenkar, O. (2004), “National context and the metanational perspective in international strategy”, in Hitt, M. and Cheng, J. (Eds), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 67‐82.

Markides, C. and Geroski, P. (2005), Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Office of Communications (2004), The Communications Market 2004, available at: www.ofcom.gov.uk.

Peng, M. (2001), “The resource based view and international business”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27, pp. 803‐29.

Porter, M. (1986), “Competition in global industries: a conceptual framework”, in Porter, M. (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 15‐60.

Telefonica (2005), Annual Report 2004, available at: www.telefonica.es.

Telefonica (2006), Annual Report 2005, available at: www.telefonica.es.

Telefonica (2007), Annual Report 2006, available at: www.telefonica.es.

Welch, L. and Luostarinen, R. (1992), “Inward‐outward connections in internationalisation”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 44‐56.

Belgacom (2007), Annual Report, available at: www.belgacom.net.

Chandy, K. and Tellis, G. (1998), “Organizing for radical product innovation”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXV, November, pp. 474‐87.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 10 Số 4

61-71

Thông tin tác giả