Metal and motion artifacts by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental and maxillofacial study

Cosimo Nardi1, Claudio Borri1, Francesco Regini1, Linda Calistri1, A. Castellani1, Chiara Lorini2, Stefano Colagrande1
1Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
2Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Horner K, Armitt G, Bannard M Radiation Protection: Cone Beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence Based Guidelines 2011. http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines_final.pdf . Accessed December 2014

Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691

Perrella A, Lopes PML, Rocha RG, Fenyo-Pereira M, Cavalcanti MG (2010) Influence of dental metallic artifact from multislice CT in the assessment of simulated mandibular lesions. J Appl Oral Sci 18:149–154

Svendsen P, Quiding L, Landhl I (1980) Blackout and other artefacts in computed tomography caused by fillings in teeth. Neuroradiology 19:229–234

Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I (2005) Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 66:434–444

Chindasombatjareon J, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Maeda Y, Furukawa S (2011) Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metals: comparison of cone-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners. Oral Radiol 27:114–120

Cremonini CC, Dumas M, Pannuti CM, Neto JB, Cavalcanti MG, Lima LA (2011) Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:845–850

Esmaeili F, Johari M, Haddadi P (2013) Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners. Dent Res J 10:376–381

Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 75:265–269

Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part II. On 3-D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol 75:270–274

Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T (2011) A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 77:397–402

Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental cbct devices and 64-slice ct for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:106–114

Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M (2009) Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:367–378

Chau AC, Fung K (2009) Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:559–565

Mischkowski RA, Scherer P, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Keeve E, Zoller JE (2008) Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 37:1–9

Alamri HM, Sadrameli M, Alshalhoob MA, Sadrameli M, Alshehri MA (2012) Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature. Gen Dent 60:390–400

Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C et al (2014) Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 15:20140197

Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y et al (2009) Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:79–85

Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81:267–271

Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A: 1:612–619

Spin-Neto R, Mudrak J, Matzen LH, Christensen J, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A (2013) Cone Beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:32310645

Donaldson K, O’Connor S, Heath N (2013) Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:91866873

Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D et al (2011) Artifacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:265–273

Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim JS (2007) Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc 35:850–857

Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M et al (2006) Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:652–657

Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H et al (2011) Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Impl Res 100:94–99

Naitoh M, Saburi K, Gotoh K, Kurita K, Ariji E (2013) Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT. Implant Dent 22:151–154

Schulze RK, Berndt D, d’Hoedt B (2010) On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:100–107

Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Jung RE, Deyhle H, Hammerle CH (2013) In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res 24:378–383

Esmaeili F, Johari M, Haddadi P, Vatankhah M (2012) Beam hardening artifacts: comparison between two cone beam computed tomography scanners. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 6:49–53

Hunter A, McDavid D (2009) Analyzing the beam hardening artifact in the Planmeca Promax. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:28–29

Colagrande S, Origgi D, Zatelli G, Giovagnoni A, Salerno S (2014) CT exposure in adult and paediatric patients: a review of the mechanisms of damage, relative dose and consequent possible risks. Radiol Med 119:803–810

Rottke D, Schulze D. NewTom 5G dose study 2013. http://www.newtom.it . Accessed December 2014

Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A (2013) Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:20120443

Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J (2008) Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:10–17

Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F et al (2008) Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:309–318

Kim S, Song H, Samei E, Yin FF, Yoshizumi TT (2011) Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 12:3395

Rumboldt Z, Huda W, All JW (2009) Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner. Am J Neuroradiol 30:1630–1636

Bianchi SD, Rampado O, Luberto L, Genovesio AF, Bianchi CC, Ropolo R (2005) Image quality analysis and low dose dental CT. Int Congr Ser 1281:1177–1181