Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures

English for Specific Purposes - Tập 37 - Trang 52-62 - 2015
Joseph J. Lee1, Nicholas C. Subtirelu2
1English Language Improvement Program, Department of Linguistics, Ohio University, 383 Gordy Hall, Athens, OH 45701, USA
2Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4099, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ädel, 2010, Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9, 69, 10.35360/njes.218 Ädel, 2010, Special issue: Metadiscourse, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 Anthony, 2011 Basturkmen, 2009 Biber, 2006 Breen, 2001, Navigating the discourse: On what is learned in the language classroom, 306 Charles, 2013, English for academic purposes, 137 Chaudron, 1986, The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures, Applied Linguistics, 7, 113, 10.1093/applin/7.2.113 Cheng, 2011, ESP classroom research: Basic considerations and future research questions, 44 Cheng, 2012, “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 234, 10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004 Crawford Camiciottoli, 2005, Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 183, 10.1016/j.esp.2004.05.002 Crismore, 1989 Flowerdew, 1992, Definitions in science lectures, Applied Linguistics, 13, 202, 10.1093/applin/13.2.202 Flowerdew, 1995, The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 435, 10.1017/S0272263100014406 Fortanet, 2004, The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: References and function, English for Specific Purposes, 23, 45, 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00018-8 Hamp-Lyons, 2004, Some further thoughts on EAP and JEAP, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 1, 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.10.001 Hyland, 2004, Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 Hyland, 2005 Hyland, 2006 Hyland, 2009 Hyland, 2010, Metadiscourse. Mapping interactions in academic writing, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9, 125, 10.35360/njes.220 Hyland, 2004, Metadiscourse in academic writing. A reappraisal, Applied Linguistics, 25, 156, 10.1093/applin/25.2.156 Institute of International Education (IIE), 2013 Jung, 2006, Misunderstanding of academic monologues by nonnative speakers of English, Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1928, 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.05.001 Lee, 2009, Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions, English for Specific Purposes, 28, 42, 10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001 Lee, 2011 Lin, 2012, Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A matter of academic cultures or lecturing styles?, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 117, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003 Lindemann, 2001, “It’s just real messy”: The occurrence of function of just in a corpus of academic speech, English for Specific Purposes, 20, 459, 10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00026-6 Mauranen, 1993, Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economic texts, English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3, 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I Mauranen, 2010, Discourse reflexivity – A discourse universal?, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9, 13, 10.35360/njes.216 Morell, 2004, Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students, English for Specific Purposes, 23, 325, 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00029-2 Morell, 2007, What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 222, 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002 Poos, 2002, Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging, 3 R Core Team, 2013 Schiffrin, 1980, Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 199, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x Simpson, 2002 Strodt-Lopez, 1991, Tying it all in: Asides in university lectures, Applied Linguistics, 12, 117, 10.1093/applin/12.2.117 Swales, 2001, Metatalk in American academic talk: The cases of “point” and “thing”, Journal of English Linguistics, 29, 34, 10.1177/00754240122005189 Thompson, 2001, Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader, Applied Linguistics, 22, 58, 10.1093/applin/22.1.58 Thompson, 1994, Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions, English for Specific Purposes, 13, 171, 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90014-0 Thompson, 2003, Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 5, 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-X Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 26, 82, 10.2307/357609 Walsh, 2011