Meta‐analysis: the effect of probiotic administration on antibiotic‐associated diarrhoea

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics - Tập 16 Số 8 - Trang 1461-1467 - 2002
Filippo Cremonini1, Simona Di1, E.C. Nista1, Francesco Bartolozzi2, Giovanni Capelli2, Giovanni Gasbarrini1, Antonio Gasbarrini1
1Internal Medicine Department, Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy; and
2Hygiene and Public Health Department, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

Tóm tắt

SUMMARY

Background : Antibiotic‐associated diarrhoea can be attributed in part to imbalances in intestinal microflora. Therefore, probiotic preparations are used to prevent this diarrhoea. However, although several trials have been conducted, no conclusive evidence has been found of the efficacy of different preparations, e.g. Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces spp.

Aim : To conduct a meta‐analysis of the data in the literature on the efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of antibiotic‐associated diarrhoea.

Methods : A literature search was performed of electronic databases, Abstract Books and single paper references. Data were also obtained from the authors. Only placebo‐controlled studies were included in the search. The Mantel–Haenszel test was used to estimate the relative risk for single studies and an overall combined relative risk, each study being submitted to the Mantel–Haenszel test for homogeneity.

Results : Twenty‐two studies matched the inclusion criteria. Only seven studies (881 patients) were homogeneous. The combined relative risk was 0.3966 (95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.57).

Conclusions : The results suggest a strong benefit of probiotic administration on antibiotic‐associated diarrhoea, but further data are needed. The evidence for beneficial effects is still not definitive. Published studies are flawed by the lack of a placebo design and by peculiar population features.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1079/BJN19980108

Snyder JD, 1982, The magnitude of the global problem of acute diarrheal disease: a review of active surveillance data, Bull WHO, 60, 605

Finegold SM, 1970, Interaction of antimicrobial therapy and intestinal flora, Am J Clin Nutr, 23, 1466, 10.1093/ajcn/23.11.1466

10.1093/clind/15.4.573

10.1016/S0002-9270(99)00808-4

10.1136/gut.22.1.34

10.1001/jama.203.3.210

10.1136/gut.42.1.2

Isolauri E, 2001, Probiotics: effects on immunity, Am J Clin Nutr, 73, S444, 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.444s

Erickson KL, 2000, Probiotic immunomodulation in health and disease, J Nutr, 130, S403, 10.1093/jn/130.2.403S

10.1001/jama.262.15.2101

10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70053-3

10.1016/0016-5085(89)91613-2

10.1016/S0163-4453(98)80008-X

10.1542/peds.104.5.e64

Gotz V, 1979, Prophylaxis against ampicillin‐associated diarrhea with Lactobacillus preparation, Am J Hosp Pharm, 36, 754

McFarland LV, 1995, Prevention of beta‐lactam‐associated diarrhea by Saccharomyces boulardii compared with placebo, Am J Gastroenterol, 90, 439

10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00923.x

Mantel N, 1959, Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease, J Natl Cancer Inst, 22, 719

10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

10.1002/sim.4780101105

Egger M, 1998, Meta‐analysis software, Br Med J, 316, 7126

10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61

10.1099/00221287-138-8-1689

10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00033-6

Bezkorovainy A, 2001, Probiotics: determinants of survival and growth in the gut, Am J Clin Nutr, 73, S399, 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.399s

10.1016/S0002-9270(99)00813-8

Kim PH, 1998, Bifidobacterium is a strong stimulant for IgA antibody production by mucosal B lymphocytes, FASEB J, 12, A5278(Abstract

10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76659-0

Wollowski I, 2001, Protective role of probiotics and prebiotics in colon cancer, Am J Clin Nutr, 73, S451, 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.451s

10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00973.x

10.1016/0016-5085(93)91059-Q

10.1053/gast.2000.9370

10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00560.x

10.1017/S0007114500006085

10.1136/bmj.316.7126.221

10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574

10.1053/gast.2000.9866