Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited

Contemporary Clinical Trials - Tập 45 - Trang 139-145 - 2015
Rebecca DerSimonian1, Nan M. Laird2
1National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
2Harvard University, TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

DerSimonian, 1986, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Control. Clin. Trials, 7, 177, 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Glass, 1976, Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educ. Res., 5, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003

Rosenthal, 1978, Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies, Behav. Brain Sci., 1, 377, 10.1017/S0140525X00075506

Mosteller, 1995, The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades, Futur. Child., 5, 113, 10.2307/1602360

Mosteller, 1996, Sustaining inquiry in education: lessons from skill grouping and class size, Harv. Educ. Rev., 66, 797, 10.17763/haer.66.4.36m328762x21610x

Slack, 1980, The scholastic aptitude test: a critical appraisal, Harv. Educ. Rev., 66, 1

DerSimonian, 1983, Evaluating the effect of coaching on SAT scores: a meta-analysis, Harv. Educ. Rev., 53, 1, 10.17763/haer.53.1.n06j5h5356217648

Board, 1999, Research notes: coaching and the SAT® I

Cochran, 1954, The combination of estimates from different experiments, Biometrics, 10, 101, 10.2307/3001666

DerSimonian, 2007, Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update, Contemp. Clin. Trials, 28, 105, 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004

Jackson, 2010, How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient by harder to compute counterparts?, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 140, 961, 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.017

Kontopantelis, 2012, Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: a simulation study, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 21, 409, 10.1177/0962280210392008

Kontopantelis, 2012, Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: a comparison between DerSimonian-Laird and restricted maximum likelihood, Stat. Methods Med. Res., 21, 657, 10.1177/0962280211413451

Jackson, 2010, Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random-effects meta-analyses, Stat. Med., 29, 1282, 10.1002/sim.3602

Jackson, 2013, A matrix-based method of moments for fitting the multivariate random effects model for meta-analysis and meta-regression, Biom. J., 55, 231, 10.1002/bimj.201200152

Chen, 2012, A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis, Biometrics, 68, 1278, 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01761.x

Biggerstaff, 2008, The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis, Stat. Med., 27, 6093, 10.1002/sim.3428

Kulinskaya, 2011, On the moments of Cochran's Q statistic under the null hypothesis, with application to the meta-analysis of risk difference, Res. Synth. Methods, 2, 254, 10.1002/jrsm.54

Kulinskaya, 2011, Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference, Biometrics, 67, 203, 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01442.x

Jackson, 2014, Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models, BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14, 103, 10.1186/1471-2288-14-103

Jackson, 2013, Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalized Cochran heterogeneity statistics, Res. Synth. Methods., 4, 220, 10.1002/jrsm.1081

Higgins, 2002, Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis, Stat. Med., 21, 1539, 10.1002/sim.1186

Berkey, 1995, A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis, Stat. Med., 14, 395, 10.1002/sim.4780140406

Thompson, 2002, How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?, Stat. Med., 21, 1559, 10.1002/sim.1187

IntHout, 2014, The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method, BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14, 25, 10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

Han, 2011, Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 88, 586, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014

Sidik, 2005, A note on variance estimation on random effects meta-regression, J. Biopharm. Stat., 15, 823, 10.1081/BIP-200067915

Laird, 1990, Some statistical methods for combining experimental results, Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 6, 5, 10.1017/S0266462300008916

Hartung, 2001, A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome, Stat. Med., 20, 3875, 10.1002/sim.1009

Lin, 2010, Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies: no efficiency gain in using individual participant data, Genet. Epidemiol., 34, 60, 10.1002/gepi.20435

Heid, 2009, Meta-analysis of the INSIG2 association with obesity including 74,345 individuals: does heterogeneity of estimates relate to study design?, PLoS Genet., 5, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694

Herbert, 2006, A common genetic variant is associated with adult and childhood obesity, Science, 312, 279, 10.1126/science.1124779