Merkel cell carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and treatment parameters of prognostic significance

Journal of Radiation Oncology - Tập 5 - Trang 205-212 - 2016
Michael A. Fu1, Evan C. Osmundson2,3, Rie von Eyben2, Susan J. Knox2, Daniel S. Kapp2
1Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, USA

Tóm tắt

We aimed to define the impact of patient, tumor, surgical, and radiotherapy (RT) treatment parameters on Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) recurrence and survival. The study was a retrospective review of 45 patients with primary disease evaluated between 1981 and 2012 at a single U.S. institution and treated with curative intent. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage was I in 42.2 %, II in 8.9 %, III in 26.7 %, and unknown in 22.2 %. 95.6 % underwent primary lesion excision and 69.8 % received adjuvant RT to the tumor bed. Regional management included sentinel lymph node biopsy (35.6 %) and lymph node dissection (28.9 %) with adjuvant RT in 11.1 % and 13.3 %, respectively. 24 patients recurred, mostly at locoregional (LR) (50.0 %) and distant (41.7 %) sites. Only one in-field recurrence occurred after primary site RT. In univariate analysis, RT was associated with reduced (p = 0.003) and head and neck tumors with increased (p = 0.01) risk of LR recurrence. Higher AJCC and nodal stage patients were more likely to receive nodal dissection (p < 0.01) and had a decreased risk of LR recurrence (p < 0.05), but had a median survival time that was nearly half that of lower stage patients. No tested RT parameter was associated with outcomes. Our study supports the efficacy of RT in improving LR control in MCC compared to excision alone and emphasizes the importance of surgical nodal evaluation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hodgson NC (2005) Merkel cell carcinoma: changing incidence trends. J Surg Oncol 89(1):1–4. doi:10.1002/jso.20167 Prieto Munoz I, Pardo Masferrer J, Olivera Vegas J, Medina Montalvo MS, et al. (2013) Merkel cell carcinoma from 2008 to 2012: reaching a new level of understanding. Cancer Treat Rev 39(5):421–429. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.009 Koljonen V, Kukko H, Pukkala E, Sankila R, et al. (2009) Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients have a high risk of Merkel-cell polyomavirus DNA-positive Merkel-cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 101(8):1444–1447. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605306 Lanoy E, Engels EA (2010) Skin cancers associated with autoimmune conditions among elderly adults. Br J Cancer 103(1):112–114. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605733 Heath M, Jaimes N, Lemos B, Mostaghimi A, et al. (2008) Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features. J Am Acad Dermatol 58(3):375–381. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.11.020 Bichakjian C, Olencki T, et al. (2014) Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:410–424 Jouary T, Leyral C, Dreno B, Doussau A, et al. (2012) Adjuvant prophylactic regional radiotherapy versus observation in stage I Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentric prospective randomized study. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 23(4):1074–1080. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr318 Foote M, Harvey J, Porceddu S, Dickie G, et al. (2010) Effect of radiotherapy dose and volume on relapse in Merkel cell cancer of the skin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(3):677–684. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.067 Lewis KG, Weinstock MA, Weaver AL, Otley CC (2006) Adjuvant local irradiation for Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 142(6):693–700. doi:10.1001/archderm.142.6.693 Chen MM, Roman SA, Sosa JA, Judson BL (2015) The role of adjuvant therapy in the management of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: an analysis of 4815 patients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(2):137–141. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.3052 Hasan S, Liu L, Triplet J, Li Z, et al. (2013) The role of postoperative radiation and chemoradiation in merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in oncology 3:276. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00276 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (2014) Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), Rev. ed. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute 9:7473 Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR (1995) Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II Accuracy and precision of regression estimates Journal of clinical epidemiology 48(12):1503–1510 Kachare SD, Wong JH, Vohra NA, Zervos EE, et al. (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved survival in Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21(5):1624–1630. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3434-3 Mehrany K, Otley CC, Weenig RH, Phillips PK, et al. (2002) A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node status in Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatologic surgery: official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al] 28(2):113–117 discussion 117 Kokoska ER, Kokoska MS, Collins BT, Stapleton DR, et al. (1997) Early aggressive treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma improves outcome. Am J Surg 174(6):688–693 Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF, Panageas KS, et al. (2012) Recurrence after complete resection and selective use of adjuvant therapy for stage I through III Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer 118(13):3311–3320. doi:10.1002/cncr.26626 Lemos BD, Storer BE, Iyer JG, Phillips JL, et al. (2010) Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(5):751–761. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.056 Tseng J, Dhungel B, Mills JK, Diggs BS, et al. (2015) Merkel cell carcinoma: what makes a difference? Am J Surg 209(2):342–346. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.013 Rao P, Balzer BL, Lemos BD, Liegeois NJ, et al. (2010) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 134(3):341–344. doi:10.1043/1543-2165-134.3.341 Zager JS, Messina JL, Glass LF, Sondak VK (2014) Unanswered questions in the management of stage I–III Merkel cell carcinoma. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN 12(3):425–431 quiz 431 Moshiri AS, Nghiem P (2014) Milestones in the staging, classification, and biology of Merkel cell carcinoma. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN 12(9):1255–1262 Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Merkel Cell Cancer (2016) Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02267603 Patnaik A, Kang SP, Rasco D, Papadopoulos KP, et al. (2015) Phase I study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2607