Merging top‐down and bottom‐up approaches in marine protected areas planning: experiences from around the globe
Tóm tắt
Five case studies from around the world illustrate key lessons in integrating top‐down and bottom‐up approaches to stakeholder and community engagement in the planning and implementation of marine protected areas (MPAs). Community resistance to MPA proposals from centralized agencies can be addressed through effective participatory processes with consistent engagement over time, transparency, and the incorporation of benefits for communities. Indigenous communities in particular are becoming key actors of some conservation initiatives (e.g. MPAs) and recognition of their inherent rights, traditional knowledge and deep connections to the marine environment can become the foundations for collaborative management of MPAs. True participation requires empowerment for engagement, and this in turn requires education and capacity building for local people to get involved in the process of planning, implementing, and managing MPAs. How bottom‐up and top‐down approaches are used should consider the scale of the MPA (e.g. small vs. large), the geographic scenario (e.g. coastal vs. remote), the level of anthropogenic influence, the conservation objectives (e.g. species, habitats, ecosystems), the political and governance context, and specific cultural conditions, such as the presence of indigenous communities.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
BertzkyB CorriganC KemseyJ KenneyS RaviliousC BesançonC BurgessN.2012.Protected Planet Report 2012: tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN Gland Switzerland and UNEP‐WCMC Cambridge UK.
Campbell R, 1999, Mito y realidad de Rapanui: la cultura de la Isla de Pascua
Chauvet S, 1946, La Isla de Pascua y sus Misterios
Defra.2010.Guidance on selection and designation of Marine Conservation Zones (Note 1). Defra London.http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/biodiversity/marine/documents/guidance‐note1.pdf[Accessed March 2014].
Englert S, 1974, La tierra de Hotu Matu'a: historia y etnología de la Isla de Pascua
Environment Canada.2010.Scott Islands marine National Wildlife Area Advisory Group Terms of Reference. Unpublished.
Environment Canada.2012.Scott Islands marine National Wildlife Area Advisory Group Meeting summary. March 26–27 2012 unpublished.
FriedlanderAM PoepoeK HelmK BartramP MaragosJ AbbottI.2000.Application of Hawaiian traditions to community‐based fishery management.Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium Bali Indonesia.
GaymerCF TapiaC AcuñaE AburtoJ CárcamoPF BodiniA StotzW.2013.Base de conocimiento y construcción de capacidades para el uso sustentable de los ecosistemas y recursos marinos de la ecorregión de Isla de Pascua. Informe Final Proyecto SUBPESCA Licitación No 4728‐33‐LE12.
Gelcich S, 2011, Biodiversity Conservation in the Americas: Lessons and Policy Recommendations, 199
Gwaii Haanas Marine Agreement.2010.Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of the Environment for the purposes of the Parks Canada Agency and the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans (‘Government of Canada’) and The Haida Nation as represented by the Council of the Haida Nation (‘Council of the Haida Nation’).
JonesPJS QiuW De SantoEM.2011.Governing Marine Protected Areas ‐ Getting the Balance Right. Technical Report United Nations Environment Programme.
JupiterS MillsM ComleyJ BatibasagaA JenkinsA.2010.Fiji marine ecological gap assessment: interim progress report. Wildlife Conservation Society Suva Fiji.
LieberknechtLM QiuW JonesPJS.2013.Celtic Sea Case Study Governance Analysis: Finding Sanctuary and England's Marine Conservation Zone process. Summary and Recommendations. MESMA Work package 6. University College of London Department of Geography.
Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee.2010.Marine Conservation Zone Project–Ecological Network Guidance.http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/100705_ENG_v10.pdf[Accessed March 2014].
Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument.2008.Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument Management Plan.
Pollock DE, 1992, Palaeoceanography and speciation in the spiny lobster genus Panulirus in the Indo‐Pacific, Bulletin of Marine Science, 51, 135
PomeranceC SegalA AnkersenT BroadwellA DavidsonG IernaJ NovemberJ.2013.Long Island Bahamas Stakeholder Engagement to Determine Local Interest in Enhanced Resource Management. Conservation Clinic at the University of Florida Levin College of Law Ocean Crest Alliance Coastal Ocean Association of Science and Technology (COAST).
Rodway MS, 2011, Use of permanent plots to monitor trends in burrow‐nesting seabird populations in British Columbia, Marine Ornithology, 39, 243
VegaC.2011.Criterios que Guiaron la Declaración de las Áreas Marinas Protegidas en el Norte de Chile. Marine Biology Honours Thesis. Universidad Católica del Norte Chile.
VeitayakiJ AalbersbergB TawakeA RupeniE TabunakawaiK.2003.Mainstreaming Resource Conservation: The Fiji Locally Managed Marine Area Network and its Influence on National Policy Development. Australian National University Canberra Australia.
Wilhelm TA, 2014, Large marine protected areas – advantages and challenges of going big, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4, 25