Mediation of an Efficacious HIV Risk Reduction Intervention for South African Men

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 19 - Trang 1842-1849 - 2015
Ann O’Leary1, John B. Jemmott2, Loretta S. Jemmott2, Scarlett Bellamy2, Larry D. Icard3, Zolani Ngwane4
1Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
3Temple University, Philadelphia, USA
4Haverford College, Haverford, USA

Tóm tắt

“Men, Together Making a Difference!” is an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention that significantly increased self-reported consistent condom use during vaginal intercourse compared with a health-promotion attention-control intervention among men (N = 1181) in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. The present analyses were designed to identify mediators of the intervention’s efficacy. The potential mediators were Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) constructs that the intervention targeted, including several aspects of condom-use self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and knowledge. Mediation was assessed using a product-of-coefficients approach where an α path (the intervention’s effect on the potential mediator) and a β path (the potential mediator’s effect on the outcome of interest, adjusting for intervention) were estimated independently in a generalized estimating equations framework. Condom-use negotiation self-efficacy, technical-skill self-efficacy, and impulse-control self-efficacy were significant mediators. Although not mediators, descriptive norm and expected friends’ approval of condom use predicted subsequent self-reported condom use, whereas the expected approval of sexual partner did not. The present results suggest that HIV/STD risk-reduction interventions that draw upon SCT and that address self-efficacy to negotiate condom use, to apply condoms correctly, and to exercise sufficient control when sexually aroused to use condoms may contribute to efforts to reduce sexual risk behavior among South African men. Future research must examine whether approaches that build normative support for condom use among men’s friends are also efficacious.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83–104. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986. National Institute of Mental Health Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group. Social-cognitive theory mediators of behavior change in the National Institute of Mental Health Multisite HIV Prevention Trial. Health Psychol. 2001;20(5):369–76. Sanderson CA, Jemmott JB 3rd. Moderation and mediation of HIV prevention interventions: relationship status, intentions, and condom use among college students. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;26:2076–99. Fishbein M, Hennessy M, Kamb M, et al. Using intervention theory to model factors influencing behavior change. Project RESPECT. Eval Health Prof. 2001;24(4):363–84. O’Leary A, Hoff CC, Purcell DW, et al. What happened in the SUMIT trial? Mediation and behavior change. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S111–21. O’Leary A, Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB 3rd. Mediation analysis of an effective sexual risk-reduction intervention for women: the importance of self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 2008;27(2 Suppl):S180–4. O’Leary A, Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, et al. Moderation and mediation of an effective HIV risk-reduction intervention for South African adolescents. Ann Behav Med. 2012;44(2):181–91. Baumler E, Glassman J, Tortolero S, et al. Examination of the relationship between psychosocial mediators and intervention effects in It’s Your Game: an effective HIV/STI/pregnancy prevention intervention for middle school students. AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:298494. Sales JM, Lang DL, DiClemente RJ, Latham TP, Wingood GM, Hardin JW, Rose ES. The mediating role of partner communication frequency on condom use among African American adolescent females participating in an HIV prevention intervention. Health Psychol. 2012;31(1):63–9. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, O’Leary A, Ngwane Z, Icard LD, Heeren GA, Mtose X, Carty C. Cluster-randomized controlled trial of an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for South African men. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):467–73. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Ngwane Z, Zhang J, Heeren GA, Icard LD, O’Leary A, Mtose X, Teitelman A, Carty C. Theory-based behavioral intervention increases physical activity in South African men: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014;. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.012. O’Leary A, Wolitski RJ, Remien RH, Woods WJ, Parsons JT, Moss S, Lyles CM. Psychosocial correlates of transmission risk behavior among HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S67–75. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1529–36. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Fong GT, McCaffree K. Reducing HIV risk-associated sexual behavior among African American adolescents: testing the generality of intervention effects. Am J Commun Psychol. 1999;27(2):161–87. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Braverman PK, Fong GT. HIV/STD risk reduction interventions for African American and Latino adolescent girls at an adolescent medicine clinic: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(5):440–9. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Taylor and Francis Group; 2010. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, Hacker CI. Predicting intentions to use condoms among African-American adolescents: the theory of planned behavior as a model of HIV risk-associated behavior. Ethn Dis. 1992;2(4):371–80. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252(14):1905–7. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar Behav Res. 2004;39(1):99–128. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. New York: Wiley; 2004. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227. Jemmott JB 3rd, Jemmott LS, O’Leary A, Ngwane Z, Icard LD, Bellamy SL, Jones S, Landis JR, Heeron GA, Tyler J, Makiwane MB. School-based randomized controlled trial of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for South African adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(10):923–9. Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB 3rd, Ngwane Z, Icard LD, O’Leary A, Gueits L, Brawner B. “Let Us Protect Our Future!” A culturally congruent evidenced-based HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for young South African adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2013;. doi:10.1093/her/cyt072. Weinstein ND. Misleading tests of health behavior theories. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(1):1–10. O’Leary A. Preventing HIV infection in heterosexual women: what do we know? What do we need to learn? Appl Prev Psychol. 1999;8:257–63. UNAIDS (2010) Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/global_report.htm.