Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM

Dental Materials Journal - Tập 33 Số 5 - Trang 705-710 - 2014
Sasipin Lauvahutanon1,2, Hidekazu Takahashi2, Maho Shiozawa3, Nozomu Iwasaki2, Yuya Asakawa2, Meiko Oki4, Werner Finger5, Mansuang Arksornnukit1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
2Oral Biomaterials Engineering, Department of Oral Materials Sciences and Technology, Course for Oral Health Engineering, School of Oral Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
3Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
4Comprehensive Oral Health Engineering, Department of Fundamental Oral Health Engineering, Course for Oral Health Engineering, School of Oral Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
5Liaison Center for Innovative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1) Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 389-404.

2) Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 14S-21S.

3) Fuster-Torres MA, Albalat-Estela S, Alcañiz-Raya M, Peñarrocha-Diago M. CAD/CAM dental systems in implant dentistry: Update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: E141-145.

4) Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 7S-13S.

5) Giordano R, Cima M, Pober R. Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 311-319.

6) Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010; 31: 682-700.

7) Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 199-207.

8) Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-A retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 9-17.

9) Klink A, Huettig F. Complication and survival of Mark II restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 272-276.

10) Vichi A, Sedda M, Del Siena F, Louca C. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 1: Chairside materials. Am J Dent 2013; 26: 255-259.

11) ISO 6872: 2008. Dentistry — Ceramic materials, 3rd ed, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2008.

12) Paradigm<sup>TM</sup> MZ100 Block: Technical Product Profile. St. Paul, MN: 3M ESPE; 2000.

13) Takahashi H, Finger WJ, Endo T, Kanehira M, Koottathape N, Komatsu M, Balkenhol M. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am J Dent 2011; 24: 264-270.

14) Suh BI. New concepts and technology for processing of indirect composites. Compend Contin Educ dent 2003; 24: 40-42.

15) Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. <i>In vitro</i> aging of dental composites in water-Effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 465-472.

16) Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529-534.

17) Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspects of CAD/CAM composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 273-275.

18) Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 419-426.

19) Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 564-569.

20) ISO 1172: 1996. Textile-glass-reinforced plastics. Prepregs, moulding compounds and laminates. Determination of the textile glass and mineral-filler content. Calcination methods, 2nd ed, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1996.

21) ISO 4049: 2009. Dentistry — Polymer-based restorative materials, 4th ed, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2009.

22) Takahashi H, Nakano F, Tonami K, Nakazato T, Kurosaki N, Kitazaki H, Babazono K, Nishimura F. Effect of the test methods on flexural properties of dental restorative materials. J J Dent Mater 1999; 18: 395-400.

23) Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Weihs TP. Hardness and Young’s modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41: 9-13.

24) Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46: 173-183.

25) He LH, Swain MV. Nanoindentation derived stress-strain properties of dental materials. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 814-821.

26) Druck CC, Pozzobon JL, Callegari GL, Dorneles LS, Valandro LF. Adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic: Study of silica nanofilm coating on the surface of Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res Part B DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33184

27) Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 386-395.

28) Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. <i>In vitro</i> wear, hardness, and conversion of diacetyl-containing and propanal-containing resin materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 103-108.

29) Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011; 4: 237-244.

30) Sedda M, Vichi A, Del Siena F, Louca C, Ferrari M. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: Outsourcing materials. Am J Dent 2014; 27: 17-22.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Dental Materials Journal

Tập 33 Số 5

705-710

Thông tin tác giả