Mechanical behavior of buildings subjected to impulsive motions
Tóm tắt
This article analyses the response of steel-moment resisting frames subjected to near-field ground motions. In near-field areas high damage and a relevant number of collapsed steel buildings arose even when both design and detailing had been performed in perfect accordance with the code provisions. These circumstances are related to the characteristics of the motion that in such areas shows large-amplitude pulses along the fault-normal component. The response of two steel moment resisting frames characterized by different stiffness levels and subjected to seven different accelerograms recorded in stations located in near-field areas is discussed in the following. The frames have been also analyzed by modelling the real behavior of semi-rigid joints between beams and columns and taking into account the presence of passive dampers (shear link devices). The non-linear dynamic analysis has been performed with the aim of acquiring a quantitative knowledge on the effects of near-field ground motions on frame buildings and on their damage.
Tài liệu tham khảo
ACI committee 318 (2014) ACI 318-14: building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, 0–520. ISBN: 9780870319303
Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthq Eng and Struct Dyn 33(6):687–706
Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1486–1501
Bommer J, Georgallides G, Tromans IJ (2001) Is there a near-field for small-to-moderate magnitude earthquakes? J Earthq Eng 5(3):395–423
Chais X, Bozzo LM, Torres L, Foti D (1997) An energy dissipating devices for seismic protection of masonry. In: Proceedings of the 8° Convegno Nazionale L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Taormina, 21–24 September, pp 1005–1011
Chais X, Torres L, Bozzo L (2000) An innovative elasto-plastic energy dissipater for the structural and non-structural building protection. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; Auckland, New Zeland, 30 January–4 February
Chais X, Bozzo L, Torres L, Foti D (2001) Experimental tests on hybrid, semi-active and passive devices for seismic risk mitigation. In: Report n°7, ISMES, Ed. Giorgio Franchioni Rew. R.T. Severn, C. Taylor, Part 2
Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001a) Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:1769–1789
Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001b) Drift spectrum vs. modal analysis of structural response to near-fault ground motions. Earthq Spectra 17(2):221–234
Di Sarno L, Elnashai AS, Manfredi G (2011) Assessment of RC columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions recorded during the 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake. Eng Struct 33(5):1514–1535
EN-1998 (2005) Eurocode 8:design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. C.E.N, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium
EN-1993 (2005) Eurocode 3:design of steel structures—Part1: general rules and rules for buildings. C.E.N, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium
Filiatrault A, Tremblay R, Wanitkorkul A (2002) Performance evaluation of passive damping systems for the seismic retrofit of steel moment-resisting frames subjected to near-field ground motions. Earthq Spectra 17(3):427–437
Foti D (2014a) On the seismic response of protected and unprotected middle-rise steel frames in far-field and near-field areas. Shock Vib. Article ID 393870, ISSN: 10709622. doi:10.1155/2014/393870
Foti D (2014b) Response of frames seismically protected with passive systems in near-field areas. Int J Struct Eng 5(4):326–345. http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijstructe
Foti D (2015) Local ground effects in near-field and far-field areas on seismically protected buildings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 74:14–24. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.005
Foti D, Diaferio M, Nobile R (2010) Optimal design of a new seismic passive protection device made in aluminium and steel. Struct Eng Mech 35(1):119–122
Foti D, Diaferio M, Nobile R (2013) Dynamic behavior of new aluminum-steel energy dissipating devices. Struct Control Health Monit 20(7):1106–1119
Hall JF (1998) Seismic response of steel frame buildings to near-source ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27:1445–1464
Mazza F, Mazza M (2012) Nonlinear modeling and analysis of r.c. framed buildings located in near-fault areas. Open Constr Build Technol J 6:346–354
Mazza F, Vulcano A (2010) Nonlinear dynamic response of r.c. framed structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 8(6):1331–1350
Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (NTC) (2008) ‘Italian Ministry of Infrastructures’, Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni e relative istruzioni, D.M.14-01-2008 e Circolare 02-02-2009, n. 617/C.S.LL.PP
Ponzo FC, Di Cesare A, Nigro D, Vulcano A, Mazza F, Dolce M, Moroni C (2012) Jet-pacs project: dynamic experimental tests and numerical results obtained for a steel frame equipped with hysteretic damped chevron braces. J Earthq Eng 16(5):662–685
SPRINT RA351 bis Contract (1995) Final report. Semi-rigid joints in steel constructions. A simple calculus procedure and the design tables, University of Trento, Trento, Italy (in Italian)
Tirca L, Gioncu V (1998) The effects of horizontal and vertical ground motion near and far field regions. In: Proceedings of the “2nd Int. Ph.D. Symposium in Civil Engineering”, Budapest, pp 461–468
Tirca L, Foti D, Diaferio M (2003) Response of middle-rise steel frames with and without passive dampers to near-field ground motions. Eng Struct 25(2):169–179