Measuring the business case: linking stakeholder and shareholder value

LanceMoir1, MikeKennerley1, DavidFerguson1
1Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to provide a detailed review of how to design and test a framework for assessing the impact of corporate responsibility on firm value.Design/methodology/approachBuilding on an earlier conceptual framework, this paper describes the testing of the framework on three cases within EDF over a period of some six months. The results of the workshops on the cases are then taken to show how to build on the earlier conceptual framework.FindingsMuch of the difficulty of trading off corporate responsibility with financial performance is due to a lack of detailed understanding of how corporate responsibility issues can affect drivers of value. The framework was validated but to be effective it requires detailed understanding of both corporate responsibility and financial management.Research limitations/implicationsThe cases were undertaken within one company and so the results need to be tested in other contexts. Equally the model is too complex at this stage to be rolled out across the group.Practical implicationsNevertheless the framework is designed to be used in business and indeed EDF have taken the results into their processes.Originality/valueThe paper sets out a detailed approach to linking corporate responsibility and business value in a practical way. The issue now is for businesses to find ways to apply the framework.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arthur D. Little, Inc. (2002), “The business case for corporate citizenship”, available at: www.adlittle.com/insights/studies/pdf/corporate_citizenship.pdf.

Eden, C. and Huxham, C. (2003), “Action research”, in Partington, D. (Ed.), Essential Skills for Management Research, Sage Publications, London, pp. 254‐72.

Jensen, M.C. (2001), “Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 8‐21.

KPMG (2005), “International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005”, available at: www.kpmg.nl/Docs/Corporate_Site/Publicaties/International_Survey_Corporate_Responsibility_2005.pdf.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853‐86.

Moir, L. and Kennerley, M. (2006), “Reconciling governance philosophies: what to measure in the 21st Century?”, in Kakabadse, A. and Morsing, M. (Eds), Corporate Social Responsibility: Reconciling Aspiration with Application, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 81‐93.

Neely, A., Adams, C. and Kennerley, M. (2002), The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Stakeholder Relationships, FT Prentice‐Hall, London.

Rappaport, A. (1986), Creating Shareholder Value, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Willard, B. (2002), The Sustainability Advantage, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island.