Measuring the business and societal benefits of corporate responsibility

Corporate Governance (Bingley) - 2010
ManuelaDrews1
1Managing Director, pro.mara consulting, Hamburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe economic crisis has more than ever revealed the necessity for companies to extend their focus from the maximization of shareholder returns to the management of their complex stakeholder relationships including societal stakeholders. Although companies and scholars alike have been searching for adequate performance measurement systems that allow them to evaluate their relations with society, practical approaches to measure the benefits of CSR are still missing. This paper aims at filling this research gap. It proposes a measurement and a governance model to evaluate and manage the business as well as the societal benefits of CSR.Design/methodology/approachThe research follows a two‐step approach. First, a measurement model is developed based on a sound theoretical analysis. It is then applied in an in‐depth case study to test its applicability to business practice.FindingsThe research finds that current measurement approaches fail to provide a practicable measurement framework, especially relating to an evaluation of individual CSR activities. Thus, a framework is developed that applies methods of investment appraisal as well as qualitative evaluation approaches to individual CSR activities. The case study offers an easy‐to‐use evaluation tool that can be directly applied by business practice.Originality/valueCurrent research mostly focuses on quantitatively or qualitatively evaluating CSR. However, a comprehensive measurement of CSR needs to combine both. This is the focus of this paper. In addition, most measurement models focus on the business case for CSR. In this research, this perspective is complemented by proposing an evaluation from both perspectives – business and society.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Argenti, P.A. (2004), “Collaborating with activists: how Starbucks works with NGOs”, California Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 91‐116.

Austin, J.E. (2000), The Collaboration Challenge: How Nonprofits and Businesses Succeed through Strategic Alliances, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Berns, M., Townend, A., Khayat, Z., Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M.S. and Kruschwitz, N. (2009), “The business of sustainability: what it means to managers now”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 20‐6.

Borrmann, A., Fasbender, K., Holthus, M., von Gleich, A., Reichl, B. and Shams, R. (1999), Erfolgskontrolle in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Analyse, Bewertung, Reformen, Nomos, Baden‐Baden.

Bortz, J. and Döring, N. (2006), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human‐ und Sozialwissenschaftler, Springer, Heidelberg.

Dyllick, T. and Hockerts, K. (2002), “Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 130‐41.

Epstein, M.J. and Roy, M.‐J. (2001), “Sustainability in action: identifying and measuring the key performance drivers”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 585‐604.

Epstein, M.J. and Wisner, P.S. (2006), “Actions and measures to improve sustainability”, in Epstein, M.J. and Hanson, K.O. (Eds), The Accountable Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 3, Praeger Perspectives, Westport, CT and London, pp. 207‐34.

Figge, F. and Hahn, T. (2006), “Sustainable value added: a new approach to measuring corporate sustainable performance”, in Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (Eds), Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance, Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp. 146‐64.

Galaskiewicz, J. (1997), “An urban grants economy revisited: corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979‐81, 1987‐89”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, September, pp. 445‐71.

Gerpott, T.J. and Thomas, S.E. (2004), “Markenbewertungsverfahren: Einsatzfelder und Verfahrensüberblick”, WiSt, Vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 394‐400.

Goddard, T. (2006), “Do social objectives integrate with core corporate objectives? The future of social auditing”, in Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (Eds), Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance, Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp. 64‐81.

GRI (Ed.) (2006), RG: Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam.

Habisch, A. (2006), “Gesellschaftliches Engagement als Win‐Win‐Szenario”, in Gazdar, K., Habisch, A., Kirchhoff, K.R. and Vaseghi, S. (Eds), Erfolgsfaktor Verantwortung: Corporate Social Responsibility professionell managen, Springer, Berlin, pp. 81‐97.

Hahn, T. (2005), “Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen”, Universität Lüneburg, dissertation, Deutscher Universitäts‐Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Hopkins, M. (2005), “Measurement of corporate social responsibility”, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 6 Nos 3/4, pp. 213‐31.

Husted, B.W. and de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006), “Taking Friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 75‐91.

Koch, T. (2007), “Geld ist doch anstreichbar: DEG‐Ratinginstrument leistet Beitrag für systematische Beurteilung von Privatsektorvorhaben in Entwicklungsländern”, Entwicklungspolitik Information Nord‐Süd, No. 2/3, February, pp. 45‐8.

Kurucz, E.C., Colbert, B.A. and Wheeler, D. (2008), “The business case for corporate social responsibility”, in Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D.S. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 83‐112.

Lamnek, S. (1995), Qualitative Sozialforschung: Band 2, Methoden und Techniken, Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim.

LBG (Ed.) (2004), Measure for Measure: Celebrating the LBG's First Ten Years, The London Benchmarking Group and The Corporate Citizenship Company, London.

Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P. (2003), “Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 268‐305.

Naderer, G. (2005), “Markenbewertung: Zum aktuellen Stand der Forschung”, in Gaiser, B., Linxweiler, R. and Brucker, V. (Eds), Praxisorientierte Markenführung: Neue Strategien, innovative Instrumente und aktuelle Fallstudien, Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 157‐74.

Salzmann, O., Ionescu‐Somers, A. and Steger, U. (2005), “The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options”, European Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 27‐36.

Sander, L. and Langer, C. (2004), “New public management: Der Übergang zur outputorientierten Verwaltung”, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 88‐94.

Schaltegger, S. and Synnestvedt, T. (2002), “The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 65 No. 4, pp. 339‐46.

Steger, U. (2006), “Building a business case for corporate sustainability”, in Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (Eds), Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance, Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp. 412‐43.

Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S. and Wehrmeyer, W. (2001), “The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms”, Greener Management International, No. 34, Summer, pp. 95‐108.

Weber, M. (2008a), The Business Case for Corporate Societal Engagement: Development and Evaluation of Value‐Creating Societal Strategies, Oekom, München.

Weber, M. (2008b), “The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company‐level measurement approach for CSR”, European Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 247‐61.

World Bank (2006), Project Performance Assessment Report: Vietnam Population and Family Health Project (Credit No. 2807), Report No. 36555, July, Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank, Washington, DC.

World Bank (Ed.) (2007a), Project Performance Assessment Report: Bangladesh Dhaka Urban Transport Project (Credit 3163‐BD), Report No. 39323, April 4, Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank, Washington, DC.

World Bank (Ed.) (2007b), Implementation Completion and Results Report (MULT‐28200) on a Grant from the Multilateral Fund in the Amount of US$13 Million to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for an Ozone‐Depleting Substances Phase‐Out Project, Report No. ICR0000548, September 21, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Corporate Governance (Bingley)

Thông tin tác giả