Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Jensen, 1986, The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods, Pain, 27, 117, 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9
Revill, 1976, The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain, Anaesthesia, 31, 1191, 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x
Price, 1994, A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales, Pain, 56, 217, 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3
DeLoach, 1998, The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale, Anesth Analg, 86, 102
Campbell, 1998, Quantifying meaningful changes in pain, Anaesthesia, 53, 121, 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00294.x
Myles, 2005, The linearity of the visual analogue scale in patients with severe acute pain, Anaesth Intensive Care, 33, 54, 10.1177/0310057X0503300108
Bodian, 2001, The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients, Anesthesiology, 95, 1356, 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013
Myles, 2011, Measuring pain and analgesic response, Eur J Anaesthesiol, 28, 399, 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834592a8
Weibel, 2016, Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis, Br J Anaesth, 116, 770, 10.1093/bja/aew101
Aubrun, 2003, Relationships between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration, Anesthesiology, 98, 1415, 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00017
Cepeda, 2003, What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?, Pain, 105, 151, 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00176-3
Farrar, 2000, Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures, Pain, 88, 287, 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0
Dworkin, 2009, Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations, Pain, 146, 238, 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019
Tubach, 2005, Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues, J Rheumatol, 32, 2025
Wells, 2001, Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods, J Rheumatol, 28, 406
Guyatt, 2002, Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures, Mayo Clin Proc, 77, 371, 10.4065/77.4.371
Moore, 1997, Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales, Pain, 69, 311, 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03306-4
Todd, 1996, The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores, Acad Emerg Med, 3, 142, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03402.x
Auffinger, 2014, Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement, Neurosurgery, 74, 206, 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000247
Farrar, 2001, Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale, Pain, 94, 149, 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
Childs, 2005, Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 1331, 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29
Emshoff, 2011, Clinically important difference thresholds of the visual analog scale: a conceptual model for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity, Pain, 152, 2277, 10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.003
Kelly, 2001, The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain, Emerg Med J, 18, 205, 10.1136/emj.18.3.205
Gallagher, 2001, Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale, Ann Emerg Med, 38, 633, 10.1067/mem.2001.118863
Tashjian, 2009, Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 18, 927, 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021
Wariaghli, 2013, The patient acceptable symptom state of chronic musculoskeletal pain measured on a visual analog scale in Moroccan patients, Pain Med, 14, 103, 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01529.x
Myles, 2016, Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales, Anesthesiology, 125, 39, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158
Norman, 2003, Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation, Med Care, 41, 582, 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
Samsa, 1999, Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II, Pharmacoeconomics, 15, 141, 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003
Eton, 2004, A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale, J Clin Epidemiol, 57, 898, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012
Wyrwich, 1999, Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 861, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00071-2
Ringash, 2007, Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes, Cancer, 110, 196, 10.1002/cncr.22799
Maringwa, 2011, Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients, Ann Oncol, 22, 2107, 10.1093/annonc/mdq726
Juniper, 1994, Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire, J Clin Epidemiol, 47, 81, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1
Wells, 2003, MCID/Low Disease Activity State Workshop: summary, recommendations, and research agenda, J Rheumatol, 30, 1115
Sedgwick, 2015, How to read a receiver operating characteristic curve, Br Med J, 350, h2464, 10.1136/bmj.h2464
Kirshner, 1985, A methodological framework for assessing health indices, J Chronic Dis, 38, 27, 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0
Kazis, 1989, Effect sizes for intepreting changes in health status, Med Care, 27, S178, 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015
Jensen, 2003, Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain, J Pain, 4, 407, 10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8
Hartrick, 2003, The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?, Pain Pract, 3, 310, 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x
Bainbridge, 2006, Patient-controlled versus nurse-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery – a meta-analysis, Can J Anaesth, 53, 492, 10.1007/BF03022623
Park, 2016, Can a minimal clinically important difference be achieved in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity who undergo minimally invasive spinal surgery?, World Neurosurg, 86, 168, 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.072
Myles, 2004, The pain visual analog scale: linear or nonlinear?, Anesthesiology, 100, 744, 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00042
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use: Guideline on the Choice of the Non-Inferiority Margin. London. 2005. Available from http://wwwemaeuropaeu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003636pdf (accessed 1 July 2016).
Gibbs, 2012, Beyond effect size: consideration of the minimum effect size of interest in anesthesia trials, Anesth Analg, 114, 471, 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823d2ab7