Measurement of the Whole and Midsubstance Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: The Comparison with the Elliptically Calculated Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint Area

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 53 - Trang 727-731 - 2019
Genki Iwama1, Takanori Iriuchishima2,3, Takashi Horaguchi1, Shin Aizawa2
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, Japan
2Department of Functional Morphology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kamimoku Hot Springs Hospital, Minakami, Japan

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study was to measure the detailed morphology of the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint. The correlation and the comparison between the measured area and the area which mathematically calculated as elliptical were also evaluated. Thirty nine nonpaired human cadaver knees were used. The ACL was cut in the middle, and the femoral bone was cut at the most proximal point of the femoral notch. The ACL was carefully dissected, and the periphery of the ACL insertion site was outlined on both the whole footprint and the midsubstance insertion. Lateral view of the femoral condyle was photographed with a digital camera, and the images were downloaded to a personal computer. The area, length, and width of the femoral ACL footprint were measured with Image J software (National Institution of Health). Using the length and width of the femoral ACL footprint, the elliptical area was calculated as 0.25 π (length × width). Statistical analysis was performed to reveal the correlation and the comparison of the measured and elliptically calculated area. The sizes of the whole and midsubstance femoral ACL footprints were 127.6 ± 41.7 mm2 and 61 ± 20.2 mm2, respectively. The sizes of the elliptically calculated whole and midsubstance femoral ACL footprints were 113.9 ± 4.5 mm2 and 58.4 ± 3 mm2, respectively. Significant difference was observed between the measured and the elliptically calculated area. In the midsubstance insertion, significant correlation was observed between the measured and the elliptically calculated area (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.603, P = 0.001). However, no correlation was observed in the whole ACL insertion area. The morphology of the femoral ACL insertion resembles an elliptical shape. However, due to the wide variation in morphology, the femoral ACL insertion cannot be considered mathematically elliptical.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fu FH. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2011;34:281–3. Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Yorifuji H, Aizawa S, Murakami T, Fu FH, et al. ACL footprint size is correlated with the height and area of the lateral wall of femoral intercondylar notch. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:789–96. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH, et al. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:213–9. Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:108–13. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2007;23:618–28. Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA. Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:176–89. Tompkins M, Ma R, Hogan MV, Miller MD. What’s new in sports medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:789–97. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:660–6. Dargel J, Pohl P, Tzikaras P, Koebke J. Morphometric side-to-side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:398–402. Davis TJ, Shelbourne KD, Klootwyk TE. Correlation of the intercondylar notch width of the femur to the width of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999;7:209–14. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: An anatomic study. Arthroscopy 2007;23:1218–25. Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Shirakura K, Morimoto Y, Kubomura T, Horaguchi T, et al. In vitro and in vivo AM and PL tunnel positioning in anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:1085–90. Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y, et al. Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: A cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1226–31. Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH. The difference in centre position in the ACL femoral footprint inclusive and exclusive of the fan-like extension fibres. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:254–9. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement – A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 2008;24:585–92. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 2008;24:154–61. Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH, et al. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: Clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:2016–26. Hensler D, Working ZM, Illingworth KD, Thorhauer ED, Tashman S, Fu FH, et al. Medial portal drilling: Effects on the femoral tunnel aperture morphology during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:2063–71. Kim JG, Chang MH, Lim HC, Bae JH, Lee SY, Ahn JH, et al. An in vivo 3D computed tomographic analysis of femoral tunnel geometry and aperture morphology between rigid and flexible systems in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique. Arthroscopy 2015;31:1318–29. Kopf S, Martin DE, Tashman S, Fu FH. Effect of tibial drill angles on bone tunnel aperture during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:871–81. Noh JH, Yang BG, Roh YH, Kim SW, Kim W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring autograft: Conventional single-bundle technique versus oval-footprint technique. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1502–10. Oshima T, Nakase J, Numata H, Takata Y, Tsuchiya H. The cross-sectional shape of the fourfold semitendinosus tendon is oval, not round. J Exp Orthop 2016;3:28. Petersen W, Forkel P, Achtnich A, Metzlaff S, Zantop T. Technique of anatomical footprint reconstruction of the ACL with oval tunnels and medial portal aimers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:827–33. Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Maeda S, Mizukami H, et al. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: Discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy 2012;28:1135–46. Tashiro Y, Lucidi GA, Gale T, Nagai K, Herbst E, Irrgang JJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion site is elliptical or triangular shaped in healthy young adults: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:485–90. Yilmaz B, Özdemir G, Keskinöz EN, Tümentemur G, Gökkuş K, Demiralp B, et al. Comparing dimensions of four-strand hamstring tendon grafts with native anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:3795367. Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Horibe S, Nakagawa S, et al. Rectangular tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to mimic natural fiber arrangement. Arthroscopy 2008;24:1178–83. Luites JW, Wymenga AB, Blankevoort L, Kooloos JG. Description of the attachment geometry of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL from arthroscopic perspective for anatomical tunnel placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:1422–31. Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW. Anterior cruciate ligament revision: Double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 2006;22:683.e1-5. Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A, Kato Y, Saeki K, Asai S, et al. Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: A biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1233–8. Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:787–92. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: Comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 2006;22:240–51. Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1789–99.