Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics

Entropy - Tập 22 Số 3 - Trang 269
Orly Shenker1, Meir Hemmo2
1Department of Philosophy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
2Department of Philosophy, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel

Tóm tắt

Maxwell’s Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of temporal directionality as well. Various attempts to “exorcise” the Demon, by proving that it is impossible for one reason or another, have been made throughout the years, but none of them were successful. We have shown (in a number of publications) by a general state-space argument that Maxwell’s Demon is compatible with classical mechanics, and that the most recent solutions, based on Landauer’s thesis, are not general. In this paper we demonstrate that Maxwell’s Demon is also compatible with quantum mechanics. We do so by analyzing a particular (but highly idealized) experimental setup and proving that it violates the Second Law. Our discussion is in the framework of standard quantum mechanics; we give two separate arguments in the framework of quantum mechanics with and without the projection postulate. We address in our analysis the connection between measurement and erasure interactions and we show how these notions are applicable in the microscopic quantum mechanical structure. We discuss what might be the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical notion of “macrostates”, thus explaining why our Quantum Demon setup works not only at the micro level but also at the macro level, properly understood. One implication of our analysis is that the Second Law cannot provide a universal lawlike basis for an account of the arrow of time; this account has to be sought elsewhere.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Linden, 2009, Quantum Mechanical Evolution towards Thermal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E, 79, 061103, 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.061103

Goldstein, 2010, Normal Typicality and Von Neumann’s Quantum Ergodic Theorem, Proc. R. Soc. A, 466, 3203, 10.1098/rspa.2009.0635

Garrido, P.L., de los Santos, F., and Marro, J. (2011). On the Approach to Thermal Equilibrium of Macroscopic Quantum Systems. Non-Equilibrium Statistical Physics Today: Proceedings of the 11th Granada Seminar on Computational and Statistical Physics, AIP Conference Proceeding 1332, American Institute of Physics.

Goldstein, S., Huse, D.A., Lebowitz, J.L., and Tumulka, R. (2015). Thermal Equilibrium of a Macroscopic Quantum System in a Pure State, unpublished manuscript. arXiv.

Goldstein, S., Huse, D.A., Lebowitz, J.L., and Tumulka, R. (2016). Macroscopic and microscopic thermal equilibrium, unpublished manuscript. arXiv.

Shenker, O. (2020). Quantum Foundations of Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics. Companion to the Philosophy of Physics, Routledge.

Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O. (2012). The Road to Maxwell’s Demon: Conceptual Foundations of Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.

Hemmo, 2015, Probability and Typicality in Deterministic Physics, Erkenntnis, 80, 575, 10.1007/s10670-014-9683-0

Goldstein, 1992, Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty, J. Stat. Phys., 67, 843, 10.1007/BF01049004

Albert, D. (2000). Time and Chance, Harvard University Press.

Maudlin, 2007, What could be Objective about Probabilities?, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 38, 275, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.04.006

Frigg, 2009, Typicality and the Approach to Equilibrium in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics, Philos. Sci., 76, 997, 10.1086/605800

Ben Menahem, Y., and Hemmo, M. (2012). Typicality and Notions of Probability in Physics. Probability in Physics, Springer.

Ben Menahem, Y., and Hemmo, M. (2012). Typicality and the Role of the Lebesgue Leasure in Statistical Mechanics. Probability in Physics, Springer.

Lazarovici, 2015, Typicality, Irreversibility and the Status of Macroscopic Laws, Erkenntnis, 80, 689, 10.1007/s10670-014-9668-z

Baldovin, 2019, Irreversibility and Typicality: A Simple Analytical Result for the Ehrenfest Model, Physica A, 524, 422, 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.188

Brown, 2001, The Origins of Time-Asymmetry in Thermodynamics: The Minus First Law, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 32, 525, 10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00021-1

Hemmo, 2010, Maxwell’s Demon, J. Philos., 107, 389, 10.5840/jphil2010107833

Hemmo, 2011, Szilard’s Perpetuum Mobile, Philos. Sci., 78, 264, 10.1086/659231

Hemmo, 2013, Entropy and Computation: The Landauer-Bennett Thesis Reexamined, Entropy, 15, 3387, 10.3390/e15083297

Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O. (2016, February 27). Maxwell’s Demon, Oxford Online Handbook (Oxford University Press). Available online: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935314-e-63?rskey=plUl7T&result=1.

Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O. (2019). The Physics of Implementing Logic: Landauer’s Principle and the Multiple-Computations Theorem. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.

Leff, H., and Rex, A. (2003). Maxwell’s Demon 2: Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information Computing, Institute of Physics Publishing.

Landauer, 1961, Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process, IBM. J. Res. Dev., 3, 183, 10.1147/rd.53.0183

Landauer, R. (1994, January 17–20). Information is Physical. Proceedings of the PhysComp, Workshop on Physics and Computation, Dallas, TX, USA.

Bennett, 1973, Logical Reversibility of Computation, IBM. J. Res. Dev., 17, 525, 10.1147/rd.176.0525

Bennett, 1982, The Thermodynamics of Computation: A Review, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 21, 905, 10.1007/BF02084158

Bennett, 2003, Notes on Landauer’s Principle, Reversible Computation, and Maxwell’s Demon, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 34, 501, 10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00039-X

Earman, 1999, Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell’s Demon. Part II. From Szilard to Landauer and Beyond, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 30, 1, 10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00026-4

Leff, H., and Rex, A. (2003). Maxwell’s Demon, Szilard’s Engine and Quantum Measurement. Maxwell’s Demon 2: Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information Computing, Institute of Physics Publishing.

Lebowitz, 1993, Boltzmann’s Entropy and Time’s Arrow, Phys. Today, 46, 32, 10.1063/1.881363

Sklar, L. (1993). Physics and Chance, Cambridge University Press.

Butterfield, J., and Earman, J. (2007). Compendium to the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics. Handbook for the Philosophy of Physics, Part B, Elsevier.

Rickles, D. (2008). A Field Guide to Recent Work on the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, Ashgate.

Rondoni, 2012, On Γ and μ-space Descriptions: Gibbs and Boltzmann Entropies of Symplectic Coupled Maps, Phys. Scr., 86, 058513, 10.1088/0031-8949/86/05/058513

Werndl, 2017, Mind the gap: Boltzmannian versus Gibbsian equilibrium, Philos. Sci., 84, 1289, 10.1086/694088

Callender, 1999, Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: The Case of Entropy, J. Philos., 96, 348

Ridderbos, 1998, The Spin Echo Experiments and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Found. Phys., 28, 1237, 10.1023/A:1018870725369

Maroney, 2005, The (Absence of a) Relationship between Thermodynamic and Logical Reversibility, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 36, 355, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.11.006

Hey, J.G., and Allen, W. (1996). Feynman Lectures on Computation, Addison-Wesley.

Bub, 2001, Maxwell’s Demon and the Thermodynamics of Computation, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 32, 569, 10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00023-5

Ladyman, 2007, The Connection between Logical and Thermodynamic Irreversibility, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 38, 58, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.03.007

Ladyman, 2014, Going Round in Circles: Landauer vs. Norton on the Thermodynamics of Computation, Entropy, 16, 2278, 10.3390/e16042278

Earman, 1998, Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell’s Demon. Part I. From Maxwell to Szilard, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 29, 435, 10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00023-9

Norton, 2005, Eaters of the Lotus: Landauer’s Principle and the Return of Maxwell’s Demon, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys., 36, 375, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.12.002

Norton, 2011, Waiting for Landauer, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 42, 184, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.05.002

Ma, S.K. (1985). Statistical Mechanics, World Scientific.

Shenker, 2020, Information vs. Entropy vs. Probability, Eur. J. Philos. Sci., 10, 1

Chida, 2017, Power Generator Driven by Maxwell’s Demon, Nat. Commun., 8, 15310, 10.1038/ncomms15301

Cottet, N., Jezouin, S., Bretheau, L., Campagne-Ibarcq, P., Ficheux, Q., Anders, J., Auffèves, A., Azouit, R., Rouchon, P., and Huard, B. (2017). Observing a Quantum Maxwell Demon At Work. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

Masuyama, 2018, Information-to-work Conversion by Maxwell’s Demon in a Superconducting Circuit Quantum Electrodynamical System, Nat. Commun., 9, 1, 10.1038/s41467-018-03686-y

Wheeler, J.A., and Zurek, W.H. (1983). On the Decrease of Entropy in a Thermodynamic System by the Intervention of Intelligent Beings. Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press.

Stuartm, M.J., Brown, J.R., and Fehige, Y. (2018). The Worst Thought Experiment. The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments, Routledge.

Cerino, 2016, The Role of the Number of Degrees of Freedom and Chaos in Macroscopic Irreversibility, Physica A, 442, 486, 10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.036

Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Giulini, D.D., Keifer, C., Kupsch, J., and Stamatescu, I.O. (2003). Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Springer.

von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press.

Hemmo, 2006, Von Neumann Entropy Does Not Correspond to Thermodynamic Entropy, Philos. Sci., 73, 153, 10.1086/510816

Uffink, 2001, Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 32, 305, 10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00016-8

Scully, 2003, Extracting Work from a Single Heat Bath via Vanishing Quantum Coherence, Science, 299, 862, 10.1126/science.1078955

Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O. (2019). The Past Hypothesis and the Psychological Arrow of Time. Br. J. Philos. Sci.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Entropy

Tập 22 Số 3

269

Thông tin tác giả