Mating behaviour of the large-head resin bee Heriades truncorum (Megachilidae: Osminii) suggests female plastic strategy in selection of a mating partner and male quality assessment

Apidologie - 2022
Samuel Boff1,2
1Animal Ecology and Tropical Ecology, University of Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
2Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

Tóm tắt

Behavioural courtship display and size of males are two attributes often used by females to select a mating partner. According to sexual selection, such traits are of importance, because a bigger size male or males displaying a better courtship could enhance the possibility of females to transmit her genes to the following generations via her offspring. In Hymenoptera such as in solitary bees, it is known that females can assess male quality and add this information in the process of mating choice. In the current study, I describe aspects of pre-copulatory mating behaviour of males, male quality assessment and female choice in the large-headed resin bee Heriades truncorum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae: Osminii). Males of Heriades truncorum perform thoracic vibration, fan their wings and lift upwards female’s abdomen to copulate. Couples engage in sideways rocking motion movement like a dance. Female selection of a partner was also found to be density dependent. In a pair situation (one female for one male), female copulate equally with males of all sizes and male mating effort enhanced the chance of successful copulation. In an environment with mating choices (one female for two males of different sizes), successful copulation was significantly more frequent for bigger size males. Female response to male mounting took place independently of the number of mating partners in the arena and did not impair mating. Additionally, size had no effect on male-male competition. Both results suggest mating success in Heriades truncorum rely on a female choice mechanism.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alcock J (2009) Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 9th ed. Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 9th ed.: xvi, 606–xvi, 606.

Alcock J (2013) 45 Advances in the Study of Behavior Sexual selection and the mating behavior of solitary bees. Elsevier Inc., 1–48 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407186-5.00001-X

Alcock J, Johnson MD (1990) Female mate choice in the carpenter bee Xylocopa varipuncta (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Journal of Zoology 221: 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb03991.x

Alcock J, Eickwort GC, Eickwort KR (1977) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium maculosum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the evolutionary significance of multiple copulations by females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2: 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299507

Atwell A, Wagner WE (2014) Female mate choice plasticity is affected by the interaction between male density and female age in a field cricket. Animal Behaviour 98: 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.007

Ayasse M, Paxton RJ, Tengö J (2001) Mating behavior and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 31–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.31

Benelli G, Bonsignori G, Stefanini C, Dario P, Canale A (2013) Male Wing Fanning Performance During Successful and Unsuccessful Mating in the Parasitic Wasp Lariophagus distinguendus Förster (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 26: 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9356-2

Chiappa E, Mandujano V (2020) Etograma y análisis de los sonidos realizados por los machos durante la cópula en Colletes musculus (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). Revista Chilena De Entomología 46: 553–562. https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.46.4.20.01

Conrad T, Ayasse M (2015) The role of vibrations in population divergence in the red mason bee, Osmia bicornis. Current Biology 25: 2819–2822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.059

Conrad T, Paxton RJ, Barth FG, Francke W, Ayasse M (2010) Female choice in the red mason bee, Osmia rufa (L.) (Megachilidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 4065–4073. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.038174

Dec E, Vivallo F (2021) Reproductive behavior of the oil-collecting bee Epicharis dejeanii (Apidae: Centridini). Apidologie 52: 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-020-00825-7

Dutra AL, Schlindwein C, Oliveira R (2021) Females of a solitary bee reject males to collect food for offspring. Behavioral Ecology 31: 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/BEHECO/ARAA026

Eickwort GC (1977) Male territorial behaviour in the mason bee Hoplitis anthocopoides (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Animal Behaviour 25: 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90105-1

Frohlich DR, Parker FD (1985) Observations on the Nest-building and Reproductive Behavior of a Resin-gathering Bee: Dianthidium ulkei (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78: 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/78.6.804

Hofmann M, Fleischmann A, Renner S (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105–117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182.suppl2

Hoikkala A, Aspi J, Suvanto L (1999) Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male mating success in Drosophila montana. Journal of Insect Behavior 12: 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020971518710

Jaycox ER (1967) Territorial Behavior among Males of Anthidium banningense ( Hymenoptera : Megachilidae ). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society , 40: 565–570.

Koffler S, Meneses HM, Kleinert ADMP, Jaffé R (2016) Competitive males have higher quality sperm in a monogamous social bee. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0765-2

Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361: 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1784

Konzmann S, Kluth M, Karadana D, Lunau K (2020) Pollinator effectiveness of a specialist bee exploiting a generalist plant—tracking pollen transfer by Heriades truncorum with quantum dots. Apidologie 51: 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00700-0

Lee KY, Yoon HJ, Lee KS, Jin BR (2016) Development and mating behavior of Osmia cornifrons (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in the constant temperature. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 19: 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2016.03.003

Lehmann GUC (2007) Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 55: 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06105

López-Uribe MM, Jha S, Soro A (2019) A trait-based approach to predict population genetic structure in bees. Molecular Ecology 28: 1919–1929. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15028

Maciel de Almeida Correa ML (1981) Contribution a l’étude de la biologie d’Heriades truncorum L. (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Apidologie 11: 309–339.

Mhatre N, Montealegre-Z F, Balakrishnan R, Robert D (2012) Changing resonator geometry to boost sound power decouples size and song frequency in a small insect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200192109

Michez D, Rasmont P, Terzo M, Vereecken NJ (2019) Bees of Europe. In: N.A.P. (Ed.), Paris.

Neff L, Simpson B (1991) Nest Biology and Mating Behavior of Megachile fortis in Central Texas (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Journal of the Kansas entomological Society 64: 324–336.

Parker GA (2015) Reprinted from Bateson ( ed .) Mate Choice Printed in Great Britain.

Paxton RJ (2005) Male mating behaviour and mating systems of bees: an overview. Apidologie 36: 145–156.

Praz CJ, Müller A, Danforth BN, Griswold TL, Widmer A, Dorn S (2008) Phylogeny and biogeography of bees of the tribe Osmiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.07.005

R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.

Ribeiro PD, Daleo P, Iribarne OO (2010) Density affects mating mode and large male mating advantage in a fiddler crab. Oecologia 164: 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1801-3

Rozen JG, Praz CJ (2016) Mature Larvae and Nesting Biologies of Bees Currently Assigned to the Osmiini (Apoidea: Megachilidae). American Museum Novitates 2016-Septe. https://doi.org/10.1206/3864.1

Russell AL, Buchmann SL, De Sabino WO, Papaj DR (2018) Brawls bring buzz: Male Size Influences Competition and Courtship in Diadasia rinconis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Science 18: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey083

Sabino WO, da Silva CI, Alves-dos-Santos I (2017) Mating System and Sleeping Behaviour of the Male and Female Centris (Paracentris) burgdorfi Friese (Apidae, Centridini). Journal of Insect Behavior 30: 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-017-9600-x

Savalli UM, Fox CW (1998) Sexual selection and fitness consequences of male body size in the seed beetle Stator limatus. Animal Behaviour 55: 473–483.

Von Schantz T, Göransson G, Andersson G, Fröberg I, Grahn M, Helgée A, Wittzell H (1989) Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature 337: 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/337166a0

Schindler M, Hofmann MM, Wittmann D, Renner SS (2018) Courtship behaviour in the genus Nomada - Antennal grabbing and possible transfer of male secretions. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 65: 47–59. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.65.24947

Seidelmann K, Rolke D (2019) Advertisement of unreceptivity – Perfume modifications of mason bee females (Osmia bicornis and O. cornuta) and a non-existing antiaphrodisiac. PLOS ONE 14: e0215925.

Severinghaus LL, Kurtak BH, Eickwort GC (1981) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the significance of size for territorial males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299853

Shamble PS, Wilgers DJ, Swoboda KA, Hebets EA (2009) Courtship effort is a better predictor of mating success than ornamentation for male wolf spiders. Behavioral Ecology 20: 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp116

Sihag RC (1986) Reproduction in alfalfa pollinating sub-tropical megachilid bees. 1. Functional anatomy and histology of the organs of reproduction. Zoologischer Anzeiger v. 216.

Simmons LW, Tomkins JL, Alcock J (2000) Can minor males of Dawson’s burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni (Hymenoptera: Anthophorini) compensate for reduced access to virgin females through sperm competition? Behavioral Ecology 11: 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.3.319

Sugiura N (1991) Male territoriality and mating tactics in the wool-carder bee, Anthidium septemspinosum Lepeletier (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Journal of Ethology 9: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350213

Takeshita F, Murai M (2016) The vibrational signals that male fiddler crabs (Uca lactea) use to attract females into their burrows. Science of Nature 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1371-2

Thomas ML (2011) Detection of female mating status using chemical signals and cues. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 86: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00130.x

Turell JM (1976) Observations on the mating behavior of Anthidiellum notatum and Anthidiellum perplexum. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 59: 55–61.

Vereecken NJ, Mant J, Schiestl FP (2007) Population differentiation in female sex pheromone and male preferences in a solitary bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0312-z

Villalobos EM, Shelly TE (1991) Correlates of male mating success in two species of Anthidium bees (Hymenoptera : Megachilidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164294

Wittmann D, Blochtein B (1995) Why males of leafcutter bees hold the females’ antennae with their front legs during mating. Apidologie 26: 181–195.