Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress

Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375–393 Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296–302 Andersson S, Pryke SR, Ornborg J, Lawes MJ, Andersson M (2002) Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. Am Nat 160:683–691 Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am Nat 165:S27–S36 Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton Bentsen CL, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat 167:E102–E116 Blows MW (2007) A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J Evol Biol 20:1–8 Blows MW, Hoffmann AA (2005) A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371–1384 Bonduriansky R (2007) The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169:9–19 Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2003) Interactions among mechanisms of sexual selection on male body size and head shape in a sexually dimorphic fly. Evolution 57:2046–2053 Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005) Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution 59:138–151 Brandt LSE, Greenfield MD (2004) Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. J Evol Biol 17:821–828 Brcic-Kostic K (2005) Neutral mutation as the source of genetic variation in life history traits. Genet Res 86:53–63 Brooks R (2000) Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406:67–70 Brooks R, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussière LF, Jennions MD (2005) Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution 59:871–880 Bürger R, Gimelfarb A (2002) Fluctuating environments and the role of mutation in maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Genet Res 80:31–46 Byers DL (2005) Evolution in heterogeneous environments and the potential of maintenance of genetic variation in traits of adaptive significance. Genetica 123:107–124 Candolin U (2004) Opposing selection on a sexually dimorphic trait through female choice and male competition in a water boatman. Evolution 58:1861–1864 Charmantier A, Garant D (2005) Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1415–1425 Charmantier A, Perrins C, McCleery RH, Sheldon BC (2006) Quantitative genetics of age at reproduction in wild swans: support for antagonistic pleiotropy models of senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6587–6592 Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A (2006) Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr Biol 16:R755–R765 Danielson-Francois AM, Kelly JK, Greenfield MD (2006) Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J Evol Biol 19:532–542 David P, Bjorksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyes flies. Nature 406:186–188 Dykhuizen D, Hartl DL (1980) Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in Escherichia coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96:801–817 Ellner S, Hairston NG (1994) Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment. Am Nat 143:403–417 Emlen DJ (1996) Artificial selection on horn length body-size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:1219–1230 Etges WJ, de Oliveira CC, Gragg E, Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor MAF, Ritchie MG (2007) Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61:1106–1119 Felsenstein J (1976) The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Ann Rev Genet 10:253–280 Forslund P (2003) An experimental investigation into status dependent male dimorphism in the European earwig, Forficula auricularia. Anim Behav 65:309–316 Frank SA, Slatkin M (1990) Evolution in a variable environment. Am Nat 136:244–260 Frankino WA, Zwaan BJ, Stern DL, Brakefield PM (2005) Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307:718–720 Gebhardt-Henrich SG, van Noordwijk AJ (1991) Nestling growth in the Great Tit. I. Heritability estimates under different environmental conditions. J Evol Biol 3:341–362 Gibson G, Dworkin I (2004) Uncovering cryptic genetic variation Nature Reviews. Genetics 5:681–U11 Glazier DS (1999) Trade-offs between reproductive and somatic (storage) investments in animals: a comparative test of the van Noordwijk and de Jong model. Evol Ecol 13:539–555 Glazier DS (2002) Resource-allocation rules and the heritability of traits. Evolution 56:1696–1700 Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL (2004) Genotype-environment interactions and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68:1461–1468 Griffith SC (2007) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection. Am Nat 169:274–281 Haldane JBS, Jayakar SD (1963) Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. Heredity 58:237–242 Hall M, Lindholm AK, Brooks R (2004) Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response. BMC Evol Biol 4:1 Head ML, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2005) The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol 3:289–294 Hedrick PW (1986) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: a decade later. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:535–566 Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP (1976) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:1–32 Hegyi G, Rosivall B, Torok J (2006) Paternal age and offspring growth: separating the intrinsic quality of young from rearing effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:672–682 Henderson CR (1982) Analysis of covariance in the mixed model: higher-level, non-homogeneous, and random regressions. Biometrics 38:623–640 Hine E, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2004) Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58:2754–2762 Houle D (1989) The maintenance of polygenic variation in finite populations. Evolution 43:1767–1780 Hunt J, Blows MW, Zajitschek F, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2007) Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Genetics 177:875–880 Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussière LF (2004a) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024–1027 Hunt J, Bussière LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2004b) What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol Evol. 19:329–333 Hunt J, Jennions MD, Spyrou N, Brooks R (2006) Artificial selection on male longevity influences age-dependent reproductive effort in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat 168:E72–E86 Hunt J, Simmons LW (2001) Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2409–2414 Jia FY, Greenfield MD, Collins RD (2000) Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54:953–967 Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL (2007) Condition dependence, quantitative genetics, and the potential signal content of iridescent ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Evolution 61:168–183 Kirkpatrick M, Ryan M (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38 Kirzhner VM, Korol AB, Ronin YI, Nevo E (1994) Cyclical behavior of genotype frequencies in a 2–locus population under fluctuating haploid selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11432–11436 Kirzhner VM, Korol AB, Ronin YI, Nevo E (1995) Genetic supercycles caused by cyclical selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7130–7133 Klingenberg CP (2003) Quantitative genetics of geometric shape: heritability and the pitfalls of the univariate approach. Evolution 57:191–195 Kokko H (1998) Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evol Ecol 12:739–750 Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:653–664 Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1331–1340 Kokko H, Heubel K (2007) Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions, and the lek paradox. Genetica. doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9166-1 Kondrashov AS, Yampolsky LY (1996) High genetic variability under the balance between symmetric mutation and fluctuating stabilizing selection. Genet Res 68:157–164 Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (2001) Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684–686 Kruuk LEB (2004) Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model’. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 359:873–890 Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ (2006) A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects. Anim Behav 72:263–273 LeBas NR, Hockham LR, Ritchie MG (2004) Sexual selection in the gift-giving dance fly, Rhamphomyia sulcata, favors small males carrying small gifts. Evolution 58:1763–1772 Merila J (1996) Genetic variation in offspring condition: an experiment. Funct Ecol 10:465–474 Merila J, Przybylo R, Sheldon BC (1999) Genetic variation and natural selection on blue tit body condition in different environments. Genet Res 73:165–176 Miller LK, Brooks R (2005) The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness. Evolution 59:2414–2425 Mills SC, Alatalo RV, Koskela E, Mappes J, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2007) Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interactions and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution 61:1748–1757 Moore AJ, Moore PJ (1999) Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:711–716 Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE (2007) The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 20:831–844 O’Brien EL, Dawson RD (2007) Context-dependent genetic benefits of extra-pair mate choice in a socially monogamous passerine. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:775–782 Pischedda A, Chippindale AK (2006) Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biol 4:2099–2103 Postma E (2006) Implications of the difference between true and predicted breeding values for the study of natural selection and micro-evolution. J Evol Biol 19:309–320 Qvarnstrom A (1999) Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53:1564–1572 Radwan J (2007) Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms. Genetica. doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9203-0 Radwan J, Unrug J, Tomkins JL (2002) Status-dependence and morphological trade-offs in the expression of a sexually selected character in the mite, Sancassania berlesei. J Evol Biol 15:744–752 Robinson MR, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB (2006) Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep. Evolution 60:2168–2181 Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD (2003) Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57:1304–1313 Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433–447 Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1415–1421 Schaeffer LR (2004) Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci 86:35–45 Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Schurr F, Lubjuhn T (2005) Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 59:645–657 Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (2004) Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93:241–248 Sheldon BC, Arponen H, Laurila A, Crochet PA, Merila J (2003) Sire coloration influences offspring survival under predation risk in the moorfrog. J Evol Biol 16:1288–1295 Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton Simmons LW, Emlen DJ (2006) Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16346–16351 Takahata N (1981) Genetic variability and rate of gene substitution in a finite population under mutation and fluctuating selection. Genetics 98:427–440 Tallamy DW, Darlington MB, Pesek JD, Powell BE (2003) Copulatory courtship signals male genetic quality in cucumber beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:77–82 Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19:323–328 Van Homrigh A, Higgie M, McGuigan K, Blows MW (2007) The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection. Curr Biol 17:528–532 van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142 Welch AM (2003) Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57:883–893 Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC (1998) Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280:1928–1930 Wilson AJ, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG, Coltman DW, Mifsud DV, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB (2006) Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution. PLoS Biol 4:1270–1275 Zeng ZB, Cockerham CC (1993) Mutation models and quantitative genetic-variation. Genetics 133:729–736 Zhang XS, Hill WG (2005) Genetic variability under mutation selection balance. Trends Ecol Evol 20:468–470