Mass weighted urn design — A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations

Contemporary Clinical Trials - Tập 43 - Trang 209-216 - 2015
Wenle Zhao1
1Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 305H, Charleston, SC 29425, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Rosenberger, 2002 Piantadosi, 2005 Berry, 2011 Hu, 2006 Dunnett, 1955, A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 50, 1096, 10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 Connor, 2013, Bayesian adaptive trials for comparative effectiveness research: an example in status epilepticus, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 66, S130, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.015 Dumville, 2006, The use of unequal randomization ratios in clinical trials: a review, Contemp. Clin. Trials, 27, 1, 10.1016/j.cct.2005.08.003 Berger, 2005 McEntegart, 2003, Forced randomization: when using interactive voice response systems, Appl. Clin. Trials, 12, 50 Zhao, 2013, Selection bias, allocation concealment and randomization design in clinical trials, Contemp. Clin. Trials, 36, 263, 10.1016/j.cct.2013.07.005 Berger, 2003, Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures, Stat. Med., 22, 3017, 10.1002/sim.1538 Salama, 2008, Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences, Stat. Med., 27, 1421, 10.1002/sim.3014 Kuznetsova, 2011, Brick tunnel randomization for unequal allocation to two or more treatment groups, Stat. Med., 30, 812, 10.1002/sim.4167 Kuznetsova, 2014, Wide brick tunnel randomization — an unequal allocation procedure that limits the imbalance in treatment totals, Stat. Med., 33, 1514, 10.1002/sim.6051 Zhao, 2011, Block urn design — a new randomization algorithm for sequential trilas with two or more treatments and balanced or unbalanced allocation, Contemp. Clin. Trials, 32, 953, 10.1016/j.cct.2011.08.004 Zhao, 2012, Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness, Pharm. Stat., 11, 39, 10.1002/pst.493 Zhao, 2014, A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials, Stat. Med., 33, 5239, 10.1002/sim.6266 Wei, 1978, An application of an urn model to the design of sequential controlled clinical trials, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 73, 559, 10.1080/01621459.1978.10480054 Kuznetsova, 2012, Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation, Stat. Med., 31, 701, 10.1002/sim.4447 Blackwell, 1957, Design for the control of selection bias, Ann. Math. Stat., 28, 449, 10.1214/aoms/1177706973 Zhao, 2011, A simplified formula for quantification of the probability of deterministic assignments in permuted block randomization, J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 141, 474, 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.06.023 Friedman, 1949, A simple urn model, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 2, 59, 10.1002/cpa.3160020103 Chen, 2000, Which design is better? Ehrenfest urn versus biased coin, Adv. Appl. Probab., 32, 738, 10.1239/aap/1013540242 Yuan, 2008, Optimal adaptive generalized Pόlya urn design for multi-arm clinical trials, J. Multivar. Anal., 99, 1, 10.1016/j.jmva.2006.12.004