Market for former Andersen clients: Evidence from government and non-profit sectors

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy - Tập 27 - Trang 394-408 - 2008
Thomas E. Vermeer1
1Department of Accounting and Information Systems, University of Baltimore, 1420 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anheier, 1997, The implications of government funding of non-profit organizations: Three propositions, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10, 190, 10.1108/09513559710166057 Asthana, S., Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., 2003. Audit firm reputation and client stock price reactions: Evidence from the Enron experience. Working paper, Temple University. Barton, 2005, Who cares about auditor reputation?, Contemporary Accounting Research, 22, 549, 10.1506/C27U-23K8-E1VL-20R0 Beattie, 2001, The determinants of audit fees – evidence from the voluntary sector, Accounting and Business Research, 31, 243, 10.1080/00014788.2001.9729619 Better Business Bureau, 2003. Standards for charity accountability. Better Business Bureau, Arlington, VA. Blouin, 2007, An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients, The Accounting Review, 82, 621, 10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.621 Brown, 1995, Audit quality in audits of federal programs by non-federal auditors, Accounting Horizons, 9, 1 Brown, 2005, Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 317, 10.1002/nml.71 Burns, 2001, Auditors charged with securities fraud over work for Pennsylvania nonprofit, Wall Street Journal, 238, 18 Cahan, 2006, After Enron: Auditor conservatism and ex-Andersen clients, The Accounting Review, 81, 49, 10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.49 Chaney, 2002, Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure, Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1221, 10.1111/1475-679X.00087 Chang, C., Chi, W., Liu, C., 2003. Client characteristics and auditor switch in an audit failure. Working paper, National Chengchi University. Colson, 2004, Public accountability: An interview with New York state comptroller Alan Hevesi, The CPA Journal, 74, 18 DeAngelo, 1981, Auditor size and audit quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183, 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1 DeFond, 1992, The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 11, 16 Francis, 1988, Auditor change: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation, The Accounting Review, 63, 663 General Accounting Office (GAO), 2003. Accounting firm consolidation. GAO-03-1158. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Gordon, 1999, Tax-exempt organization financial data: Availability and limitations, Accounting Horizons, 13, 113, 10.2308/acch.1999.13.2.113 Harris, 1985 Independent Sector, 2002. Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference. Independent Sector, Washington, DC. Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Johnson, 1990, The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary auditor changes, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12, 281, 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90051-5 Kaufman, 2006, Student derivative lawsuits, The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1471, 10.2307/20455659 Keating, 2005, The single audit act: How compliant are nonprofit organizations?, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17, 285, 10.1108/JPBAFM-17-03-2005-B002 Kohlbeck, M., Mayhew, B., Murphy, P., Wilkins, M., 2006. Competition for Andersen’s clients. Working paper, Florida Atlantic University. Available at SSRN: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=900130>. Krishnamurthy, 2006, Auditor reputation, auditor independence and the stock-market impact of Andersen’s indictment on its client firms, Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 465, 10.1506/14P1-5QRR-1NAF-3CE1 Krishnan, 1996, The simultaneous relation between auditor switching and audit opinion: An empirical analysis, Accounting and Business Research, 26, 224, 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729513 Landsman, W., Nelson, K., Rountree, B., 2005. An empirical analysis of big n auditor switches. Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Nichols, 1983, Auditor credibility and auditor changes, Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 534, 10.2307/2490789 Pfeffer, 1978 Public Accounting Report (PAR), June 30, 2002. Special Section: Guilty verdict for Andersen 26(12), 3–8. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), 2002. Public Law No. 107-204. GPO, Washington, DC. Schwartz, 1985, Auditor switches by failing firms, The Accounting Review, 60, 248 Tate, 2007, Auditor change and auditor choice in nonprofit organizations, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26, 47, 10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.47 US Census Bureau, 2003. State and local government finances by level of government and by state: 2003–2004. Available at <http://www.census.gov/govs/www/estimate.html>. US Census Bureau, 2006. Public employment data – state and local governments. Available at <http://ftp2.census.gov/govs/apes/06stlus.txt>. Vermeer, 2006, The composition of non-profit audit committees, Accounting Horizons, 20, 75, 10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.75 Vermeer, T., Rama, D., Raghunandan, K., 2006b. Audit fees for former Andersen clients: A note. Working paper, University of Baltimore. Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2005. Bids and offers, C4. Watts, 1978, Towards a positive accounting theory of the determination of accounting standards, The Accounting Review, 53, 112 Wells, 2005, Senate hearing probes tax abuse by charity groups, Wall Street Journal, 245, D2