Market entry, privatization and bank performance in transition1

Wiley - Tập 14 Số 4 - Trang 579-610 - 2006
Steven Fries1, Damien Neven2, Paul Seabright3, Anita Taci4
1European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, One Exchange Square, London EC2A 2JN, UK. E‐mail: [email protected]
2Graduate Institute of International Studies, University of Geneva, and CEPR
3Université de Toulouse I and CEPR
4European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Tóm tắt

Abstract

This paper examines how market entry and privatization have affected the margins and marginal costs of banks in the post‐communist transition. We estimate bank revenue and cost functions, allowing the estimated parameters to change over time. In the first sub‐period (1995–98), we find that privatized banks earned higher margins than other banks, while foreign start‐ups had lower marginal costs. In the third sub‐period (2002–2004), foreign banks remained low marginal cost service providers, while privatized domestic banks had the widest margins. Subtracting marginal costs from margins to calculate mark‐ups, an indication of demand for services, shows that initially privatized banks had the largest mark‐ups. However, by the third sub‐period, differences among private banks diminished. In comparison to private banks, state banks persistently under‐performed in controlling costs and attracting demand. Our evidence therefore indicates that foreign bank entry promoted lower costs and that privatization and market entry encouraged more demand for services.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson R. W., 1996, Banking Sector Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Forum Report of the Economic Policy Initiative

10.1016/0304-4076(81)90026-9

Baltagi B. H., 1995, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data

10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00010-1

10.1257/0895330027120

Bikker J. A., 2000, ‘Competition and concentration in the EU banking industry’, Kredit und Kapital, 33, 62

10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00205-4

10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.015

10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02005-4

10.1353/mcb.2004.0044

10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00117-X

Dermigüç‐Kunt A., 2004, ). ‘Regulations, market structure, institutions and the cost of intermediation’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 593

10.1016/S0161-8938(03)00027-9

Drakos K., 2005, ‘Competition and contestability in transition banking: An empirical analysis’, South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2, 183

EBRD, 1998, Transition Report 1998: Financial Sector in Transition

10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.016

10.1016/j.ememar.2003.12.002

Grigorian D.andManole V.(2002).‘Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition: An application of data envelopment analysis’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2850 June Washington DC:The World Bank.

10.1016/S0147-5967(03)00021-0

10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00328-X

10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00068-4

10.2307/2098582

Shaffer S., 1982, Proceedings of a Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, 225

10.4159/harvard.9780674433403

10.2307/2527133

10.1016/0304-4076(94)01645-G

Yildirim H. S.andPhilippatos G. C.(2006a). ‘Bank efficiency: Evidence from the transition economies of Europe’ European Journal of Finance forthcoming.

Yildirim H. S.andPhilippatos G. C.(2006b). ‘Competition and contestability in CEE banking industry’ Managerial Finance forthcoming.