Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Combining Energy System Modelling and Decomposition Analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Committee on Climate Change. (2008). Building a low-carbon economy—the UK’s contribution to tackling climate change. London: Committee on Climate Change.
Carmel, A. (2008). Paying for mitigation—the GLOCAF model. Bali: Paper presented at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change COP 13.
HM Government. Department of Trade and Industry. (2007). Meeting the energy challenge: a white paper on energy. London: Stationery Office.
HM Government (2009). Analytical annex—the UK low carbon transition plan. London: HM Government.
Blok, K., Worrell, E., Cuelenaere, R., & Turkenburg, W. (1993). The cost effectiveness of CO2 emission reduction achieved by energy conservation. Energy Policy, 21(6), 656–667. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(93)90289-R .
Kennedy, M. (2010). Ireland’s future: a low carbon economy? The impact of green stimulus investment. Vilnius: IAEE European Conference.
Kiuila, O., & Rutherford, T. F. (2010). Abatement options and climate policy choices. Stockholm: International Energy Workshop.
Poswiata, J., & Bogdan, W. (2009). Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions abatement potential in Poland by 2030. Warsaw: McKinsey.
Sweeney, J., Weyant, J., Chan, T. T., Chowdhary, R., Gillingham, K., Guy, A., et al. (2008). Analysis of Measures to Meet the Requirements of California’s Assembly Bill 32. Stanford: Precourt Institute for Energy Efficiency, Standford University.
Grubb, M., Edmonds, J., ten Brick, P., & Morrison, M. (1993). The costs of limiting fossil–fuel CO2 emissions: a survey and analysis. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18, 397–478.
Nauclér, T., & Enkvist, P. A. (2009). Pathways to a low-carbon economy—version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. In McKinsey & Company (Ed.).
Kesicki, F., & Ekins, P. (2012). Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. Climate Policy, 12, 219–236.
McKitrick, R. (1999). A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(3), 306–314.
Klepper, G., & Peterson, S. (2006). Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(1), 1–23.
Morris, J., Paltsev, S., & Reilly, J. (2012). Marginal abatement costs and marginal welfare costs for greenhouse gas emissions reductions: results from the EPPA model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment. doi: 10.1007/s10666-011-9298-7 .
Hourcade, J.-C., Halsnaes, K., Jaccard, M., Montgomery, W. D., Richels, R., Robinson, J., et al. (1995). A review of mitigation cost studies. In J. J. Houghton, L. G. Meiro Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, & K. Maskell (Eds.), Climate change 1995: contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellerman, A. D., & Decaux, A. (1998). Analysis of post-Kyoto CO 2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
van Vuuren, D. P., de Vries, B., Eickhout, B., & Kram, T. (2004). Responses to technology and taxes in a simulated world. Energy Economics, 26(4), 579–601.
Blok, K., de Jager, D., Hendriks, C., Kouvaritakis, N., & Mantzos, L. (2001). Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change — Comparison of ‘Top-down’ and ‘Bottom-up’. In DG Environment European Commission (Ed.), Analysis of Emission Reduction Opportunities for CO 2 in European Union. Brussels: Ecofys Energy and Environment, National Technical University of Athens.
Kesicki, F. (2010). Marginal abatement cost curves for policy making—expert-based vs. model-derived curves. Rio de Janeiro: Paper presented at the IAEE’s 2010 International Conference.
Stoft, S. (1995). The economics of conserved-energy ‘supply’ curves. Energy Journal, 16(4), 109–140.
Loulou, R., Goldstein, G., & Noble, K. (2004). Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme.
Kannan, R. (2009). Uncertainties in key low carbon power generation technologies—implication for UK decarbonisation targets. Applied Energy, 86(10), 1873–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.014 .
Strachan, N., Pye, S., & Kannan, R. (2009). The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy. Energy Policy, 37(3), 850–860. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.096 .
Anandarajah, G., & Strachan, N. (2010). Interactions and implications of renewable and climate change policy on UK energy scenarios. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6724–6735. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.042 .
Strachan, N., Kannan, R., & Pye, S. (2008). Scenarios and sensitivities on long-term UK carbon reductions using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL-macro energy system models. London: UKERC.
Kannan, R., Strachan, N., Balta-Ozkan, N., & Pye, S. (2007). UK MARKAL model documentation. www.ukerc.ac.uk . Accessed 18 Nov 2010.
Ang, B. W., & Zhang, F. Q. (2000). A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy, 25(12), 1149–1176.
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Orkopoulos, D., & Papayannakis, L. (2006). A bottom-up decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Greece. Energy, 31(14), 2638–2651.
Shrestha, R. M., Anandarajah, G., & Liyanage, M. H. (2009). Factors affecting CO2 emission from the power sector of selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2375–2384.
Ang, B. W. (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy, 32(9), 1131–1139.
Divisia, F. (1925). L’indice monétaire et la théorie de la monnaie. Revue d’économie politique, 39(5), 980–1008.
Vartia, Y. (1976). Ideal log-change index numbers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 3(3), 121–126.
Montgomery, J. K. (1937). The mathematical problem of the price index. London: King.
Ang, B. W., Zhang, F. Q., & Choi, K.-H. (1998). Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy, 23(6), 489–495.
Ang, B. W., & Liu, N. (2007). Energy decomposition analysis: IEA model versus other models. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1426–1432.
Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010). Provisional 2009 results for UK greenhouse gas emissions and progress towards targets. London.