Maps as geomedial action spaces: considering the shift from logocentric to egocentric engagements

GeoJournal - 2015
Pablo Abend1, Francis Harvey2
1Institute for Media Culture und Theatre, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
2Leibniz-Institute for Regional Geography and University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Tóm tắt

This paper considers some significant questions in geography and cognate fields about the roles of maps in the information age. Most maps are now digital products, offering immersive environments for user involvement. The increasingly networked digital distribution of geographic information in consumer-orientated cartographic representations leads to substantial changes how people individually and collaboratively experience and produce space and place. This article focuses on the ongoing metamorphosis arising through geobrowsing, the media-based flexible production of geographic knowledge through interactive maps. Drawing on work in media studies influenced by the so-called spatial turn—the rediscovering of geography-related questions in the social sciences and humanities, after modernism’s claimed prioritization of time and history (Soja in Postmodern Geographies. The reassertion of space in critical social theory, London, 1989; Jameson in Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism, Duke University Press, Durham, 1991)—this paper develops a theoretical framework built on the dynamic networked geomedial action spaces concept to understand the changing roles of information age maps as imagined materialist spaces for the experience and production of space—ultimately a medial turn. Following this concept, maps change from offering static and non-interactive frames of geographic reference for the production of space and place and as geomedia support a veritable infinity of interactive and map-based activities. Geobrowsing facilitates some new modes of geographic interactions that move from logocentric engagements with static maps to egocentric dynamic interactions with code-based elements of geomedial action spaces. Google Earth and similar geomedia facilitate maps that become intrinsic to a growing number of social action spaces and alter the experience and production of space and place.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Abend, P. (2013). Geobrowsing: Google Earth und Co.—Nutzungspraktiken einer digitalen Erde. Transcript, Bielefeld. Abend, P., Thielmann, T., Ewerth, R., Seiler, D., Mühling, M., Döring, J., et al. (2012). Geobrowsing behavior in Google Earth. In T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, & G. Griesebner (Eds.), GI_Forum 2012: Geovisualization, society and learning (pp. 2–13). Berlin: Wichmann. Aitken, S. C., & Crane, J. (2009). Affektive Geovisualisierung. In J. Döring & T. Thielmann (Eds.), Mediengeographie (pp. 481–488). Bielefeld: Transcript. Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Azocar Fernandez, P. I., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2014). Paradigms in cartography. A epistemological review of the 20th and 21st centuries. Berlin: Springer. Banks, J. (2013). Co-creating videogames. London, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing. Begall, S., Červený, J., Neef, J., Vojtčch, O., & Burda, H. (2008). Magnetic alignment in grazing and resting cattle and deer. PNAS, 105(36), 13451–13455. Benjamin, W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217–251). New York, NY: Schocken Books. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of immersion in games. In CHI 2004 (pp. 1297–1300). Burda, H., Begall, S., Červený, J., Neef, J., & Nemec, P. (2009). Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants. PNAS, 106(14), 5708–5713. Calleja, G. (2011). In-game. from immersion to incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Caquard, S. (2011). Cartography I: Mapping narrative cartography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 135–144. Caquard, S. (2014). Cartography II: Collective cartographies in the social media era. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 141–150. Cartwright, W. E. (2010a). Exploring space: Lessons from applying interactive integrated media for visualising geography. The Globe, 64(1), 1–16. Cartwright, W. E. (2010b). Addressing the value of art in cartographic communication. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(3), 294–299. Cartwright, W. E., & Hunter, G. J. (2001). Towards a methodology for the evaluation of multimedia geographical information products. GeoInformatica, 5(3), 291–315. Dodge, M., Perkins, C., & Kitchin, R. (2009). Mapping modes, methods and moments: a manifesto for map studies. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & C. Perkins (Eds.), Rethinking maps (pp. 220–243). London: Routledge. Döring, J., & Thielmann, T. (2008). Spatial turn. Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften. Bielefeld: Transcript. Döring, J., & Thielmann, T. (2009). Mediengeographie. Theorie–Analyse–Diskussion. Bielefeld: Transcript. Farman, J. (2011). Mobile interface theory. Routledge, NY: Embodied space and locative media. Felgenhauer, T., & Quade, D. (2012). Society and geomedia. Some reflections from a social theory perspective. In T. Jekel, A. Car, J. Strobl, & G. Griesebner (Eds.), GI_Forum 2012: Geovisualization, society and learning (pp. 74–82). Berlin: Wichmann. Gartner, G. (2009). Web mapping 2.0. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & Ch. R. Perkins (Eds.), Rethinking maps (pp. 68–82). London: Routledge. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors. The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. Goodchild, M. F. (2008). What does Google Earth mean for the social sciences? In M. Dodge, M. McDerby, & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization: Concepts, tools and applications (pp. 11–23). Chichester/Hoboken: Wiley. Harley, J. B. (1988). Silences and secrecy: The Hidden Agenda of cartography in early modern Europe. Imago Mundi, 40(1), 55–76. Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20. Harvey F, 2012 Are there fundamental principles in Geographic Information Science? USA: Tobler Lecture Event 2012 of the Association of American Geographers Geographic Information Systems and Science Specialty Group, CreateSpace, Independent Publishing Platform. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press. Kehlmann, D. (2005). Fingerreisen. Du–Zeitschrift für Kultur, 11(12), 20–21. Kingsbury, P., & Jones, J. P., III (2009). Walter Benjamin’s Dionysian adventures on Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 502–513. Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage. McHaffie, P. (1995). Manufacturing metaphors: Public cartography, the Market, and Democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth. The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 113–129). New York, NY: Guilford Press. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. The extension of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Montello, D. R. (2002). Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century, theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29(3), 283–304. Morrison, J. L. (1997). Topographic mapping for the twenty first century. In D. Rhind (Ed.), Framework for the world (pp. 14–27). Cambridge, MA: Wiley. November, V., Camacho-Hübner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D, 28(4), 581–599. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0. 30 September, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press. Perkins, C. (2006). Cultures of everyday map collecting. Sheetlines, 76, 29–32. Perkins, C. (2008). Cultures of map use. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 150–158. Peuquet, D., & Kraak, M.-J. (2002). Geobrowsing: Creative thinking and knowledge discovery using geographic visualization. Information Visualization, 1(1), 80–91. Pickles, J. (Ed.). (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographical information systems. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge Chapman & Hall. Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Rammert, W. (1993). Technik aus soziologischer Perspektive Bd.1 Forschungsstand, Theorieansätze, Fallbeispiele (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Opladen). Rammert, W., Böhm, W., & Olscha, C. (1991). Vom Umgang mit Computern im Alltag. Fallstudien zur Kultivierung einer neuen Technik (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Opladen). Scharl, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The geospatial web. London: Springer. Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence, 6(6), 603–616. Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies. The reassertion of space in critical social theory (London/New York). Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blackwell. Suchman, L. A. (1999). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Sutton, J. (2008). Material agency, skills, and history: distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In L. Malafouris & C. Knappett (Eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 37–55). Berlin: Springer. Thielmann, T. (2010). Locative media and mediated localities. Aether: The Journal of Media Geography, 5, 1–17. Thielmann, T., Van der Velden, L., Fischer, F., & Vogler, R. (2012). Dwelling in the web: Towards a Googlization of space. HIIG discussion paper no. 3, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2151949. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory. Space, politics, affect. London, NY: Routledge. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. Turnbull, D. (2007). Maps narratives and trails: Performativity, hodology and distributed knowledges in complex adaptive systems—an approach to emergent mapping. Geographical Research, 45(2), 140–149. Turner, A. J. (2006a). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Short cuts. Turner, P. (2006b). Affordance as context. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 787–800. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization, perceptual and motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. Verhoeff, N. (2012). Mobile screens. The visual regime of navigation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The spatial turn. Interdisciplinary perspectives. London, NY: Routledge. Wilken, R., & Goggin, G. (2012). Mobile technology and place. New York, NY: Routledge. Winter, G., Schröter, J., & Barck, J. (2009). Das Raumbild. Eine Einleitung. In G. Winter, J. Schröter, & J. Barck (Eds.), Das Raumbild (pp. 7–18). Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. Wirth, W., & Hofer, M. (2008). Präsenzerleben, Eine medienpsychologische Modellierung. Montage/av, 17(2), 159–175. Wood, D., & Fels, J. (1992). The power of maps. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38(6), 1322–1343.