Mapping forests with Lidar provides flexible, accurate data with many uses

California Agriculture - Tập 69 Số 1 - Trang 14-20 - 2015
Maggi Kelly1, Stefania Di Tommaso2
1M. Kelly is UC Cooperative Extension Specialist and Professor in the Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management Department, and Faculty Director of the Geospatial Innovation Facility in the College of Natural Resources at UC Berkeley
2S. Di Tommaso is Staff Researcher in the Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management Department at UC Berkeley.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arvola TF. 1978.California Forestry Handbook.State of California, Resources Agency Department of Forestry, Sacramento, CA.

Blanchard, 2011, Object-based image analysis of downed logs in a disturbed forest landscape using Lidar, Remote Sens, 3, 2420, 10.3390/rs3112420

Chen, 2010, Retrieving vegetation height of forests and woodlands over mountainous areas in the Pacific Coast region using satellite laser altimetry, Remote Sens Environ, 114, 1610, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.016

Chen, 2006, Isolating individual trees in a savanna woodland using small footprint LIDAR data, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 72, 923, 10.14358/PERS.72.8.923

Chen, 2007, Estimating basal area and stem volume for individual trees from Lidar data, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 73, 1355, 10.14358/PERS.73.12.1355

Chen, 2012, Integration of airborne Lidar and vegetation types derived from aerial photography for mapping aboveground live biomass, Remote Sens Environ, 121, 108, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.021

Colwell, 1964, Aerial photography — A valuable sensor for the scientist, Am Sci, 52, 16

Colwell, 1965, The extraction of data from aerial photographs by human and mechanical means, Photogrammetria, 20, 211, 10.1016/0031-8663(65)90013-X

Colwell, 1973, Remote sensing as an aid to the management of Earth resources, Am Sci, 61, 175

Cracknell, 1998, Review article: Synergy in remote sensing — What's in a pixel?, Int J Remote Sens, 19, 2025, 10.1080/014311698214848

Dubayah, 2000, Lidar remote sensing for forestry, J Forest, 98, 44, 10.1093/jof/98.6.44

Fisher, 1997, The pixel: A snare and a delusion, Int J Remote Sens, 18, 679, 10.1080/014311697219015

Franklin, 2000, Multiattribute vegetation maps of forest service lands in California supporting resource management decisions, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 66, 1209

Fritz, 1996, Commercial Earth observation satellites, Int Arch Photogrammetry Remote Sens, 31, 273

Garcia-Feced, 2011, Characterizing California spotted owl nest sites and their associated forest stands using Lidar data, J Forest, 108, 436

Gong, 1999, Photo ecometrics for forest inventory, Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 5, 9

Gong, 2000, The potential of digital surface model for hardwood rangeland monitoring, J Range Manage, 53, 622, 10.2307/4003157

Gonzalez, 2010, Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, QuickBird, and field measurements in California, Remote Sens Environ, 114, 1561, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.011

Gregory, 1971, Earth-observation satellites: A potential impetus for economic and social development, World Cartogr, 11, 1

Guo, 2010, Effects of topographic variability and Lidar sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 76, 701, 10.14358/PERS.76.6.701

Hummel, 2011, A comparison of accuracy and cost of LiDAR versus stand exam data for landscape management on the Malheur National Forest, J Forest, 109, 267, 10.1093/jof/109.5.267

Hyde, 2005, Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform Lidar: Validation of montane ecosystems, Remote Sens Environ, 96, 427, 10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.005

Hyde, 2006, Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy, Remote Sens Environ, 102, 63, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.021

Jakubowski, 2013, Predicting surface fuel models and fuel metrics using Lidar and imagery in dense, mountainous forest, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 79, 37, 10.14358/PERS.79.1.37

Jakubowski, 2013, Tradeoffs between Lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy, Remote Sens Environ, 130, 245, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.024

Jakubowski, 2013, Delineating individual trees from Lidar data: A comparison of vector- and raster-based segmentation approaches, Remote Sens, 5, 4163, 10.3390/rs5094163

Jenkins, 2003, National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species, Forest Sci, 49, 12, 10.1093/forestscience/49.1.12

Kane, 2013, Landscape-scale effects of fire severity on mixed-conifer and red fir forest structure in Yosemite National Park, Forest Ecol Manag, 287, 17, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.044

Kane, 2013, Assessing fire effects on forest spatial structure using a fusion of Landsat and airborne LiDAR data in Yosemite National Park, Remote Sens Environ, 151, 89, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.041

Lauer, 1997, The Landsat program: Its origins, evolution, and impacts, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 63, 831

Lefsky, 2010, A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System, Geophys Res Lett, 37, L15401, 10.1029/2010GL043622

Li, 2012, A new method for segmenting individual trees from the Lidar point cloud, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 78, 75, 10.14358/PERS.78.1.75

Lim, 2003, LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure, Prog Phys Geog, 27, 88, 10.1191/0309133303pp360ra

Lu, 2012, Aboveground forest biomass estimation with Landsat and Lidar data and uncertainty analysis of the estimates, Int J Forest Res, 10.1155/2012/436537

Peterson B, Dubayah R, Hyde P, et al. 2005. Use of LIDAR for forest inventory and forest management application. In: Proc Seventh Ann Forest Inventory Anal Symp, October 3–6, 2005. Portland, ME. p 193–202.

Renslow M, Greenfield P, Guay T. 2000. Evaluation of Multi-Return LIDAR for Forestry Applications. RSAC-2060/4810-LSP-0001-RPT1. USDA Forest Service – Engineering. Remote Sensing Applications Center.

Reutebuch, 2005, Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): An emerging tool for multiple resource inventory, J Forest, 103, 286, 10.1093/jof/103.6.286

Richardson, 2011, Strengths and limitations of assessing forest density and spatial configuration with aerial LiDAR, Remote Sens Environ, 115, 2640, 10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.020

Running, 2004, A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production, BioScience, 54, 547, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO;2

Sheng, 2001, Model-based conifer-crown surface reconstruction from high-resolution aerial images, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 67, 957

Sheng, 2003, True orthoimage production for forested areas from large-scale aerial photographs, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 69, 259, 10.14358/PERS.69.3.259

Strahler, 1981, Stratification of natural vegetation for forest and rangeland inventory using Landsat digital imagery and collateral data, Int J Remote Sens, 2, 15, 10.1080/01431168108948338

Swatantran, 2011, Mapping biomass and stress in the Sierra Nevada using Lidar and hyperspectral data fusion, Remote Sens Environ, 115, 2917, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.027

Tang, 2014, Deriving and validating Leaf Area Index (LAI) at multiple spatial scales through Lidar remote sensing: A case study in Sierra National Forest, CA, Remote Sens Environ, 143, 131, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.007

White, 2010, Forest roads mapped using LiDAR in steep forested terrain, Remote Sens, 2, 1120, 10.3390/rs2041120

Wulder, 2008, The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management, Forest Chron, 84, 807, 10.5558/tfc84807-6

Wulder, 2003, Operational mapping of the land cover of the forested area of Canada with Landsat data: EOSD land cover program, Forest Chron, 79, 1075, 10.5558/tfc791075-6

Wulder, 2012, Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review, Remote Sens Environ, 121, 196, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.001

Wynne, 2006, Lidar remote sensing of forest resources and the scale of management, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 72, 1310

Zhao, 2012, Allometric equation choice impacts Lidar-based forest biomass estimates: A case study from the Sierra National Forest, CA, Agr Forest Meteorol, 165, 64, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.019

Zhao, 2012, Characterizing habitats associated with fisher den structures in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, using discrete return Lidar, Forest Ecol Manag, 280, 112, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.005

Zhao, 2013, A comparison of foliage profiles in the Sierra National Forest obtained with a full-waveform under-canopy EVI Lidar system with the foliage profiles obtained with an airborne full-waveform LVIS Lidar system, Remote Sens Environ, 136, 330, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.05.020