Managing supply and demand of ecosystem services in dryland catchments

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability - Tập 48 - Trang 10-16 - 2021
Yongping Wei1, Shuanglei Wu1, Chong Jiang2,3,1, Xiaoming Feng4
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
2Guangdong Open Laboratory of Geospatial Information Technology and Application, Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou, 510070, PR China
3Key Lab of Guangdong for Utilization of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, Guangzhou 510070, PR China
4State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, PR China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

de Groot, 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecol Complex, 7, 260, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005, 1

McDonald, 2009, Ecosystem service demand and supply along the urban-to-rural gradient, J Conserv Plann, 5, 1

Paetzold, 2010, A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services, Ecol Complex, 7, 273, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003

Geijzendorffer, 2015, Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments, Ecol Indic, 52, 320, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016

Mensah, 2017, Ecosystem service importance and use vary with socio-environmental factors: a study from household-surveys in local communities of South Africa, Ecosyst Serv, 23, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.018

Castro, 2016, Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management, JAWRA, 52, 209

Lähtinen, 2016, Biodiversity and ecosystem services in supply chain management in the global forest industry, Ecosyst Serv, 21, 130, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.006

Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0

Burkhard, 2012, Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecol Indic, 21, 17, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019

Dallimer, 2015, Historical influences on the current provision of multiple ecosystem services, Glob Environ Change, 31, 307, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.015

Tomscha, 2016, Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history, Ecol Soc, 21, 43, 10.5751/ES-08345-210143

Gissi, 2015, Ecosystem services: building informed policies to orient landscape dynamics, Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage, 11, 185, 10.1080/21513732.2015.1071939

Yahdjian, 2015, Rangeland ecosystem services: shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand, Front Ecol Environ, 13, 44, 10.1890/140156

Wolff, 2015, Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives, Ecol Ind, 55, 159, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016

Geertsema, 2016, Actionable knowledge for ecological intensification of agriculture, Front Ecol Environ, 14, 209, 10.1002/fee.1258

Reynolds, 2007, Global desertification: building a science for dryland development, Science, 316, 847, 10.1126/science.1131634

Estell, 2012, Increasing shrub use by livestock in a world with less grass, Rangel Ecol Manage, 65, 327, 10.2111/REM-D-11-00124.1

Sala, 1997, Ecosystem services in grasslands

Norman, 2005

Zhao, 2018, Metacoupling supply and demand for soil conservation service, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 33, 136, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.011

Feng, 2016, Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits, Nat Clim Change, 6, 1019, 10.1038/nclimate3092

Fu, 2017, Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China, Annu Rev Earth Plant Sci, 45, 223, 10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020552

Fang, 2015, Landscape service capability, landscape service flow and landscape service demand: a new framework for landscape services and its use for landscape sustainability assessment, Prog Phys Geog, 39, 817, 10.1177/0309133315613019

García-Nieto, 2013, Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries, Ecosyst Serv, 4, 126, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003

Schulp, 2014, Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: demand and supply of pollination in the European Union, Ecol Indic, 36, 131, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014

Spangenberg, 2014, The ecosystem service cascade: further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy, Ecol Econ, 104, 22, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025

Villamagna, 2013, Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery, Ecol Complex, 15, 114, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004

Crossman, 2013, A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services, Ecosyst Serv, 4, 4, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

Lu, 2018, Incorporating social processes in hydrological models, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 33, 42, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.011