Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK

Research Policy - Tập 33 - Trang 89-106 - 2004
Steven Casper1, Richard Whitley2
1Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Road, Cambridge CB2 1AG, UK
2Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester M15 6PB, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adelberger, 2000, Semi-sovereign leadership? The state’s role in German biotechnology and venture capital growth, German Politics, 9, 103, 10.1080/09644000008404582 Almeida, 1999, Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks, Management Science, 45, 905, 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 Arthur, B., 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. Bahrami, 1995, Flexible re-cycling and high technology entrepreneurship, California Management Review, 37, 62, 10.2307/41165799 Breschi, S., Malerba, F., 1997. Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In: Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London, pp. 130–155. Casper, 2000, Institutional adaptiveness, technology policy, and the diffusion of new business models: the case of German biotechnology, Organization Studies, 21, 887, 10.1177/0170840600215003 Casper, S., 2003. The German Internet economy and the Silicon Valley model: convergence, divergence, or something else? In: Kogut, B. (Ed.), The Global Internet Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Casper, 2001, Economic organization, innovation systems, and the Internet, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17, 265, 10.1093/oxrep/17.2.265 Casper, 2001, National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors, Industry and Innovation, 8, 5, 10.1080/13662710120034383 Casper, S., Murray, F., 2003. Commercialising science: how the organization of scientific labour markets impacts the development of biotech clusters. In: Proceedings of the Social Construction of Clusters Conference, Visby, Sweden. Casper, S., Vitols, S., 2002. Managing competences within entrepreneurial technologies: a comparative institutional analysis of software firms in Germany and the United Kingdom. In: Proceedings of the Presentation of Paper at the 2002 Council of Europeanist Conference, Chicago. Casper, 1999, Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany: institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries, Industry and Innovation, 6, 6, 10.1080/13662719900000002 Cooke, P., 1999. Biotechnology Clusters in the UK: Lessons from Localisation in the Commercialisation of Science. Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff. Deutsche Bundesbank, 1998. Monthly Report. April. Dosi, 1988, Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120 Ernst & Young, 1999. European Life Sciences 1999. Ernst & Young International, London. Ernst & Young, 2001. European Life Sciences 2001. Ernst & Young International, London. Gambardella, A., 1995. Science and Innovation: The US Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Glimstedt, 2001, Competitive dynamics of technological standardization: the case of third generation cellular communications, Industry and Innovation, 8, 49, 10.1080/13662710120034400 Glimstedt, H., Zander, U., 2003. Sweden’s wireless wonders: defining the Swedish Internet economy. In: Kogut, B. (Ed.), The Global Internet Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Hall, P., Soskice, D., 2001. Introduction. In: Hall, P., Soskice, D. (Ed.), Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Henderson, R., Orsenigo, L., Pisano, G., 1999. The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: interactions among scientific, institutional and organizational change. In: Mowery, D., Nelson, R. (Ed.), Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 267–311. Hobday, 2000, The project-based organization: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?, Research Policy, 29, 871, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4 Katzenstein, P., 1989. Stability and change in the emerging third republic. In: Katzenstein, P. (Ed.), Industry and Politics in West Germany. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Kenney, M. (Ed.), 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto. King, D., Wood, S., 1999. The political economy of neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the 19890s. In: Kitschelt, H., et al. (Eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 371–391. Kitschelt, 1991, Industrial governance, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: sectoral governance or cross-national comparative analysis?, International Organization, 45, 453, 10.1017/S002081830003318X Lehrer, 2000, Has Germany finally solved its high-tech problem? The recent boom in German technology-based entrepreneurism, California Management Review, 42, 89, 10.2307/41166055 Malerba, 1993, Technological regimes and firm behaviour, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 45, 10.1093/icc/2.1.45 Miller, G., 1992. Managerial Dilemmas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Monks, R., Minow, N., 1995. Corporate Governance. Blackwell, London. Nooteboom, 2000, Institutions and forms of cooperation, Organization Studies, 21, 915, 10.1177/0170840600215004 Penan, 1996, R&D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic strategies, Research Policy, 25, 337, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00833-0 Perrow, C., 1985. Normal Accidents. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Pontusson, 1996, Labour markets, production strategies, and wage bargaining institutions: the Swedish employer offensive in comparative perspective, Comparative Political Studies, 29, 223, 10.1177/0010414096029002004 Rabinow, P., 1996. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Senker, 1996, National systems of innovation, organizational learning and industrial biotechnology, Technovation, 16, 219, 10.1016/0166-4972(95)00069-0 Shapiro, C., Varian, H., 1999. Information Rules. HBS Press, Cambridge. Soskice, 1997, German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks, Industry and Innovation, 4, 75, 10.1080/13662719700000005 Soskice, D., 1999. Divergent production regimes: coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In: Kitschelt, H., et al. (Eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Streeck, W., 1984. Industrial Relations in West Germany: A Case Study of the Car Industry. St. Martin’s Press, New York. Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 Thelen, 1993, West European labor in transition: Sweden and Germany compared, World Politics, 46, 23, 10.2307/2950665 Werth, B., 1994. The Billion-Dollar Molecule. Touchstone, Simon & Schuster, New York. Westney, E., 2001. Japan. In: Rugman, A., Brewer, T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Whitley, R., 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Whitley, 2000, The institutional structuring of innovation strategies, Organization Studies, 21, 855, 10.1177/0170840600215002 Whitley, 2002, Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 497, 10.1093/icc/11.3.497 Wood, S., 2001. Business, government, and patterns of labor market policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Hall, P., Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 247–274.