Management of patients with high-risk and advanced prostate cancer in the Middle East: resource-stratified consensus recommendations
Tóm tắt
Prostate cancer care in the Middle East is highly variable and access to specialist multidisciplinary management is limited. Academic tertiary referral centers offer cutting-edge diagnosis and treatment; however, in many parts of the region, patients are managed by non-specialists with limited resources. Due to many factors including lack of awareness and lack of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a high percentage of men present with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis. The aim of these recommendations is to assist clinicians in managing patients with different levels of access to diagnostic and treatment modalities. The first Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) satellite meeting for the Middle East was held in Beirut, Lebanon, November 2017. During this meeting a consortium of urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologist and imaging specialists practicing in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia voted on a selection of consensus questions. An additional workshop to formulate resource-stratified consensus recommendations was held in March 2019. Variations in practice based on available resources have been proposed to form resource-stratified recommendations for imaging at diagnosis, initial management of localized prostate cancer requiring therapy, treatment of castration-sensitive/naïve advanced prostate cancer and treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. This is the first regional consensus on prostate cancer management from the Middle East. The following recommendations will be useful to urologists and oncologists practicing in all areas with limited access to specialist multi-disciplinary teams, diagnostic modalities and treatment resources.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Gillessen S et al (2018) Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: the report of the advanced prostate cancer consensus conference APCCC 2017. Eur Urol 73(2):178–211
Diamond IR et al (2014) Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 67(4):401–409
Al-Sukhun S et al (2018) ASCO resource-stratified guidelines: methods and opportunities. J Glob Oncol 4:1–8
Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424
Bazarbashi S et al (2014) Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: current strategies of management in the Middle East. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 90(1):36–48
Herget KA et al (2016) Recent decline in prostate cancer incidence in the United States, by age, stage, and Gleason score. Cancer Med 5(1):136–141
Mukherji D et al (2017) Prostate cancer stage at diagnosis: first data from a Middle-Eastern cohort. J Clin Oncol 35(6 suppl):e552–e552
Kasivisvanathan V et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378(19):1767–1777
El-Shater Bosaily A et al (2015) PROMIS–prostate MR imaging study: a paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials 42:26–40
Parker CC et al (2018) Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 392(10162):2353–2366
James ND et al (2017) Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med 377(4):338–351
James ND et al (2016) Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10024):1163–1177
Sweeney CJ et al (2015) Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 373(8):737–746
Fizazi K et al (2017) Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377(4):352–360
Gandaglia G et al (2014) Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Prostate 74(2):210–216
Viers BR et al (2014) Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 66(6):1116–1124
Carrie C et al (2016) Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(6):747–756
Bianchi L et al (2016) The role of prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy for the prediction of clinical progression and cancer-specific mortality in node-positive prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol 69(6):1142–1148
Stephenson AJ et al (2007) Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 25(15):2035–2041
Fossati N et al (2017) Impact of early salvage radiation therapy in patients with persistently elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol
Abugharib A et al (2017) Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol 197(3 Pt 1):662–668
Perera M et al (2019) Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol
Shipley WU et al (2017) Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 376(5):417–428
Rosenthal SA et al (2019) Effect of chemotherapy with docetaxel with androgen suppression and radiotherapy for localized high-risk prostate cancer: the randomized phase III NRG oncology RTOG 0521 trial. J Clin Oncol JCO1802158
Viani GA et al (2016) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces toxicity with similar biochemical control compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer 122(13):2004–2011
Morgan SC et al (2018) Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 8(6):354–360
Nabid A et al (2018) Duration of androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized phase III trial. Eur Urol 74(4):432–441
Geara FB et al (2017) Nadir PSA is a strong predictor of treatment outcome in intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer patients treated by definitive external beam radiotherapy and androgen deprivation. Radiat Oncol 12(1):149
Smith MR, Yu MK, Small EJ (2018) Apalutamide and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378(26):2542
Hussain M et al (2018) Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378(26):2465–2474
Fizazi K et al (2019) Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 380(13):1235–1246
Sydes MR et al (2018) Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol. Ann Oncol 29(5):1235–1248
Aguiar PN, Jr et al (2019) Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone, docetaxel or placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 17(2):eGS4414
Kyriakopoulos CE et al (2018) Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED trial. J Clin Oncol 36(11):1080–1087
Szmulewitz RZ et al (2018) Prospective international randomized phase II study of low-dose abiraterone with food versus standard dose abiraterone in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(14):1389–1395
Aggarwal R et al (2018) Clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-emergent small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a multi-institutional prospective study. J Clin Oncol 36(24):2492–2503
Chakhtoura M et al (2017) The FRAX-based Lebanese osteoporosis treatment guidelines: rationale for a hybrid model. Osteoporos Int 28(1):127–137
Fizazi K et al (2011) Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 377(9768):813–822
Saad F (2002) Zoledronic acid significantly reduces pathologic fractures in patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Clin Prostate Cancer 1(3):145–152
Saad F et al (2004) Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(11):879–882
Himelstein AL et al (2017) Effect of longer-interval vs standard dosing of zoledronic acid on skeletal events in patients with bone metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317(1):48–58