Management of breech and twin labor during registrarship: A two-year prospective, observational study

Hannah, 2000, Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicenter trial, Lancet, 356, 1375, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2014, Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 123, 693, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d Vayssière, 2011, Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 156, 12, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045 Cohen, 2017, Obstetric practice guidelines: labor's love lost?, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Bellamy, 2016, Bilan démographique 2015, Insee Première, 1581, 1 Euro-Peristat project, SCPE and Eurocat, 2013 Lembrouck, 2016, Peut-on diminuer le taux de césarienne dans un CHU de niveau III?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 45, 641, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.08.002 Deneux-Tharaux, 2012, Utérus cicatriciel: aspects épidémiologiques, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 41, 697, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022 Zelli, 2016, Indications des premières césariennes dans un centre hospitalo-universitaire régional et stratégies raisonnables pour les diminuer, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 45, 841, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.06.001 Broche, 2008, Présentation du siège à terme: facteurs prédictifs de césarienne en cours de travail, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 37, 483, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.03.011 Hofmeyr, 2015, Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, 1 Berhan, 2016, The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 123, 49, 10.1111/1471-0528.13524 Goffinet, 2006, Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, 1002, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817 D’Ercole, 2011, 195 Gratius, 2010, Accouchement du siège par voie basse: l’expérience des internes en gynécologie obstétrique français, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 39, 144, 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.10.007 Blazek, 2005, Obstetrics–gynecology resident satisfaction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, 1798, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.002 Lee, 2011, Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995–2008, Obstet Gynecol, 118, 1095, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182318651 Barrett, 2013, A randomized trial of planned cesarean section or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy, N Engl J Med, 369, 1295, 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939 Asztalos, 2016, Twin birth study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, 371.e1-9 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2014, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet and higher-order multi-fetal pregnancies, Obstet Gynecol, 123, 1118, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446856.51061.3e Caughey, 2014, Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 210, 179, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026 Gupta, 2015, The changing scenario of obstetrics and gynecology residency training, J Grad Med Educ, 7, 401, 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00730.1 Schmitz, 2008, Neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 111, 695, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435 Easter, 2017, Twin vaginal delivery: innovate or abdicate, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 216, 484, 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.041 Edris, 2006, Relationship between intertwin delivery interval and metabolic acidosis in the second twin, Am J Perinatol, 23, 481, 10.1055/s-2006-954957