Management of Var sources for the reactive power planning problem by oppositional Harris Hawk optimizer
Tóm tắt
Reactive power management has grown more crucial for increased synchronization in modern power systems, since transmission loss minimization is a basic condition for secure power system operation. This paper proposes the Oppositional-based Harris Hawk Optimizer technique as an advanced meta-heuristic nature inspired methodology, which is applied on the conventional Ward Hale 6 bus system and the IEEE 30 bus system. The solution space is further altered by combining HHO with the Oppositional Based Learning technique in order to enhance approximation for the current solution. The suggested OHHO outperforms HHO as well as other optimization methodologies recently published articles, according to simulation results obtained on typical test systems.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Shaheen AM, El-Sehiemy RA, Farrag SM (2019) A reactive power planning procedure considering iterative identification of VAR candidate buses. Neural Comput Appl 31:653–674
Sereeter B, Vuik C, Witteveen C (2019) On a comparison of Newton-Raphson solvers for power flow problems. J Comput Appl Math 360:157–169
Sulaiman MH, Mustaffa Z, Saari MM, Daniyal H (2020) Barnacles Mating Optimizer: a new bio-inspired algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103330
Kotb MF, El-Fergany AA (2020) Optimal power flow solution using moth swarm optimizer considering generating units prohibited zones and valve ripples. J Elect Eng Technol. 15:179–192
Yuan G, Yang W (2019) Study on optimization of economic dispatching of electric power system based on Hybrid Intelligent Algorithms (PSO and AFSA). Energy 183:926–935
Chiang HD, Wang JC, Cockings O, Shin HD (1990) Optimal capacitor placements in distribution systems. I. A new formulation and the overall problem. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2:634–642
Chiang HD, Wang JC, Cockings O, Shin HD (1990) Optimal capacitor placements in distribution systems: part 2: solution algorithms and numerical results. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 5(2):643–649
Patel N, Bhattacharjee K (2020) A comparative study of economic load dispatch using sine cosine algorithm. Sci Iranica Trans D Comput Sci Eng Elect 3:1467–1480
Grudinin N (1998) Reactive power optimization using successive quadratic programming method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(4):1219–1225
Lee W-T, Horng S-C, Lin C-F (2019) Application of ordinal optimization to reactive volt-ampere sources planning problems. Energies 12(14):2746
Liu Z, Fang Y, Liu L, Ma S (2023) A multi-leader Harris Hawks optimizer with adaptive mutation and its application for modeling of silicon content in liquid iron of blast furnace. Math Comput Simul 213:466–514
Deng Z, Rotaru MD, Sykulski JK (2019) Kriging assisted surrogate evolutionary computation to solve optimal power flow problems. IEEE Trans Power Systms. 35(2):831–839
Shiva CK, Vedik B, Raj S, Mahapatra S, Mukherjee V (2023) A novel chaotic chimp sine cosine algorithm part-II: automatic generation control of complex power system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 173:113673
Fahmy H, El-Gendy EM, Mohamed MA, Saafan MM (2023) ECH3OA: an enhanced chimp-harris hawks optimization algorithm for copyright protection in Color images using watermarking techniques. Knowl Based Syst 269:110494
Gezici H, Livatyali H (2022) An improved Harris Hawks optimization algorithm for continuous and discrete optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 113:104952
Duman S, Sönmez Y, Güvenç U, Yörükeren N (2012) Optimal reactive power dispatch using a gravitational search algorithm IET Generation. Trans Distrib 6(6):563–576
Rajan A, Malakar T (2015) Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder-Mead simplex based firefly algorithm. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 66:9–24
Bhattacharya A, Chattopadhyay PK (2010) Solution of optimal reactive power flow using biogeography-based optimization. Int J Elect Electron Eng 4(8):568–576
Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL (1984) Optimal real and reactive power dispatch. Electr Power Syst Res 7(3):201–212
Shaw B, Mukherjee V, Ghoshal SP (2014) Solution of reactive power dispatch of power systems by an opposition-based gravitational search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:29–40
Mahadevan K, Kannan PS (2010) Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for reactive power dispatch. Appl Soft Comput 10(2):641–652
Abou El Ela AA, Abido MA, Spea SR (2011) Differential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch. Elect Power Syst Res. 81(2):458–464
Mukherjee A, Mukherjee V (2015) Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch by chaotic krill herd algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(15):2351–2362
Shaheen MAM, Ullah Z, Hasanien HM, Tostado-Véliz M, Ji H, Qais MH, Alghuwainem S, Jurado F (2023) Enhanced transient search optimization algorithm-based optimal reactive power dispatch including electric vehicles. Energy 277:127711
Pop CB, Cioara T, Anghel I, Antal M, Chifu VR, Antal C, Salomie I (2022) Review of bio-inspired optimization applications in renewable-powered smart grids: Emerging population-based metaheuristics. Energy Rep 8:11769–11798
Adetunji KE, Hofsajer IW, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Cheng L (2022) An optimization planning framework for allocating multiple distributed energy resources and electric vehicle charging stations in distribution networks. Appl Energy 322:119513
Mahapatra S, Raj S (2023) A novel meta-heuristic approach for optimal RPP using series compensated FACTS controller. Intell Syst Appl 18:200220
Raj S, Mahapatra S, Babu R, Verma S (2023) Hybrid intelligence strategy for techno-economic reactive power dispatch approach to ensure system security. Chaos Solitons Fractals 170:113363
Wang C, Cheng HZ and Yao LZ (2008) Reactive power optimization by plant growth simulation algorithm. In: 2008 Third international conference on electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies, pp 771–774. IEEE
Tizhoosh Hamid R (2005) Opposition-based learning: a new scheme for machine intelligence. In international conference on computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation and international conference on intelligent agents, Web Technologies and internet commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06), vol, pp 695–701. IEEE
Mahapatra S, Raj S, and Mohan Krishna S (2020) Optimal TCSC location for reactive power optimization using oppositional Salp swarm algorithm." In innovation in electrical power engineering, Communication, and Computing Technology, pp 413–424. Springer, Singapore
Raj S, Shiva CK, Vedik B, Mahapatra S, Mukherjee V (2023) A novel chaotic chimp sine cosine algorithm Part-I: For solving optimization problem. Chaos Solitons Fractals 173:113672
Momani S, Arqub OA, Maayah B (2020) Piecewise optimal fractional reproducing kernel solution and convergence analysis for the Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo model of the Lienard’s equation. Fractals 28(08):2040007
Momani S, Maayah B, Arqub OA (2020) The reproducing kernel algorithm for numerical solution of Van der Pol damping model in view of the Atangana-Baleanu fractional approach. Fractals 28(08):2040010
Abu-Arqub O, El-Ajou A, Momani S, Shawagfeh N (2013) Analytical solutions of fuzzy initial value problems by HAM. Appl Math Inform Sci 7(5):1903
Gudadappanavar SS and Mahapatra S (2021) Metaheuristic nature-based algorithm for optimal reactive power planning. Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manag, pp 1–14
Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872