Management of Ingested Foreign Bodies in Children

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition - Tập 60 Số 4 - Trang 562-574 - 2015
Robert Krämer1, Diana G. Lerner2, Tom K. Lin3, Michael A. Manfredi4, Manoj Shah5, Thomas C. Stephen6, Troy E. Gibbons7, Harpreet Pall8, Ben Sahn9, Mark McOmber3, George M. Zacur4, Joel A. Friedlander1, Antonio Quiros10, Douglas S. Fishman6, Petar Mamula11
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora
2Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
3Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
4Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
5Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
6Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
7Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
8Department of Pediatrics St Christopher's Hospital for Children Philadelphia PA
9Department of Pediatrics North Shore‐Long Island Jewish Medical Center Great Neck NY
10Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
11Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTForeign body ingestions in children are some of the most challenging clinical scenarios facing pediatric gastroenterologists. Determining the indications and timing for intervention requires assessment of patient size, type of object ingested, location, clinical symptoms, time since ingestion, and myriad other factors. Often the easiest and least anxiety‐producing decision is the one to proceed to endoscopic removal, instead of observation alone. Because of variability in pediatric patient size, there are less firm guidelines available to determine which type of object will safely pass, as opposed to the clearer guidelines in the adult population. In addition, the imprecise nature of the histories often leaves the clinician to question the timing and nature of the ingestion. Furthermore, changes in the types of ingestions encountered, specifically button batteries and high‐powered magnet ingestions, create an even greater potential for severe morbidity and mortality among children. As a result, clinical guidelines regarding management of these ingestions in children remain varied and sporadic, with little in the way of prospective data to guide their development. An expert panel of pediatric endoscopists was convened and produced the present article that outlines practical clinical approaches to the pediatric patient with a variety of foreign body ingestions. This guideline is intended as an educational tool that may help inform pediatric endoscopists in managing foreign body ingestions in children. Medical decision making, however, remains a complex process requiring integration of clinical data beyond the scope of these guidelines. These guidelines should therefore not be considered to be a rule or to be establishing a legal standard of care. Caregivers may well choose a course of action outside of those represented in these guidelines because of specific patient circumstances. Furthermore, additional clinical studies may be necessary to clarify aspects based on expert opinion instead of published data. Thus, these guidelines may be revised as needed to account for new data, changes in clinical practice, or availability of new technology.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1053/ajem.2001.25272

10.1007/s004310100788

10.3928/0090-4481-20011201-08

10.1542/peds.89.4.747

10.1542/peds.2009-3038

10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181f98916

Ferrante J, 2012, Injuries from batteries among children aged < 13 years‐‐United States, 1995‐2010, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 61, 661

10.1542/peds.2009-3037

Tanaka J, 1998, Esophageal electrochemical burns due to button type lithium batteries in dogs, Vet Hum Toxicol, 40, 193

10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05984.x

10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.06.002

10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.010

10.1007/BF00311314

10.1136/emj.19.1.71

10.1007/s11894-005-0037-6

CPSC starts rulemaking to develop new federal standard for hazardous high‐powered magnet sets. 2012 [release number: 12‐256].http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Newsroom/News‐Releases/2012/CPSC‐Starts‐Rulemaking‐to‐Develop‐New‐Federal‐Standard‐for‐Hazardous‐High‐Powered‐Magnet‐Sets/.

RaabeS. Man's steely resolve.The Denver Post.2013; Business section.

Child's death prompts replacement program of magnetic building sets.2006.http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06127.html.

10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182952ee5

10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182687be0

10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.08.019

10.1542/peds.91.1.121

10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02862.x

10.1007/s10620-010-1396-x

10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90106-9

10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.10.021

Aydoğdu S, 2009, Foreign body ingestion in Turkish children, Turk J Pediatr, 51, 127

10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V36N3p206

10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70274-1

10.1016/S0002-9610(41)90652-9

10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.072

10.1097/00000658-198402000-00010

10.1007/s00464-003-4266-1

10.1097/00000658-192704000-00010

10.1136/adc.84.2.165

10.1002/j.1536-4801.2002.tb07573.x

Mehran A, 2005, Gastric perforation secondary to ingestion of a sharp foreign body, JSLS, 9, 91

10.1007/s00268-005-0490-2

10.1097/00006565-198812000-00004

10.1159/000016880

10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1084

Garcia‐Segui A, 2012, Late migration of a toothpick into the bladder: initial presentation with urosepsis and hydronephrosis, Arch Esp Urol, 65, 626

Karadayi S, 2009, Wandering pins: case report, Cumhuriyet Med J, 31, 300

Mirza B, 2011, Open safety pin ingestion presenting as incarcerated umbilical hernia, APSP J Case Rep, 2, 25

10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N1p49

10.1016/0022-3468(91)91043-X

10.1080/110241500750009140

Hameed K, 2011, Management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract with flexible endoscope, J Postgrad Med Inst (Peshawar‐Pakistan), 25, 433

10.1007/s00383-006-1819-0

10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761155

10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80573-9

Uyemura MC, 2005, Foreign body ingestion in children, Am Fam Physician, 72, 287

10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70179-2

10.1016/j.dld.2012.11.002

10.1007/s10620-009-0900-7

10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.014

10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.023

10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01401.x

10.1067/mge.2001.112709

10.1007/s10620-006-9499-0

10.1002/j.1536-4801.2003.tb12045.x

10.1097/01.pec.0000101581.65509.17

10.1053/jpsu.2001.26381

10.1007/s10620-011-1911-8

10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181e67072

10.1055/s-2003-39674

10.1016/j.tgie.2005.12.006

10.2146/ajhp100587

10.1007/s00455-012-9434-9

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.001

10.1097/01.mcg.0000225622.09718.5f

10.1067/mge.2001.111039

10.1007/BF01318178

10.1258/0022215011908306

10.1177/000348945906800321

10.1001/archinte.1981.00340130107024

10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.07.010

10.1542/peds.2004-2555

10.1089/lap.2008.0206

10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170130038008

10.1007/s002689900152

10.1111/j.1742-1241.1991.tb08835.x

10.1002/j.1536-4801.1986.tb09184.x

10.1053/tgie.2002.37446

10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01291.x

10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016224

10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.04.005

10.1542/peds.2011-3685

Mirza B, 2012, Mortality in a case of crystal gel ball ingestion: an alert for parents, APSP J Case Rep, 3, 6