Mammographic Image Denoising and Enhancement Using the Anscombe Transformation, Adaptive Wiener Filtering, and the Modulation Transfer Function
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
IARC. World cancer report: International agency for research on cancer. Lyon, 2008
Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D’Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF: International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(18):1384–1393, 2003
Chlebowski RT: Breast cancer risk reduction: strategies for women at increased risk. Annu Rev Med 53:519–540, 2002
Giger ML, Chan H-P, Boone J: Anniversary paper: history and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys 35(12):5799–5820, 2008
Boyer B, Balleyguier C, Granat O, Pharaboz C: CAD in questions/answers review of the literature. Eur J Radiol 69(1):24–33, 2009
Freer TW, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220(3):781–786, 2001
Dean JC, Ilvento CC: Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol 187(1):20–28, 2006
Mahoney MC, Meganathan K: False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection. J Digit Imaging 24(5):772–777, 2011
Kopans DB: Breast imaging, 3rd edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2006
Yoon HJ, Zheng B, Sahiner B, Chakraborty DP: Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. Med Phys 34(6):2024–2038, 2007
Acha B, Serrano C, Rangayyan RM, Leo Desautels JE: Detection of microcalcifications in mammograms using error of prediction and statistical measures. J Electronic Imaging 18(1):013011, 2009
Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment ADA, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP: Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226(1):153–160, 2003
Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA: Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219(1):192–202, 2001
Ho WT, Lam PWT: Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 58(2):133–136, 2003
Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD: Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21(7):1203–1211, 1994
Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE, Yin FF, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA: Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 21(2):265–269, 1994
Schiabel H, Nunes FL, Escarpinati MC, Benatti RH: Investigations on the effect of different characteristics of images sets on the performance of a processing scheme for microcalcifications detection in digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging 14(Suppl 1):224–225, 2001
Garcia-Orellana CJ, Gallardo-Caballero R, Gonzalez-Velasco HM, Garcia-Manso A, Macias-Macias M: Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:4776–4779, 2008
Tourassi GD, Ike R, Singh S, Harrawood B: Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography. Acad Radiol 15(5):626–634, 2008
Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Benatti RH: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images using the modulation transfer function. Med Phys 29(12):2925–2936, 2002
Mencattini A, Salmeri M, Lojacono R, Frigerio M, Caselli F: Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(7):1422–1430, 2008
Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Costaridou L: Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques. Comput Biol Med 38(10):1045–1055, 2008
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital image processing, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2008
Yaffe MJ: Digital mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL Eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Vol 1. Physics and psychophysics. SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2000, pp 329–372
Saunders RS, Baker JA, Delong DM, Johnson JP, Samei E: Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance. Med Phys 34(10):3971–3981, 2007
Anscombe FJ: The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35:246–254, 1948
Mascarenhas NDA, Santos CAN, Cruvinel PE: Transmission tomography under poisson noise using the anscombe transformation and wiener filtering of the projections. Nucl Instrum Meth A 423:265–271, 1999
Jin F, Fieguth P, Winger L, Jernigan E: Adaptive Wiener filtering of noisy images and image sequences. In: 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, Proceedings of IEEE Vol 3, New York (USA), 2003, pp 349-352
Metz CE, Doi K: Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol 24(6):1079–1106, 1979
Rabbani M: Bayesian filtering of poisson noise using local statistics. IEEE T Acoust Speech 36(6):933–937, 1998
Doi K: Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to the X-ray tube focal spot. Med Phys 4(1):15–20, 1977
Rossmann K: Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Radiology 93(2):257–272, 1969
NEMA: Measurement of dimensions and properties of focal spots of diagnostic X-ray tubes, NEMA Standards XR 5, 1992
Nickoloff EL, Donnelly E, Eve L, Atherton JV, Asch T: Mammographic resolution: influence of focal spot intensity distribution and geometry. Med Phys 17(3):436–447, 1990
Rong XJ, Krugh KT, Shepard SJ, Geiser WR: Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Med Phys 30(7):1768–1775, 2003
Tang S, Barnes GT, Tanner RL: Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography. Med Phys 22(11):1803–1814, 1995
Goes CE, Schiabel H, Nunes FLS: Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):231–233, 2002
Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Goes CE: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection. J Digit Imaging 20(1):53–66, 2007
Wang Z, Bovik AC: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 26(1):98–117, 2009
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE T Image Process 13(4):600–612, 2004
Schiabel H, Vieira MAC, Ventura L: Preprocessing for improving CAD scheme performance for microcalcification detection based on mammography imaging quality parameters. In: Medical Imaging 2009: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 7260, Orlando (USA), pp 72602G1-G12, 2009
Matheus BR, Schiabel H: Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes. J Digit Imaging 24(3):500–506, 2011
CIRS - Computerized imaging reference systems, Inc. Model 011A manual. Norfolk, VA
Oliveira Jr PD, Vieira MAC, Schiabel H: Determination of focal spot size and the modulation transfer function of mammographic equipment without previous alignment. In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Munich (Germany), pp 1186-1189, 2009
Vieira MAC, Oliveira Jr PD, Schiabel H: Computational method for automatic determination of radiographic equipment anode angle. In: Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 6913, San Diego (USA), pp 69133 M1-M8, 2008
Metz C: ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 1:2–12, 2008
Eng J. ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University [updated 2006 May 17]. Available from: http://www.jrocfit.org