Making complex interventions work in low resource settings: developing and applying a design focused implementation approach to deliver mental health through primary care in India
Tóm tắt
Globally, there is a large treatment gap for people with mental disorders, and this gap is especially extreme in Low and Middle Income Countries. This gap can be potentially bridged by integrating evidenced based mental health interventions into primary care, but there is little knowledge about how to do this well, especially in countries with weak health systems. Research into the best implementation approaches is a priority, but in order to do so, it is first necessary to adapt implementation science principles and tools for mental health services in low resource settings. The frameworks that have been used to implement evidence-based behavioral health and health care interventions in High Income Countries do not directly apply to contexts where resources and processes for service delivery and support do not exist. We propose an implementation approach for low resource settings, called design-focused implementation, emphasizing the design of delivery systems using systematic design methods as precursor to implementation in severely resource constrained environments. This approach draws from existing literature in design thinking, quality implementation, improvement science and evaluation and we describe its use in creating the processes, organizations and the enabling environment for integration of mental health service delivery into primary care in India. Design-focused implementation will be useful for guiding research and practice in closing the implementation gap for a wide variety of complex interventions in low resource settings.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chisholm D, et al. Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1241–52.
Patel V, et al. A renewed agenda for global mental health. Lancet. 2011;378(9801):1441–2.
Dua T, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: summary of WHO recommendations. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001122.
WHO. Intervention Guide—Version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Patel V, Thornicroft G. Packages of care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: PLoS Medicine Series. PLoS Med. 2009;6(10):e1000160.
WHO, WONCA. Integrating mental health in primary care: a global perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
Patel V, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from disease control priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2015;387:1672–85.
Patel V, Saxena S. Transforming lives, enhancing communities—innovations in global mental health. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(6):498–501.
Proctor EK, et al. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24–34.
Hanlon C, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated mental health care: a district level situation analysis from five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88437.
Grimshaw JM, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
Pincus H, England M. Improving the quality of psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: a report from the iom. JAMA. 2015;314(12):1227–8.
Lund C, et al. PRIME: a programme to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders in five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001359.
Shidhaye R, et al. Challenges for transformation: a situational analysis of mental health care services in Sehore District, Madhya Pradesh. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51(8):903–12.
Powell BJ, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69:123–57.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci IS. 2015;10:53.
Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):462–80.
Wandersman A, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):171–81.
Fixsen DL, et al. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature; 2005. http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/resources/implementation-research-synthesis-literature. Accessed 28 Dec 2015.
Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci IS. 2009;4:50.
Craig P, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
Chinman M, et al. The getting to outcomes demonstration and evaluation: an illustration of the prevention support system. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):206–24.
Balasubramanian BA, et al. Learning evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations. Implement Sci IS. 2015;10:31.
Blase K, Kiser L, Van Dyke M. The hexagon tool: exploring context. Chapel Hill: National Implementation Research Network, FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2013.
Patton MQ. Developmental evaluation. Eval Pract. 1994;15(3):311–9.
Ulrich K, Eppinger S, Design Product. Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
Brown T. Design thinking. Harvard business review. 2008;86(6):84–92.
Taylor MJ, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290–8.
Breuer E, et al. Planning and evaluating mental health services in low- and middle-income countries using theory of change. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;208:s55–62.
Shidhaye R, et al. Development and piloting of a plan for integrating mental health in primary care in Sehore district, Madhya Pradesh. India. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;208:s13–20.
Wandersman A, Chien VH, Katz J. Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):445–59.
Castro FG, Barrera M Jr, Martinez CR Jr. The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci. 2004;5(1):41–5.
MOHFW. XIIth Plan District Mental Health Programme. http://mhpolicy.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/final-dmhp-design-xii-plan2.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2016.
Varkey P, Reller MK, Resar RK. Basics of quality improvement in health care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(6):735–9.
Benneyan J, Lloyd R, Plsek P. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(6):458–64.
De Silva MJ, et al. Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: the PRIME consortium methodology. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;208:s63–70.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729.
McKibbon KA, et al. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement Sci. 2010;5:16.