Machine learning for distinguishing saudi children with and without autism via eye-tracking data
Tóm tắt
Despite the prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) globally, there’s a knowledge gap pertaining to autism in Arabic nations. Recognizing the need for validated biomarkers for ASD, our study leverages eye-tracking technology to understand gaze patterns associated with ASD, focusing on joint attention (JA) and atypical gaze patterns during face perception. While previous studies typically evaluate a single eye-tracking metric, our research combines multiple metrics to capture the multidimensional nature of autism, focusing on dwell times on eyes, left facial side, and joint attention. We recorded data from 104 participants (41 neurotypical, mean age: 8.21 ± 4.12 years; 63 with ASD, mean age 8 ± 3.89 years). The data collection consisted of a series of visual stimuli of cartoon faces of humans and animals, presented to the participants in a controlled environment. During each stimulus, the eye movements of the participants were recorded and analyzed, extracting metrics such as time to first fixation and dwell time. We then used these data to train a number of machine learning classification algorithms, to determine if these biomarkers can be used to diagnose ASD. We found no significant difference in eye-dwell time between autistic and control groups on human or animal eyes. However, autistic individuals focused less on the left side of both human and animal faces, indicating reduced left visual field (LVF) bias. They also showed slower response times and shorter dwell times on congruent objects during joint attention (JA) tasks, indicating diminished reflexive joint attention. No significant difference was found in time spent on incongruent objects during JA tasks. These results suggest potential eye-tracking biomarkers for autism. The best-performing algorithm was the random forest one, which achieved accuracy = 0.76 ± 0.08, precision = 0.78 ± 0.13, recall = 0.84 ± 0.07, and F1 = 0.80 ± 0.09. Although the autism group displayed notable differences in reflexive joint attention and left visual field bias, the dwell time on eyes was not significantly different. Nevertheless, the machine algorithm model trained on these data proved effective at diagnosing ASD, showing the potential of these biomarkers. Our study shows promising results and opens up potential for further exploration in this under-researched geographical context.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alshaban F, Aldosari M, Al-Shammari H, El-Hag S, Ghazal I, Tolefat M, Ali M, Kamal M, Abdel Aati N, Abeidah M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of autism spectrum disorder in Qatar: a national study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019;60(12):1254–68.
Grzadzinski R, Huerta M, Lord C. DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes. Mol Autism. 2013;4(1):1–6.
Deng X, Liu Q, Deng Y, Mahadevan S. An improved method to construct basic probability assignment based on the confusion matrix for classification problem. Inf Sci. 2016;340:250–61.
Åsberg J, Gillberg C, Falck-Ytter T, Miniscalco C. Face-viewing patterns in young children with autism spectrum disorders: speaking up for the role of language comprehension. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(6):2246–52.
Falck-Ytter T, Fernell E, Hedvall Åsberg J, Von Hofsten C, Gillberg C. Gaze performance in children with autism spectrum disorder when observing communicative actions. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(10):2236–45.
Dris AB, Alsalman A, Al-Wabil A, Aldosari M. Intelligent gaze-based screening system for autism. In: 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS). IEEE; 2019. p. 1–5.
Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP. Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):694.
Galazka MA, Åsberg J, Zürcher NR, Hippolyte L, Lemonnier E, Billstedt E, Gillberg C, Hadjikhani N. Pupillary contagion in autism. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(2):309–15.
Guillon Q, Hadjikhani N, Baduel S, Kruck J, Arnaud M, Rogé B. Both dog and human faces are explored abnormally by young children with autism spectrum disorders. NeuroReport. 2014;25(15):1237–41.
Yovel G, Tambini A, Brandman T. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(13):3061–8.
Dundas EM, Best CA, Minshew NJ, Strauss MS. A lack of left visual field bias when individuals with autism process faces. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(6):1104–11.
Masulli P, Galazka M, Eberhard D, Åsberg J, Gillberg C, Billstedt E, Hadjikhani N, Andersen TS. Data-driven analysis of gaze patterns in face perception: methodological and clinical contributions. Cortex. 2022;147:9–23.
Tomasello M. Joint attention as social cognition. Joint attention: its origins and role in development. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 1995. 103–30.
Charman T. Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism? Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Ser B: Biol Sci. 2003;358(1430):315–24.
Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH, Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The autism diagnostic observation schedule—generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205–23.
Bacon EC, Moore A, Lee Q, Carter Barnes C, Courchesne E, Pierce K. Identifying prognostic markers in autism spectrum disorder using eye tracking. Autism. 2020;24(3):658–69.
Billeci L, Narzisi A, Campatelli G, Crifaci G, Calderoni S, Gagliano A, et al. Disentangling the initiation from the response in joint attention: an eye-tracking study in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Translational Psychiatry. 2016;6(5):808.
Ma X, Gu H, Zhao J. Atypical gaze patterns to facial feature areas in autism spectrum disorders reveal age and culture effects: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies. Autism Res. 2021;14(12):2625–39.
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;(8):1735–80.
Murias M, et al. Validation of eye-tracking measures of social attention as a potential biomarker for autism clinical trials: utilizing eye-tracking as a authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO. Downloaded on July 01,2022 at 09:55:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. Social communication biomarker for ASD. Autism Res. Jan. 2018;11(1):166–74.
Setien-Ramos I, Lugo-Marín J, Gisbert-Gustemps L, et al. Eye-Tracking Studies in adults with Autism Spectrum disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2023;53:2430–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05524-z.