Machine Vision Condition Monitoring of Heavy-Axle Load Railcar Structural Underframe Components

Bryan W. Schlake1, Sinisa Todorovic2, J. Riley Edwards1, John M. Hart3, Narendra Ahuja3, C P L Barkan1
1Railroad Engineering Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory, Urbana, Illinois, USA
2School of EECS, Oregon State University, Kelly Engineering Center, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Computer Vision and Robotics Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Urbana, Illinois, USA

Tóm tắt

To ensure the safe and efficient operation of the approximately 1.6 million freight cars (wagons) in the North American railroad network, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) requires periodic inspection of railcars to detect structural damage and defects. Railcar structural underframe components, including the centre sill, sidesills, and crossbearers, are subject to fatigue cracking due to periodic and/or cyclic loading during service and other forms of damage. The current railcar inspection process is time-consuming and relies heavily on the acuity, knowledge, skill, and endurance of qualified inspection personnel to detect these defects. Consequently, technologies are under development to automate critical inspection tasks to improve their efficiency and effectiveness. Research was conducted to determine the feasibility of inspecting railcar underframe components using machine vision technology. A digital video system was developed to record images of railcar underframes and computer software was developed to identify components and assess their condition. Tests of the image recording system were conducted at several railroad maintenance facilities. The images collected there were used to develop several types of machine vision algorithms to analyse images of railcar underframes and assess the condition of certain structural components. The results suggest that machine vision technology, in conjunction with other automated systems and preventive maintenance strategies, has the potential to provide comprehensive and objective information pertaining to railcar underframe component condition, thereby improving utilization of inspection and repair resources and increasing safety and network efficiency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Association of American Railroads (AAR)., 2008, Railroad facts

United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Safety., 2008, Code of Federal Regulations Title 49, Railroad Freight Car Safety Standards - Part 215

Lundgren J., Killian C. ‘Advanced rail vehicle inspections system’ In Proceedings of the Eighth International Heavy Haul Conference, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 14–16 June 2005, pp. 807–814 (IHHA Inc.).

Tournay H. M., Cummings S. ‘Monitoring the performance of railroad cars by means of wayside detectors in support of predictive maintenance’ In Proceedings of the Eighth International Heavy Haul Conference, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 14–16 June 2005, pp. 501–510 (IHHA Inc.).

Hawthorne K., 2005, Railw. Gaz., 161, 337

Robeda J., 2008, Int. Railw. J., 48, 47

10.1177/1475921705049764

Hart J. M., 2004, Machine vision system for monitoring railcar health: preliminary results

Freid B., Barkan C. P. L., Ahuja N., Hart J. M., Todorvic S., Kocher N. ‘Multispectral machine vision for improved undercarriage inspection of railroad rolling stock’ In Proceedings of the Ninth International Heavy Haul Conference Specialist Technical Session - High Tech in Heavy Haul, Kiruna, Sweden, 11–13 June 2007, pp. 737–744 (IHHA Inc.).

Ahuja N., 2007, ‘Machine vision for railroad equipment undercarriage inspection using multi-spectral imaging - HSR 49’

Hart J. M., Resendiz E., Freid B., Sawadisavi S., Barkan C. P. L., Ahuja N. ‘Machine vision using multi-spectral imaging for undercarriage inspection of railroad equipment’ In Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Railway research, Seoul, Korea, 2008.

Edwards J. R., Hart J. M., Todorovic S., Barkan C. P. L., Ahuja N., Chua Z., Kocher N., Zeman J. ‘Development of Machine Vision Technology for Railcar Safety Appliance Inspection’ In Proceedings of the Ninth International Heavy Haul Conference Specialist Technical Session - High Tech in Heavy Haul, Kiruna, Sweden, 2007, pp. 745–752.

10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00584.x

Anonymous, 2009, Railw. Age., 29

Kratville W. W., 1997, The car and locomotive cyclopedia of American practices, 6

Lagnebáck R., 2007, Evaluation of wayside condition monitoring technologies for condition-based maintenance of railway vehicles

Steets P. G., Tse Y. H. ‘Conrail's integrated automated wayside inspection’ In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference, IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, 1998, pp. 113–25.

Berry A., Gibert-Serra X., McNew D., Nejikovsky B., Tajaddini A. ‘High speed joint bar inspection using advanced image collection and processing techniques’ In Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, September 2007.

Berry A., Nejikovsky D., Tajaddini B., Gagne R. ‘Implementation and deployment of machine vision technology in rail inspection and maintenance’ In Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 2008.

10.1243/09544097JRRT92

United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Motive power and equipment compliance manual Ch. 4, pp. 22, available from http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1248 (accessed 25 July 2008).

United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Office of Safety. ‘Federal Railroad Administration Office of safety analysis’, Washington, District of Columbia, section 3.03, available from http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/officeofsafety/ (access date 14 December 2009).

Anand P., Barkan C. P. L., Schaeffer D. J., Werth C. J., Minsker B. S. ‘Environmental risk analysis of chemicals transported in railroad tank cars’ In Proceedings of the Eighth International Heavy Haul Conference, Rio De Janeiro, June 2005, pp. 395–403.

10.1109/34.546258

10.1109/83.568922

Arora H., 2006, Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recog., 4, 99

10.1080/00207720117646

10.1002/hfm.4530030404

Edwards J. R., 2006, Improving the efficiencyandeffectiveness of railcar safety appliance inspections using machine vision technology.

Martland C. D., 1992, ‘Background on railroad reliability’

Murray T., 2002, Trains, 30

Kwon O. K., 1995, Transport. Res. Rec., 1489, 1

Dirnberger J. R., 2006, Development and application of lean railroading to improve classification terminal performance

Logan P. ‘Role of yard or terminal in operating performance and capacity’ Presentation at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, District of Columbia, 2006.

10.3141/1995-07

Association of American Railroads (AAR)., 2010, Field manual of the AAR interchange rules