MULTI-PERSON SELECTION OF THE BEST WIND TURBINE BASED ON THE MULTI-CRITERIA INTEGRATED ADDITIVE-MULTIPLICATIVE UTILITY FUNCTION

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management - Tập 20 Số 4 - Trang 590-599 - 2014
Vygantas Bagočius1, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas2, Zenonas Turskis3
1Department of Construction Technology and Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania; Civil Engineering Department, Klaipėda University, Bijunu g. 17, 91225 Klaipėda
2Department of Construction Technology and Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
3Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Tóm tắt

Energy generation and savings is a vital problem for the social and economic development of a modern world. The construction of wind farms is a challenge of crucial importance to Lithuania. Offshore wind farms are one of the possibilities of the multiple use of marine space. Wind energy industry has become the fastest growing renewable energy in the world. An offshore wind farm is considered one of the most promising sources of green energy towards meeting the EU targets for 2020 and 2050. They provide long-term green energy production. The major purpose of this study is the selection and ranking of the feasible location areas of wind farms and assessing the types of wind turbines in the Baltic Sea offshore area. Multi-criteria decision making methods represent a robust and flexible tool investigating and assessing possible discrete alternatives evaluated applying the aggregated WSM and WPM method namely WASPAS. The following criteria such as the nominal power of the wind turbine, max power generated in the area, the amount of energy per year generated in the area, investments and CO2 emissions have been taken into consideration.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Benassai G., 2011, Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Physical Coastal Processes, Management and Engineering, 149, 3

Chakraborty S., 2014, Informatica, 25, 1, 10.15388/Informatica.2014.01

Collu M., 2012, Proc. of the 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 7, 637

10.3846/13923730.2013.812578

Four C Offshore, 2013, Jacket or lattice structures

10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.021

10.1260/0309524043028145

10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.011

10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.040

10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00197-6

10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.011

10.1260/0309524001495611

Kaya T., 2010, Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, 35, 2517

10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.012

10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.026

10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.013

10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.029

10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.024

10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.020

10.1260/0309524041211396

10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.026

10.1080/17445302.2012.718957

Offshore Wind Collaborative Organizing. 2005.A framework for offshore wind energy development in the United States, Washington. US Department of Energy. 34 p.

10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.001

Saaty, T. L. 1980.The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. Mcgraw-Hill. 287 p.

10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.065

10.1016/j.tej.2007.12.009

10.1016/j.acme.2012.11.003

10.3846/13923730.2013.851113

Van Bussel G., 2001, Proc. of the Marine Renewable Energies Conference, 113, 119

10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.010

Zavadskas E. K., 2013, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 47, 5

Zavadskas E. K., 2012, Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, 6, 3

10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.004

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Tập 20 Số 4

590-599

Thông tin tác giả