MUC4 expression is a novel prognostic factor in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas

Journal of Clinical Pathology - Tập 58 Số 8 - Trang 845-852 - 2005
Miyuki Saitou1, Masamichi Goto1, Michiko Horinouchi2, Shugo Tamada1, Kohji Nagata1, Taiji Hamada1, Masahiko Osako3, Sonshin Takao4, Surinder K. Batra5, Takashi Aikou6, K Imai7, Suguru Yonezawa8
1Department of Human Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan
2Department of Pathology, Kagoshima Medical Association Hospital, 890-0064, Japan
3Department of Surgery, Kagoshima Medical Association Hospital
4Research Centre for Life Science Resources, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan
5Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4525, USA
6Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Field of Oncology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences
7Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical College, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
8Field of Oncology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan

Tóm tắt

Background:Many patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas (IDC) have a poor outcome. MUC4 expression has been implicated as a marker for diagnosis and progression of IDC, but there are no studies of the relation between MUC4 expression and patient prognosis in IDC.Aims:To investigate the prognostic significance of MUC4 expression in IDC.Methods:The expression profiles of MUC4, ErbB2, p27, and MUC1 were investigated in IDC tissues from 135 patients by means of immunohistochemistry.Results:MUC4 was expressed in 43 of the 135 patients with IDC (31.9%). The survival of 21 patients with high MUC4 expression (>20% of neoplastic cells stained) was significantly worse than that of the 114 patients with low MUC4 expression (<20% of neoplastic cells stained) (p  =  0.0043). Univariate analysis showed that high MUC4 expression (p  =  0.0061), large primary tumour status (>T2) (p  =  0.0436), distant metastasis (p  =  0.0383), lymphatic invasion (p  =  0.0243), and surgical margins (p  =  0.0333) were significant risk factors affecting the outcome of patients with IDC. Backward stepwise multivariate analysis showed that MUC4 expression (p  =  0.0121), lymph node metastasis (p  =  0.0245), and lymphatic invasion (p  =  0.0239) were significant independent risk factors. ErbB2, p27, and MUC1 were not independent risk factors.Conclusions:This study shows that MUC4 expression in IDC is a new independent factor for poor prognosis and predicts the outcome of patients with IDC.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/00006676-200404000-00002

10.1097/00006676-200404000-00003

10.1097/00006676-200404000-00004

1997, Pathol Int, 47, 813, 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1997.tb03713.x

1996, Fertil Steril, 66, 316, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58460-X

10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00317-8

1999, Cancer Res, 59, 4083

10.1074/jbc.M008850200

2002, Eur J Biochem, 269, 2755, 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02949.x

10.1002/ijc.10250

10.1006/bbrc.2002.6475

10.2741/Moniaux

10.1007/s005340200037

10.1046/j.1440-1827.2002.01414.x

10.1002/path.1109

1998, Clin Cancer Res, 4, 2605

10.1002/hep.510300609

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990621)84:3<251::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-7

10.1267/ahc.36.443

10.1016/0006-291X(91)91580-6

10.1165/ajrcmb.20.2.3259

10.1177/41.10.8245407

10.1093/humrep/10.1.98

10.1095/biolreprod60.1.58

10.1002/ijc.2910570212

1994, Gastroenterology, 106, 1054, 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90767-6

10.1016/0016-5085(95)90406-9

2001, Clin Cancer Res, 7, 4033

10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003

10.1309/7Y7N-M1WM-R0YK-M2VA

10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80150-X

10.1002/hep.20031

10.1074/jbc.274.9.5263

10.1074/jbc.M303220200

10.1002/bies.10201

10.1038/sj.onc.1205970

10.1101/gad.8.1.9

2000, Anticancer Res, 20, 337

10.1002/cncr.10398

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991115)86:10<1966::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-M

10.1002/cncr.10492

1995, Cancer Res, 55, 1946

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2636

10.1002/ijc.11599

10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11<2247::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-5

2002, Ai Zheng, 21, 1075

10.1053/jhep.2001.24028

1999, Biochem J, 338, 325, 10.1042/bj3380325

1999, Cancer Res, 59, 2229

10.1074/jbc.272.52.33245

10.1186/1477-7827-2-4

10.1136/jcp.2003.013292

10.1002/ijc.1554

1998, Cancer Res, 58, 5577

10.1007/s00535-003-1224-6