MEASURING NON‐USE VALUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS USING THE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD: PROBLEMS OF INFORMATION AND COGNITION AND THE APPLICATION OF COGNITIVE QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN METHODS
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Advertising Research Foundation, 1985, Focus Groups: Issues and Approaches
Bogardus E. S., 1926, The Group Interview, Journal of Applied Sociology, 10, 372
Boyle K. J., 1992, The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent‐Valuation Studies
Brown G., 1994, Valuing Habitat and Endangered Species
Cambridge Economics, Inc, 1992, Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment
Carson R. T.andFlores N. E.(1992).A Second Look at ‘Dose Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences?: Experimental Evidence’. How Evident is the Evidence?Unpublished Paper Department of Economics University of California San Diego.
Carson R. Flores N. E.andHanemann W. M.(1992).On the Creation and Destruction of Public Goods‐The Matter of Sequencing. Draft (April).
Carson R. T.andMitchell R. C.(1992).Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Draft (18 November).
Chilton S. M.(1994).Design of the Detailed Information/Detailed Context Questionnaire‐The Focus Group Stage.Working Paper Department of Agricultural and Food Economics The Queen's University of Belfast Belfast.
Chilton S. M.andHutchinson W. G.(1994).The Economics and Psychology of Valuing Environmental Benefits. Paper presented at the (Northern Ireland Branch) British Psychological Society Annual Conference Donegal. April 1994.
Cummings R. G., 1986, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method
Desvousges W. H., 1989, Integrating Focus Groups and Surveys: Examples from Environmental Risk Studies, Journal of Official Statistics, 5, 349
Desvousges W. H., 1992, Research Triangle Monograph 92–1
Desvousges W. H., 1992, Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability
Desvousges W. H. Smith V. K. Brown D. H.andPate D. K.(1984).The Role of Focus Groups in Designing a Contingent Valuation Survey to Measure the Benefits of Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.RTI Project No. 2505–13Prepared for USEPA Washington DC Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park NC 27709–2194 (December).
Diamond P. A., 1992, Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence
Dunne M. E., 1993, Unpublished MSc Dissertation
Ericsson K. A., 1984, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
European Community CAMAR Project (19911994).The Socio Economic Impact of Afforestation on Rural Development. Contract No. 8001‐CT90–008.
Fischoff B., 1980, Cognitive Processes in Consumer and Decision Behaviour
Hanley N.andMunro A.(1993).The Effects of Information in Contingent Markets for Environmental Goods.Paper Presented at the EAERE Annual Conference Fontainebleau (June).
Hoehn J. P., 1989, Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test, American Economic Review, 79, 544
Holsti O. R., 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences
Hutchinson W. G.andChilton S. M.(1994).The Contribution of Cognitive Psychology to Estimating Non‐Use Value of Environmental Goods Using the Contingent Valuation Method.Paper Presented at the 5th Annual Conference of the EAERE Dublin 22–24 June 1994.
Imber D. Stevenson G.andWilks L.(1991).A Contingent Valuation Survey of the Kakadu Conservation Zone.Resource Assessment Research Paper No. 3 Australia.
Krippendorf K., 1980, Content Analysis ‐ An Introduction to its Methodology
Loomis J. B.andLarson D. M.(1992).Total Economic Values of Increasing Grey Whale Populations: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey of Visitors and Households.Division of Environmental Studies and Department of Agricultural Economics University of California‐Davis.
Loomis J. B. Lockwood M.andDeLacy T.(1992).Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection.Division of Environmental Studies University of California‐Davis.
McClelland G. H. Schulze W. D. Lazo J. K. Waldman D. M. Doyle J. K. Elliot S. R.andIrwin J. R.(1992).Methods for Measuring Non‐Use Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Groundwater Cleanup.Centre for Economic Analysis University of Colorado Boulder Colorado. Draft (September).
McCollum D. W., 1990, The Net Economic Value of Day Use Cross Country Skiing in Vermont: A Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Approach, Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 341, 10.1080/00222216.1990.11969839
Merton R. K., 1956, The Focus Interview
Mitchell R. C., 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Panel on Contingent Valuation [NOAA](1993).Federal Register/Friday 15 January 1993/Proposed Rules USA.
Randall A.(1992).Letter to Bengt KristominCountry Reports for the CVM NetworkLetter dated 25 September1992.
Rowe R., 1982, The Value of Visibility, Theory and Applications
Royston P. Bercini D. Sirken M.andMingay D.(1986).Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods.American Statistical Association pp.703–707.
Slovic P., 1982, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioural Science: Question Framing and Response Consistency
Smith V. K. Desvousges W. H.andFreeman A. M.III(1985).Valuing Changes in Hazardous Waste Risks: A Contingent Valuation Analysis. Draft Interim Report RTI Project No. 41U–2699. Prepared for USEPA Washington DC. Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park NC (February).
Walsh R. G., 1991, Appendix B Fish and Wildlife Service