Luteal phase support in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles
Tài liệu tham khảo
Yanushpolsky, 2015, Luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization, Semin Reprod Med, 33, 118, 10.1055/s-0035-1545363
Rosenberg, 1980, The luteal phase defect: the relative frequency of, and encouraging response to, treatment with vaginal progesterone, Fertil Steril, 34, 17, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44831-4
Jordan, 1994, Luteal phase defect: the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods in common clinical use, Fertil Steril, 62, 54, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56815-0
Devoto, 2009, Human corpus luteum physiology and the luteal-phase dysfunction associated with ovarian stimulation, Reprod Biomed Online, 18, 19, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60444-0
Thomsen, 2018, The impact of luteal serum progesterone levels on live birth rates-a prospective study of 602 IVF/ICSI cycles, Hum Reprod, 33, 1506, 10.1093/humrep/dey226
Van der Linden, 2015, Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7
Connell, 2015, Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review, Fertil Steril, 103, 939, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.125
Csapo, 1972, The significance of the human corpus luteum in pregnancy maintenance: I. Preliminary studies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 112, 1061, 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90181-0
Kohls, 2012, Early progesterone cessation after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized, controlled trial, Fertil Steril, 98, 858, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.046
Watters, 2019, Short versus extended progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh IVF cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Reprod Biomed Online, S1472-6483
Vaisbuch, 2012, Progesterone support in IVF: is evidence-based medicine translated to clinical practice? A worldwide web-based survey, Reprod Biomed Online, 25, 139, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.04.005
Cicinelli, 2004, First uterine pass effect is observed when estradiol is placed in the upper but not lower third of the vagina, Fertil Steril, 81, 1414, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.12.016
Cicinelli, 1999, Transvaginal progesterone: evidence for a new functional ‘“portal system”’ flowing from the vagina to the uterus, Hum Reprod Update, 5, 365, 10.1093/humupd/5.4.365
Bourgain, 1990, Effects of natural progesterone on the morphology of the endometrium in patients with primary ovarian failure, Hum Reprod, 5, 537, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137138
Child, 2018, Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles, Reprod Biomed Online, 36, 630, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.02.001
Yanushpolsky, 2010, Crinone vaginal gel is equally effective and better tolerated than intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized study, Fertil Steril, 94, 2596, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.033
Dal Prato, 2008, Vaginal gel versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase supplementation: a prospective randomized trial, Reprod Biomed Online, 16, 361, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60597-4
Zarutskie, 2009, A meta-analysis of the route of administrationof luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone, Fertil Steril, 92, 163, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.018
Lockwood, 2014, 13 European Centers. Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a noninferiority randomized controlled study, Fertil Steril, 101, 112, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.010
Baker, 2014, A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization, Hum Reprod, 29, 2212, 10.1093/humrep/deu194
Kuhl, 2005, Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration, Climacteric, 8, 3, 10.1080/13697130500148875
Ritzner, 2011, Selectivity and potency of the retroprogesterone dydrogesterone in vitro, Steroids, 76, 607, 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.043
Chakravarty, 2005, Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronised progesterone as luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: results of a randomised study, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 97, 416, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.08.012
Chakravarty, 2006, Oral dydrogesterone vs. Vaginal micronized progesterone as luteal support in art cycles: evaluation based on hormone profile and clinical outcome, Hum Reprod, 21, i83
Tournaye, 2017, A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization, Hum Reprod, 32, 1019, 10.1093/humrep/dex023
Griesinger, 2018, Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial, Hum Reprod, 33, 2212
Barbosa, 2018, Oral dydrogesterone vs. Vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support in women undergoing embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, JBRA Assist Reprod, 22, 148
Tomic, 2015, Oral dydrogesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel in the luteal phase support: randomized controlled trial, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 186, 49, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.002
Patki, 2007, Modulating fertility outcome in assisted reproductive technologies by the use of dydrogesterone, Gynecol Endocrinol, 23, 68, 10.1080/09513590701584857
Ganesh, 2011, Comparison of oral dydrogestrone with progesterone gel and micronized progesterone for luteal support in 1,373 women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical study, Fertil Steril, 95, 1961, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.148
Salehpour, 2013, Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with suppository vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a randomized clinical trial, Iran J Reprod Med, 11, 913
Saharkhiz, 2016, A comparative study of dydrogesterone and micronized progesterone for luteal phase support during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, Gynecol Endocrinol, 32, 213, 10.3109/09513590.2015.1110136
Rashidi, 2016, Oral dydrogesterone for luteal support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer artificial cycles: a pilot randomized controlled trial, Asian Pac J Reprod, 5, 490, 10.1016/j.apjr.2016.10.002
Versen-Höynck, 2019, Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a Corpus luteum, von Hypertension, 73, 640, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12043
Navot, 1991, The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro, Fertil Steril, 55, 114, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54069-2
Bjuresten, 2011, Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer, Fertil Steril, 95, 534, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019
Veleva, 2013, Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer, Hum Reprod, 28, 2425, 10.1093/humrep/det251
Montagut, 2016, Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues, Hum Reprod, 31, 2803, 10.1093/humrep/dew263
Lee, 2013, Luteal phase support does not improve the clinical pregnancy rate of natural cycle frozen- thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 169, 50, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.005
Casper, 2016, Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support, Fertil Steril, 105, 867, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.006
Groenewoud, 2013, What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 19, 458, 10.1093/humupd/dmt030
Seol, 2020, Effect of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone on pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles: a meta-analysis, Clin Exp Reprod Med
Fatemi, 2010, Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle, Fertil Steril, 94, 2054, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036
El Toukhy, 2004, Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study, Hum Reprod, 19, 874, 10.1093/humrep/deh183
Groenewoud, 2016, A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer, Hum Reprod, 31, 1483, 10.1093/humrep/dew120
Lin, 1995, Prediction of early pregnancy outcomes, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 51, 33, 10.1016/0020-7292(95)80005-W
Maheshwari, 2018, Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?, Hum Reprod Update, 24, 35, 10.1093/humupd/dmx031
Yovich, 2015, Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement, Reprod Biomed Online, 31, 180, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.005
Labarta, 2017, Low serum progesterone on the day of embryo transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in oocyte donation cycles after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study, Hum Reprod, 32, 2437, 10.1093/humrep/dex316
Cédrin-Durnerin, 2019, Serum progesterone concentration and live birth rate in frozen-thawed embryo transfers with hormonally prepared endometrium, Reprod Biomed Online, 38, 472, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.026
Gaggiotti-Marre, 2019, Low serum progesterone the day prior to frozen embryo transfer of euploid embryos is associated with significant reduction in live birth rates, Gynecol Endocrinol, 35, 439, 10.1080/09513590.2018.1534952
Volovsky, 2020, Do serum progesterone levels on day of embryo transfer influence pregnancy outcomes in artificial frozen-thaw cycles?, J Assist Reprod Genet
Williams, 2000, Vaginal progesterone therapy during programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of serum progesterone levels and pregnancy rates, Fertil Steril, 74, S209, 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01336-4
Shapiro, 2014, Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts, Hum Reprod, 29, 1706, 10.1093/humrep/deu121
Haddad, 2007, Intramuscular route of progesterone administration increases pregnancy rates during non-downregulated frozen embryo transfer cycles, J Assist Reprod Genet, 24, 467, 10.1007/s10815-007-9168-z
Kaser, 2012, Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer, Fertil Steril, 98, 1464, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.007
Feinberg, 2013, Endometrin as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction, Fertil Steril, 99, 174, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.019
Devine, 2018, Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial, Fertil Steril, 109, 266, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.004
Alsbjerg, 2013, Increasing vaginal progesterone gel supplementation after frozen-thawed embryo transfer significantly increases the delivery rate, Reprod Biomed Online, 26, 133, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.012
Rashidi, 2016, Mansoureh Gorginzadehet. Oral dydrogesterone for luteal support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer artificial cycles: A pilot randomized controlled trial, Asian Pac J Reprod, 5, 490, 10.1016/j.apjr.2016.10.002
Zarei, 2017, Comparison of four protocols for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed Embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 295, 239, 10.1007/s00404-016-4217-4
