Lung cancer screening by single-shot dual-energy subtraction using flat-panel detector
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of single-shot dual-energy subtraction (DES) method using a flat-panel detector for lung cancer screening The subjects were 13,315 residents (5801 males and 7514 females) aged 50 years or older (50–97 years, with an intermediate value of 68 years) who underwent lung cancer screening for a period of 1 year and 6 months from January 2019 to June 2020. We investigated whether the number of lung cancers detected, the detection rate, and the rate of required scrutiny changed, when DES images were added to the judgment based on conventional chest radiography. When DES images were added, the number and percentage of cancer detection increased from 16 (0.12%) to 23 (0.17%) (P < 0.05). Five of the newly detected 7 lung cancers were in the early stages of resectable cancer. The rate of participants requiring scrutiny increased slightly from 1.1 to 1.3%. DES method improved the detection of lung cancer in screening. The increase in the percentage of participants requiring scrutiny was negligible.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Churchet TR, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) randmized trial. JAMA. 2011;306(17):1865–73.
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.
Harry JK, Carlijn MA, Pim AJ, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:503–13.
Quekel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest. 1999;115(3):720–4.
Austin JH, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology. 1992;182(1):115–22.
Shah PK, Austin JH, White CS, Patel P, Haramati LB, Pearson GD. Missed non–small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. Radiology. 2003;226:235–41.
Li F, Engelmann R, Pesce LL, Doi K, Metz CE, MacMahon H. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging—comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiology. 2011;261:937–49.
Kido S, Nakamura H, Ito W, Shimura K, Kato H. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual energy computed radiography of the chest (part 1). Eur J Radiol. 2002;44(3):198–204.
Kido S, Kuriyama K, Kuroda C, Nakamura H, Ito W, Shimura K, et al. Detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest: effect of a computer-aided diagnosis system (part 2). Eur J Radiol. 2002;44(3):205–9.
Uemura M, Miyagawa M, Yasuhara Y, Murakami T, Ikura H, Sakamoto K, et al. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiat Med. 2005;23(6):391–7.
Niklason LT, Hickey NM, Chakraborty DP, Sabbagh EA, Yester MV, Fraser RG, Barnes GT. Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography. Radiology. 1986;160:589–93.
Manji F, Wang J, Norman G, Wang Z, Koff D. Comparison of dual energy subtraction chest radiography and traditional chest X-rays in the detection of pulmonary nodules. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016;6(1):1–5.
Farkas ZS, Schick A, Cullmann J, Ebner L, Megyeri B, Vock P, et al. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers’ performance in nodule detection. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:1006–13.
Edward F, Patz J, Paul P, Constantine G. Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):269–74.
Ide K, Mogami H, Murakami T, Yasuhara Y, Miyagawa M, Mochizuki H. Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiat Med. 2007;25(5):195–201.
Oda S, Awai K, Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Yanaga Y, Kawanaka K, et al. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study. Radiat Med. 2010;28:214–9.
Garmer M, Hennings SP, Jagar HJ, Schrick F, Loo T, Jacobs A, et al. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:75–80.
Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT 3rd, Chotas HG, Baydush AH, Vargas-Voacec R, et al. Imaging characteristics of amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. Radiology. 2001;218:683–8.