Lower English proficiency means poorer feedback performance? A mixed-methods study

Allaei, 1990, Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms, The Writing Instructor, 10, 19 Allen, 2015, Personal and procedural factors in peer feedback: A survey study, Komaba Journal of English Education, 6, 47 Allen, 2016, Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback, System, 56, 96, 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002 Allen, 2013, Peer feedback in the academic English classroom: A pilot study, Komaba Journal of English Education, 4, 27 Allen, 2016, The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback, Language Teaching Research, 20, 498, 10.1177/1362168814561902 Ashwell, 2000, Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8 Bitchener, 2009, The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback, ELT Journal, 63, 204, 10.1093/elt/ccn043 Carson, 1996, Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0 Caulk, 1994, Comparing teacher and student responses to written work, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181, 10.2307/3587209 Chang, 2012, Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course, Computers and Composition, 29, 63, 10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001 Chang, 2015, Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review, Assessing Writing, 25, 2, 10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001 Diab, 2010, Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts, System, 38, 85, 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008 Ellis, 2010, Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335, 10.1017/S0272263109990544 Glaser, 1992 Huisman, 2017, Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance, Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 1433, 10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854 Hyland, 2006, Feedback on second language students’ writing, Language Teaching, 39, 83, 10.1017/S0261444806003399 Kamimura, 2006, Effects of peer feedback on EFL student writers at different levels of English proficiency: A Japanese context, TESL Canada Journal, 23, 12, 10.18806/tesl.v23i2.53 Lantolf, 2012, Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research, 57 Larson-Hall, 2010 Lee, 2015, Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback, System, 55, 1, 10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003 Lee, 2017 Lockhart, 1995, Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content, Language Learning, 45, 605, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x Lundstrom, 2009, To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30, 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 Min, 2005, Training students to become successful peer reviewers, System, 33, 293, 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003 Min, 2006, The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 Nelson, 1993, Peer response groups: do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?, TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135, 10.2307/3586965 Oxford University, 2001 Patton, 2002 Powers, 1996, Effects of applying different time limits to a proposed GRE writing test, Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 433, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00500.x Raes, 2015, Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 40, 178, 10.1080/03075079.2013.823930 Rahimi, 2013, Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing, Language Teaching Research, 17, 67, 10.1177/1362168812459151 Stevenson, 2006, Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 201, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002 Tsui, 2000, Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9 Tsui, 2010, Cultural contexts and situated possibilities in the teaching of second language writing, Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 364, 10.1177/0022487110364855 Vygotsky, 1978 Yang, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 Yoon, 2016, Concordancers and dictionaries as problem-solving tools for ESL academic writing, Language Learning & Technology, 20, 209 Yu, 2017, Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?, Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 178, 10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806 Yu, 2017, Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study, Assessing Writing, 33, 25, 10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004 Yu, 2014, An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing, System, 47, 28, 10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007 Yu, 2015, Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective, Language Teaching Research, 19, 572, 10.1177/1362168814541714 Yu, 2016, Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014), Language Teaching, 49, 461, 10.1017/S0261444816000161 Yu, 2016, Understanding the role of learners with low English language proficiency in peer feedback of second language writing, TESOL Quarterly, 50, 483, 10.1002/tesq.301 Zhao, 2011, Using learners’ diaries to investigate the influence of students’ English language proficiency on peer assessment, Journal of Academic Writing, 1, 126, 10.18552/joaw.v1i1.20 Zhu, 2012, Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective, TESOL Quarterly, 46, 362, 10.1002/tesq.22