Lost in translation? The European Convention on Human Rights at the Court of Arbitration for Sport

The International Sports Law Journal - 2022
Antoine Duval1
1Asser Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is not known as a human rights court. Instead, its primary focus is on applying and interpreting the regulations of international (and sometimes national) sport governing bodies (SGBs). It is only recently that the intersection between the CAS jurisprudence and human rights has become of interest in the academic literature and public debates. In particular, the Mutu and Pechstein decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in October 2018 made clear that the CAS does not escape the indirect scrutiny of the Strasbourg court. Nevertheless, until today, very few publications have been dedicated to the interplay between the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the CAS. This paper aims to contribute to remedying this want by charting the CAS awards in which a reference to the ECHR or a decision of the ECtHR was made and tracing the impact and function of such references in the CAS jurisprudence. The findings highlight the various functions of the references to the ECHR in CAS awards, the discrepancies between some of the interpretations of the ECHR advanced by the CAS and the ECtHR’s own understanding of the Convention, and the limited success of appellants to challenge SGBs’ decisions on the basis of the ECHR. The paper concludes by arguing that the CAS would need to be institutionally reformed in order for human rights to act as an effective check on the transnational power of SGBs in CAS proceedings.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Besson S (2014) European Human Rights pluralism: notion and justification. In: Maduro M, Tuori K, Sankari S (eds) Transnational law rethinking European law and legal thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 170–205

Bützler B, Schöddert L (2020) Constitutionalizing FIFA: promises and challenges. Tilburg Law Rev 25(1):40–54

CAS (2021) Sport and Human Rights: overview from a CAS perspective. https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Human_Rights_in_sport__CAS_report_updated_31_03_2021_.pdf

Casini L (2011) The making of a Lex Sportiva by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Ger Law J 12(5):1317–1340

Costa J-P (2013) Legal opinion regarding the draft World Anti-Doping Code. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/legal/legal-opinion-on-the-draft-2015-world-anti-doping-code

Costa J-P (2019) Legal opinion on the 2021 code. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/the-code/legal-opinion-on-the-2021-code-by-judge-jean-paul-costa

Drzemczewski A (1979) The European Human Rights Convention and relations between Private Parties. Neth Int Law Rev 26(2):163–181

Duval A (2020a) Time to go public? The need for transparency at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. In: Duval A, Rigozzi A (eds) Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2017. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/15757_2019_29

Duval A (2020b) Not in My Name! Claudia Pechstein and the Post-Consensual Foundations of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. In: Ruiz Fabri H et al (ed) International Judicial Legitimacy: new voices and approaches. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 169–202

Duval A, Heerdt D (2020) FIFA and human rights—a research agenda. Tilburg Law Rev 25(1):1–11

ECtHR (2021) Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, pp 99–102

Frumer P (2016) L’arbirage sportif, la lutte contre le dopage et le respect des droits fondamentaux des sportifs professionnels: une incertitude peu glorieuse. Revue Trimestrielle Des Droits De L’homme 108:817–853

Geistlinger M, Gappmaier S (2013) Some thoughts on the role of the European Convention on Human Rights in the jurisprudence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Yearb Int Arbitr 3:307–314

Goldsworthy D (2018) Athletes’ rights under the World Anti-Doping Code: a legitimate public interest? Altern Law J 43(3):197–202

Grell T (2018) The International Olympic Committee and human rights reforms: game changer or mere window dressing? Int Sports Law J 17:160–169

Haas U (2012) Role and application of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights in CAS procedures. Int Sports Law Rev 3:43–60

Hard M (2010) Caught in the net: athletes’ rights and the World Anti-Doping Agency. South Calif Interdiscipl Law J 19:533–564

Heerdt D (2018) Tapping the potential of human rights provisions in mega-sporting events’ bidding and hosting agreements. Int Sports Law J 17:170–185

Hessert B (2021) The exchange of self-incriminating information of athletes between sports organisations and law enforcement. Int Sports Law J 21:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-021-00194-y

Houlihan B (2004) Civil rights, doping control and the World Anti-doping Code. Sport in Society 7(3):420–437

Kaufmann-Kohler G, Rigozzi A (2007) Conformity of Art. 10.6 with fundamental rights of athletes. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/world-anti-doping-program/conformity-with-fundamental-rights-of-athletes

Kaufmann-Kohler G et al (2003) Conformity of certain provisions of the draft WADC with commonly accepted principles of international law. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/legal/conformity-with-international-law

Keller H, Stone Sweet A (2008) Assessing the impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. In: Keller H, Stone Sweet A (eds) A Europe of Rights: the impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Krisch N (2008) The open architecture of European Human Rights Law. Mod Law Rev 71:183–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00688.x

Lane L (2018) The horizontal effect of international human rights law in practice. Eur J Comp Law Govern 5(1):5–88

Latty F (2007) La lex Sportiva: Recherche sur le droit transnational, Brill Leiden

Letnar Cernic J (2012) Fair trial guarantees before the court of arbitration for sport. Hum Rights Int Legal Discourse 6:259–283

Loven C (2020) “Verticalised” cases before the European Court of Human Rights unravelled: an analysis of their characteristics and the Court’s approach to them. Neth Quart Hum Rights 38(4):246–263

Lukomski J (2013) Arbitration clauses in Sport Governing Bodies’ statutes: consent or constraint? Analysis from the perspective of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Int Sports Law J 13:60–70

Maisonneuve M (2011) Arbitrage des litiges sportifs. LGDJ, Paris

Rigozzi A (2005) L’arbitrage international en matière de sport. Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basel

Rigozzi A (2020) Sports Arbitration and the European Convention of Human Rights—Pechstein and beyond. In: Muller C et al (ed) New developments in International Commercial Arbitration. Stampfli, Bern, pp 77–130

Schneider AJ (2004) Privacy, confidentiality and human rights in sport. Sport in Society 7:438–456

Soek J (2006) The strict liability principle and the human rights of the athlete in doping cases. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

Somek A (2020) Cosmopolitan constitutionalism: the case of the European Convention. Glob Cons 9(3):467–489

Stone Sweet A (2012) A cosmopolitan legal order: constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe. Glob Const 1(1):53–90

Stone Sweet A, Ryan C (2018) A cosmopolitan legal order: Kant, Constitutional Justice, and the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Tamburrini C (2013) WADA’s anti-doping policy and athletes’ right to privacy. Revista De Filosofía, Ética y Derecho Del Deporte 1:84–96

van der Sloot B et al (2020) Athletes’ human rights and the fight against doping: a study of the European Legal Framework. ASSER International Sports Law Series, T.W.C. Asser Press, The Hague

Zglinski J (2018) Doing too little or too much? Private law before the European Court of Human Rights. Yearb Eur Law 37:98–129

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

The International Sports Law Journal

Thông tin tác giả