Lose One Another ... and Find One Another in Nanospace. ‘Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders (NanoSoc)’
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson A (2007) Hope for nanotechnology: anticipatory knowledge and the governance of affect. Area 39(2):156–165
Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bensaude-Vincent B (2006) Two cultures of nanotechnology? In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 7–28
Berne RW, Schummer J (2005) Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25(6):459–468
Calvino I (1988) Six memos for the next millennium. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Claeys J, Debusscher M, Elchardus M, Smets L (2004) Biotechnologie in de publieke sfeer. Vakgroep Sociologie, Onderzoeksgroep TOR, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel
Crow M, Sarewitz D (2000, September) Nanotechnology and societal transformation. Paper presented at the National Science and Technology Council, Workshop on Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NSF
Deblonde M, Barriat V, Warrant F, Goorden L, Valenduc G (2005) Science and precaution in interactive risk evaluation: SPIRE. Belgian Science Policy, Brussels
De Vries MJ (2006) Analyzing the complexity of nanotechnology. In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 165–179
Dryzek JS, Niemeyer SJ (2003, August) Paper for the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Dupuy JP (2004) Complexity and uncertainty, a prudential approach to nanotechnology. A contribution to the work in progress of the ‘Foresighting the new technology wave’. High-Level Expert Group, European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php
European Communities, Special Eurobarometer (2005) Social values, science and technology, June, 2005
European Communities (2004) Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology, Communication from the Commission, research DG, retrieved from http://www.cordis.lu/nanotechnology
Fisher E, Mahajan RL (2006) Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Sci Public Policy 33(1):5–16
Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):485–496
Funtowicz S (2007) Van bewijsvoering door deskundigen tot participatieve Dialoog. In: viWTA Series ‘Wetenschap, Maatschappij, Politiek: wie stuurt wie? Flemish Parliament, Brussels, pp 11–26
Garreau J (2005) Radical evolution: the promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies—and what it means to be human. Doubleday, US
Glimell H (2004) Grand visions and lilliput politics: staging the exploration of the ‘endless frontier’. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 231–246
Goorden L (2004) “Innovation policy and technology assessment in Flanders”. Study Commissioned by the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment
Goorden L (2006) Met nieuwe participatieve praktijken naar een betere afstemming tussen het maatschappelijke en het politieke debat. Ethiek Maatsch 9(1):76–83
Goorden L, Van Oudheusden M, Evers J, Deblonde M (2008) Nanotechnologies for tomorrow’s society: a case for reflective action research in Flanders, Belgium. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore J (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society, vol 1. Presenting futures. Springer, Tempe, Arizona, pp 163–183
Grin J, Felix F, Bos B (2003, August) Practices for reflexive design: lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. Paper for the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia
Grunwald A (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 49–80
Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2006) Real time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24(1–2):93–109
Hanssen L, Walhout B, Van Est R (2008) Tien lessen voor een nanodialoog Stand van het debat rondom nanotechnologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Hosper GJ (2002) Clusterbeleid tussen trend en traditie. Tijdschr Wet Technol Samenlev 10(4):152–156
Hottois G (2003) Aan gene zijde van de biopolitiek? In: Stengers I, Hottois G (eds) Wetenschappelijke en Bio-ethische praktijken. Damon, Budel, pp 68–87
Hullmann A (2006) The economic development of nanotechnology: an indicators based analysis. European Comission, Brussels, November 28th 2006. [online] http://cordis.europa.eu./nanotechnology [11/01/2007]
Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36(2):299–320
Janich P (2006) Wissenschaftstheorie der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz AS (eds) Nanotechnologien im kontext. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 1–32
Jans E (2006) Let’s crash, not clash. In: Toneelg(e)ruis 1, pp 139–142
Jasanoff S (2006) Designs on nature, science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J, Cohen GL (2007) Affect, values, and nanotechnology risk perceptions: an experimental investigation, cultural cognition project working paper No.22. ([email protected])
Kearnes M, Wynne B (2007) On nanotechnology and ambivalence: the politics of enthusiasm. NanoEthics 1:131–142
Kunneman H (2005) Voorbij het dikke-ik. Uitgeverij SWP, Amsterdam
Latour B (2004) Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, London
Lopez J (2004) Bridging the gaps: science fiction in nanotechnology. Special issue on ‘Nanotech Challenges’. HYLE 10(2):129–152
Lösch A (2006a) Anticipating the future of nanotechnology: some thoughts on the boundaries of sociotechnological visions. Department of Sociology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt
Lösch A (2006b) Means of communicating innovations. A case study for the analysis and assessment of nanotechnology’s futuristic visions. Sti-studies 2:103–125
Mody CCM (2004) Small, but determined: technological determinism in nanoscience. HYLE 10(2):99–128
Nordmann A (2002) Converging technologies: shaping the future of European Societies. European Commission, Brussels, 64 pp. [online] http://www.ntnu.no/2020/pdf/final_report_en.pdf [11/01/2007]
Nordmann A (2003, December) Nanotechnology:Convergence and Integration. Paper presented at the EuroNanoForum, Trieste
Nordmann A (2004) Molecular disjunctions: staking claims at the nanoscale. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 51–62
Nordmann A (2006, Oktober) Design choices in the nanoworld: a space odyssey. Paper presented at the UCSIA Conference ‘Nano-researchers facing choices’, University of Antwerp
Pirsig RM (1974) Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Corgi Book, London, p 109
Renn O, Roco MC (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. White paper no.2, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva
Rip A (2005) Technology assessment as part of the co-evolution of nanotechnology and society: the thrust of the TA Program in NanoNed. Paper contributed to the Conference on “Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society”, Marburg.
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, United States
Schiemann G (2006) Kein Weg vorbei an der Natur: Natur als gegenpart und Voraussetzung der Nanotechnologie. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwartz A (eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Philosophische, Ethische und Gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Akademische Verlaggesellschaft, Berlin, pp 115–130
Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 54(2&3):251–268
Shrader-Frechette KS (2007) Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions for informed consent. Nanoethics 1:47–56
Sloterdijk P (2006) Het Kristalpaleis, Een filosofie van de globalisering. SUN, Amsterdam
STOA (Scientific Technology Options Assessment) (2006) Technology assessment on converging technologies, Report commissioned by the European Parliament
Swierstra J, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. Nanoethics 1:3–20
Toumey CP (2006) Narratives for nanotech: anticipating public reactions to nanotechnology. In: Schummer J, Baird D (eds) Nanotechnology challenges, implications for philosophy, ethics and society. World Scientific, London, pp 383–411
Van de Poel I (2000) On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 12(3):383–397
Van Oudheusden M, Evers J (2008, April) Assessing citizens’ moral argumentations on nanotechnologies: an incentive to reconsider the interactive technology assessment approach to new and emerging technologies. Paper submitted at the Science and Technology in Society Conference in Washington, DC
Vasterling V (2007) Cognitive theory and phenomenology in Arendt’s and Nussbaum’s work on narrative. Hum Stud 30:79–95
Verbeek PP (2006) Ethiek en Technologie. Moreel actorschap en subjectiviteit in een technologische cultuur. Ethisce Perspect 16(3):267–289
Whitesides GM (2003) Science and education for nanoscience and nanotechnology. In: Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology—Improving benefits to humanity. NSET and NSF Springer, Arlington Virginia
Worth S (2006) Narrative knowledge: knowing through storytelling. Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina