Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, M.B. 1990. The wellborn science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Agar, N. 2008. Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Oxford: Wiley.
Appel, J.M. 2012. Toward an ethical eugenics: The case for mandatory preimplantation genetic selection. JONA’S Healthcare Law, Ethics and Regulation 14 (1): 7–13.
Bashford, A. 2010. Epilogue: Where did eugenics go? In The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics, ed. A. Bashford and P. Levine, 539–558. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bashford, A., and P. Levine (eds.). 2010. The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, R. 2014. When intuition is not enough. Why the principle of procreative beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision. Bioethics 28 (9): 447–455.
Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling passions: A theory of practical reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bouffard, C., S. Viville, and B.M. Knoppers. 2009. Genetic diagnosis of embryos: clear explanation, not rhetoric, is needed. Canadian Medical Association Journal 181 (6–7): 387–391.
Bourne, H., T. Douglas, and J. Savulescu. 2012. Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis. Monash Bioethics Review 30 (2): 29–48.
Brock, D.W. 2005. Shaping future children: Parental rights and societal interests. Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4): 377–398.
Brokowski, C., M. Pollack, and R. Pollack. 2015. Cutting eugenics out of CRISPR-Cas9. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal 6 (3–4): 263–279.
Bruni, T., M. Mameli, G. Pravettoni, and G. Boniolo. 2012. Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in Veneto (Italy): an ethical analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3): 321–328.
Buchanan, A. 2007. Institutions, beliefs and ethics: Eugenics as a case study. Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 22–45.
Buchanan, A., D.W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2001. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camporesi, S. 2014. From bench to bedside, to track & field: The context of enhancement and its ethical relevance. San Francisco: University of California Medical Humanities Press.
Caplan, A.L., G. McGee, and D. Magnus. 1999. What is immoral about eugenics? Western Journal of Medicine 171 (5–6): 335–337.
Cavaliere, G., and J. Harris. 2018. Reproductive freedom and destiny: how new technologies are influencing ethics and policy of abortion. In Handbook of ethics and public policy, ed. A. Lever and A. Poama. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 978-1138201279.
Cavaliere, G. 2018. Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2): 215–225.
Crossley, M., and L. Shepherd. 2003. Genes and disability: questions at the crossroads. Florida State University Review 30: 13–20.
Darnovsky, M. 2004. Revisiting sex selection: the growing popularity of new sex selection methods revives an old debate. Genewatch: A Bulletin of the Committee for Responsible Genetics 17 (1): 1–7.
de Melo-Martín, I. 2016. Rethinking reprogenetics: Enhancing ethical analyses of reprogenetic technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dolgin, J. L. 2004. Method, mediations, and the moral dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Cumberland Law Review 35 (3): 519–542.
Edwards, S.D. 2004. Disability, identity and the “expressivist objection”. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4): 418–420.
Ekberg, M. 2007. The old eugenics and the new genetics compared. Social History of Medicine 20 (3): 581–593.
Franklin, S., and C. Roberts. 2006. Born and made: An ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Garland-Thomson, R. 2012. The case for conserving disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (3): 339–355.
Gillon, R. 1998. Eugenics, contraception, abortion and ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4): 219.
Gyngell, C., and M. Selgelid. 2016. Twenty-first century eugenics. In The Oxford handbook of reproductive ethics, ed. L. Francis, 141–158. New York: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haidt, J., and J. Baron. 1996. Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology 26 (2): 201–218.
Haidt, J., and F. Björklund. 2007. Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In Moral psychology. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity, vol. 2, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong, 181–217. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harris, J. 1992. Wonderwoman and Superman: The ethics of human biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Häyry, M. 2008. The historical idea of a better race. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (1): 1–28.
Jasanoff, S., J.B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2015. CRISPR democracy: Gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology 32 (1): 37.
Jeffreys, S. 2012. The transgendering of children: Gender eugenics. Women’s Studies International Forum 35 (5): 384–393.
Kevles, D.J. 1985. In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a democratic society. New York: Prometheus Books.
Koch, L. 2004. The meaning of eugenics: Reflections on the government of genetic knowledge in the past and the present. Science in Context 17 (3): 315–331.
Koch, L. 2006a. Past futures: on the conceptual history of eugenics: A social technology of the past. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 329–344.
Koch, T. 2006b. Bioethics as ideology: Conditional and unconditional values. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3): 251–267.
Lakoff, G. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lombardo, P.A. 2008. Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Lombardo, P.A. 2011. A century of eugenics in America: from the Indiana experiment to the human genome era. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MacKellar, C., and C. Bechtel (eds.). 2014. The ethics of the new eugenics. New York: Berghahn.
Mehlman, M.J. 2011. Modern eugenics and the law. In A century of eugenics in America: From the Indiana experiment to the human genome era, ed. P.A. Lombardo, 218–241. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Meloni, M. 2016. Political biology: Science and social values in human heredity from eugenics to epigenetics. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mittra, J. 2007. Marginalising ‘eugenic anxiety’ through a rhetoric of ‘liberal choice’: A critique of the House of Commons Select Committee Report on reproductive technologies. New Genetics and Society 26 (2): 159–179.
O’Keefe, M., S. Perrault, J. Halpern, L. Ikemoto, M. Yarborough, and North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences. 2015. “Editing” genes: A case study about how language matters in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12): 3–10.
Parens, E., and A. Asch. 2003. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews 9 (1): 40–47.
Paul, D.B. 1992. Eugenic anxieties, social realities, and political choices. Social Research 59 (3): 663–683.
Paul, D.B. 1998. The politics of heredity: Essays on eugenics, biomedicine, and the nature-nurture debate. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Paul, D. 2006. Darwin, social Darwinism, and eugenics. In The Cambridge companion to Darwin, 2nd ed, ed. J. Hodge and G. Radick, 219–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petrinovich, L., and P. O’Neill. 1996. Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology 17 (3): 145–171.
Ravitsky, V., S. Birko, and R. Dupras-Leduc. 2015. The “three-parent baby”: A case study of how language frames the ethical debate regarding an emerging technology. The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12): 57–60.
Roberts, D.E. 1997. Killing the black body. Race, reproduction and the meaning of liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.
Roberts, D.E. 2009. Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34 (4): 783–804.
Roberts, D.E. 2015. Can research on the genetics of intelligence be “socially neutral”? Hastings Center Report 45 (1): 50–53.
Robertson, J.A. 2005. Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10: 97–101.
Rosen, C. 2003. Eugenics: Sacred and profane. The New Atlantis 2: 79–89.
Russell, C. 2010. The limits of liberal choice: Racial selection and reprogenetics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1): 97–108.
Sandel, M.J. 2004. The case against perfection, what’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. The Atlantic Monthly 292 (3): 51–62.
Santosuosso, A., V. Sellaroli, and E. Fabio. 2007. What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6): 342–344.
Savulescu, J. 2005. New breeds of humans: The moral obligation to enhance. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10: 36–39.
Savulescu, J., and N. Bostrom (eds.). 2009. Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savulescu, J., and G. Kahane. 2009. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23 (5): 274–290.
Schneider, W. 1990. The eugenics movement in France, 1890–1940. In The wellborn science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, ed. M. Adams, 69–109. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scott, R. 2006. Choosing between possible lives: legal and ethical issues in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1): 153–178.
Scully, J.L. 2008. Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine. Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (10): 797–802.
Selgelid, M.J. 2014. Moderate eugenics and human enhancement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1): 3–12.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2007. Framing moral intuitions. In Moral psychology. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity, vol. 2, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong, 47–76. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sparrow, R. 2008. Genes, identity, and the expressivist critique. In The sorting society: the ethics of genetic screening and therapy, ed. L. Skene and J. Thompson, 111–132. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, L. 1953. Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tong, R. 2013. Ethical concerns about genetic testing and screening. North Carolina Medical Journal 74 (6): 522–525.
Walker, M. 2010. In defense of the Genetic Virtue Program: A rejoinder. Politics and the Life Sciences 29 (1): 90–96.
Wilkinson, S. 2008. “Eugenics talk” and the language of bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6): 467–471.
Wilkinson, S. 2010. Choosing tomorrow’s children: the ethics of selective reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, S., and E. Garrard. 2013. Eugenics and the ethics of selective reproduction. Keele: Keele University.
Wright, R. 1994. The moral animal. New York: Pantheon.