Looking for ‘System Integrity’ in Cognitive Epidemiology

Gerontology - Tập 58 Số 6 - Trang 545-553 - 2012
Ian J. Deary1
1Centre for Cognitive Ageing & Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In the last decade, an increasing body of empirical evidence has gathered to establish an association between higher cognitive ability in youth and later mortality, less morbidity and better health. This field of research is known as cognitive epidemiology. The causes of these associations are not understood. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Among the possible explanations for the associations is the suggestion that they might, in part, be accounted for by general bodily ‘system integrity’. That is, scoring well on cognitive ability tests might be an indicator of a more general tendency for complex systems in the body to be efficient. The construct of system integrity is critically assessed. <b><i>Method:</i></b> This viewpoint provides a critical presentation and an empirical and theoretical evaluation of the construct of system integrity as it is used in cognitive epidemiology. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A precedent of the system integrity suggestion is discovered. The empirical tests of the system integrity idea to date are critically evaluated. Other possible routes to testing system integrity are suggested. There is a critical re-evaluation of the idea and other, related concepts. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The construct of system integrity is distinct from related constructs. It is still underdeveloped theoretically, and undertested empirically within cognitive epidemiology.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093%2Fije%2Fdyq190

10.1136%2Fbmj.322.7290.819

10.1097%2FPSY.0b013e3181a63b2e

10.1037%2F0882-7974.9.3.339

10.1159%2F000052825

10.1159%2F000279754

10.1016%2FS0149-7634%2802%2900073-8

10.1037%2F0882-7974.16.4.588

10.1159%2F000022068

10.1017%2FS1355617711000993

10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004

10.1016%2FS0160-2896%2801%2900062-9

10.1037%2F%2F0033-295X.103.3.403

10.1037%2Fa0021361

10.1037%2Fa0017750

10.1111%2Fj.0956-7976.2005.00781.x

10.1097%2F01.psy.0000195867.66643.0f

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2009.02.001

10.1023%2FB%3ABEGE.0000009475.35287.9d

10.1093%2Fgeronb%2Fgbr059

10.1097%2FPSY.0b013e31818a1620

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2010.04.003

10.1007%2Fs00125-007-0908-5

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2008.09.004

10.1002%2Fajhb.21018

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2010.03.002

10.1093%2Fije%2Fdyq072

10.1038%2Fmp.2011.85

10.1002%2Fper.629

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2009.03.008

10.1037%2F0033-295X.91.2.216

10.1016%2Fj.intell.2008.12.002

10.1093%2Fgeronb%2Fgbr037

10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2008.02171.x