Kết quả dài hạn của phẫu thuật nội soi bằng robot so với phẫu thuật nội soi truyền thống cho ung thư trực tràng: phân tích hồi cứu tại một trung tâm, sử dụng điểm propensity
Tóm tắt
Mặc dù kết quả ngắn hạn của phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ bởi robot (RALS) cho ung thư trực tràng đã được biết đến rõ ràng, nhưng kết quả ung thư dài hạn của RALS so với phẫu thuật nội soi truyền thống (CLS) vẫn chưa rõ ràng. Nghiên cứu này nhằm so sánh các kết quả dài hạn của RALS và CLS trong điều trị ung thư trực tràng bằng cách sử dụng phương pháp ghép điểm propensity. Nghiên cứu hồi cứu này bao gồm 185 bệnh nhân mắc ung thư trực tràng giai đoạn I–III đã trải qua phẫu thuật cắt bỏ triệt để tại viện chúng tôi từ năm 2010 đến 2019. Các phân tích điểm propensity được thực hiện với tỷ lệ sống sót tổng thể (OS) sau 3 năm và tỷ lệ sống không tái phát (RFS) là các mục tiêu chính. Sau khi ghép trường hợp, tỷ lệ OS và RFS sau 3 năm lần lượt là 86.5% và 77.9% trong nhóm CLS và 98.4% và 88.5% trong nhóm RALS. Mặc dù không có sự khác biệt có ý nghĩa thống kê về OS (
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5
van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0
Park JW, Kang SB, Hao J, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Jeong SY, Oh JH (2021) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00094-7
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414882
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7219
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4266-y
Matsuyama T, Endo H, Yamamoto H, Takemasa I, Uehara K, Hanai T, Miyata H, Kimura T, Hasegawa H, Kakeji Y, Inomata M, Kitagawa Y, Kinugasa Y (2021) Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the national clinical database in Japan. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Lee HJ, Woo IT, Park IK (2018) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32:2466–2473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5948-4
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y (2016) Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today 46:957–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9752-z
Debakey Y, Zaghloul A, Farag A, Mahmoud A, Elattar I (2018) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience. RCT Minim Invasive Surg 2018:5836562. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5836562
Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Nam BH, Sohn DK, Oh JH (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002321
Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000613
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Furuatni A, Manabe S, Yamaoka Y, Hino H (2018) Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3153-0
Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, Koide Y, Matsuoka H, Tajima Y, Endo T, Mizuno M, Chong Y, Maeda K, Uyama I (2020) Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Surg Today 50:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01874-x
Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, Roh YE, Lee JW, Kwak HD, Kwak JM, Kim SH (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000770
Baik SH, Kim NK, Lim DR, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY (2013) Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2625–2632. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2895-8
Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine 94:e522. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000000522
Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG, Gray R, Benedetti JK, Buyse M, Labianca R, Seitz JF, O’Callaghan CJ, Francini G, Grothey A, O’Connell M, Catalano PJ, Blanke CD, Kerr D, Green E, Wolmark N, Andre T, Goldberg RM, De Gramont A (2005) Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clinical Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:8664–8670. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.6071
Breugom AJ, Swets M, Bosset JF, Collette L, Sainato A, Cionini L, Glynne-Jones R, Counsell N, Bastiaannet E, van den Broek CB, Liefers GJ, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery for patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 16:200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71199-4
Yamaoka Y, Kagawa H, Shiomi A, Yamakawa Y, Hino H, Manabe S, Kinugasa Y (2021) Robotic-assisted surgery may be a useful approach to protect urinary function in the modern era of diverse surgical approaches for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 35:1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07509-4
Lei Y, Jiang J, Zhu S, Yi B, Li J (2022) Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 26:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02546-0