Long‐term monitoring of common spadefoot toad activity in a European steppe using barn owl pellets

Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki - 2021
Lukas Landler1, Katharina Stefke2
1Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33/I, Vienna, 1180, Austria
2Natural History Museum Vienna, Mammal Collection, Burgring 7, Wien, 1010, Austria

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundOne third of the worldwide amphibian species are threatened, therefore, efficient monitoring efforts are needed. Amphibians which adopt a hidden lifestyle, such as the common spadefoot toad, are often missed with standard surveying efforts. Spadefoot toads can be identified in regurgitated pellets of the barn owl, which provides an effective way to estimate toad activity. In our study we analyzed frequency of spadefoot toad remains from 2004 to 2016 in a steppe landscape in eastern Austria.MethodsWe used an automated model selection procedure together with a GLM analysis using a zero inflated error Poisson distribution, to analyze the presence ofPelobates fuscusin barn owl pellets. All analyses were done in the statistical software R, and the scripts to reproduce our results are available within this publication. Our approach may provide a template for other researchers to use for their own pellet data.ConclusionsOur analysis suggested that activity of the common spadefoot toad is mainly influenced by rainfalls, while time of the year and temperature had small but significant effects. Interestingly, our data confirmed the possibility of a second breeding period in summer, triggered by heavy rainfalls. There were no indications for a population decrease in the observed years and locations. Our study shows that barn owl pellets can be used effectivley to assess pelobatid activity in an area. This might constitute a useful monitoring tool for conservation management for amphibians.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Vié J-C, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN. Wildlife in a changing world: an analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of threatened species. Gland: IUCN; 2009. 180 p.

IUCN. The IUCN red list of threatened species. 2015.

Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science. 2007;318:1775–7.

Cohen JM, Civitello DJ, Venesky MD, McMahon TA, Rohr JR. An interaction between climate change and infectious disease drove widespread amphibian declines. Glob Change Biol. 2019;25:927–37.

Fisher MC, Garner TWJ. Chytrid fungi and global amphibian declines. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:332–43.

Gollmann G. Rote Liste der in Österreich gefährdeten Lurche (Amphibia) und Kriechtiere (Reptilia). In: Rote Listen gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs. Grüne Reihe; 2007. p. 39–62.

Cabela A, Grillitsch H, Tiedemann F. Rote Liste ausgewählter Tiergruppen Niederösterreichs-Lurche und Kriechtiere. Amphib Reptil. 1997;1:2.

Borkin LJ, Litvinchuk SN, Rosanov JM, Khalturin MD, Lada GA, Borissovsky AG, et al. New data on the distribution of two cryptic forms of the common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) in Eastern Europe. Russ J Herpetol. 2003;10:111–8.

Litvinchuk SN, Crottini A, Federici S, De Pous P, Donaire D, Andreone F, et al. Phylogeographic patterns of genetic diversity in the common spadefoot toad, Pelobates fuscus (Anura: Pelobatidae), reveals evolutionary history, postglacial range expansion and secondary contact. Org Divers Evol. 2013;13:433–51.

Dufresnes C, Strachinis I, Suriadna N, Mykytynets G, Cogălniceanu D, Székely P, et al. Phylogeography of a cryptic speciation continuum in Eurasian spadefoot toads (Pelobates). Mol Ecol. 2019;28:3257–70.

Speybroeck J, Beukema W, Dufresnes C, Fritz U, Jablonski D, Lymberakis P, et al. Species list of the European herpetofauna – 2020 update by the Taxonomic Committee of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica. Amphib-Reptil. 2020;41:139–89.

Dufresnes C, Strachinis I, Tzoras E, Litvinchuk SN, Denoël M. Call a spade a spade: taxonomy and distribution of Pelobates, with description of a new Balkan endemic. ZooKeys. 2019;859:131–58.

Van Gelder JJ, Hoedemaekers HCM. Sound Activity and Migration During the Breeding Period of Rana temporaria L, R arvalis Nilsson, Pelobates fuscus Laur. and Rana esculenta L. J Anim Ecol. 1971;40:559–68.

Hels T. Population dynamics in a Danish metapopulation of spadefoot toads Pelobates fuscus. Ecography. 2002;25:303–13.

Nyström P, Birkedal L, Dahlberg C, Brönmark C. The declining spadefoot toad Pelobates fuscus: calling site choice and conservation. Ecography. 2002;25:488–98.

Jahn K. Beobachtungen zur Eingrabetiefe von Pelobates fuscus während der Laichzeit. Z Für Feldherpetologie. 1997;4:165–72.

Carisio L, Sacchi R, Seglie D, Sindaco R. Habitat selection in the fossorial toad Pelobates fuscus insubricus (Amphibia: Pelobatidae): does the soil affect species occurrence? Acta Herpetol. 2014;9:51–9.

Roulin A, Dubey S. Amphibians in the diet of European barn owls. Bird Study. 2013;60:264–9.

Avenant NL. Barn owl pellets: a useful tool for monitoring small mammal communities. Belg J Zool. 2005;135:39–43.

Stefke K, Landler L. Long-term monitoring of rodent and shrew communities in a biodiversity hot-spot in Austria using barn owl (Tyto alba) pellets. Acta Oecol. 2020;109:103660.

Csaplovics E. Der Schilfgürtel des Neusiedler Sees. Österr Wasser- Abfallwirtsch. 2019;71:11–2.

März R, Banz K. Gewöll- und Rupfungskunde. 3rd ed. Berlin: Akademischer Verlag; 1987.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

Pewsey A, Neuhäuser M, Ruxton GD. Circular statistics in R. Oxford: University Press; 2013.

Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R Journal. 2017;9:378–400.

Voeten CC. Buildmer: stepwise elimination and term reordering for mixed-effects regression. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=buildmer.

Lüdecke D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.8.3; 2020.

Lüdecke D. ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3:772.

Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2016.

Jehle R, Hoedl W, Thonke A. Structure and dynamics of central European amphibian populations: a comparison between Triturus dobrogicus (Amphibia, Urodela) and Pelobates fuscus (Amphibia, Anura). Aust J Ecol. 1995;20:362–6.

Yermokhin MV, Tabachishin VG, Ivanov GA. Spawning migration phenology of the spadefoot toad Pelobates fuscus (Pelobatidae, Amphibia) in the valley of the Medveditsa River (Saratov oblast). Biol Bull. 2015;42:931–6.

Sacher P. Mehrjährige Beobachtungen an einer Population der Knoblauchkröte (Pelobates fuscus). Hercynia-Ökol Umw Mitteleur. 1987;24:142–52.

Eggert C, Guyétant R. Reproductive behaviour of spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus): daily sex ratios and males’ tactics, ages, and physical condition. Can J Zool. 2003;81:46–51.

Nicoara A, Nicoara M. Surveying an isolated population of Pelobates fuscus (Anura, Amphibia) in the urban area of the town of Iasi (Romania). Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud. 2008;37:61–9.

D’Amen M, Bombi P, Pearman PB, Schmatz DR, Zimmermann NE, Bologna MA. Will climate change reduce the efficacy of protected areas for amphibian conservation in Italy? Biol Conserv. 2011;144:989–97.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki

Thông tin tác giả