Local authority investment property – a virtual reality?

Property Management - 1995
NeilMartindale1
1Principal Valuer within the Property Department of the London Borough of Waltham Forest, London, UK.

Tóm tắt

The total capital value of the tenanted non‐residential property of English and Welsh local authorities is immense, more even than the total holdings of the top eight, UK‐based, property companies. However, while property investment companies own tenanted property for financial returns, the primary reason for its ownership by local authorities is far from clear. A survey of councils revealed that while many considered much of their tenanted non‐residential property was held for investment, it rarely formed part of wider financial investment aims. Moreover, investment objectives and management strategies were not clearly stated, prioritized, effected, or measurable. These failings were true of both individual properties and overall portfolios. Where property does not primarily meet a function of a statutory local authority, it must at least be regarded as non‐operational. The opportunity for a council to create a credible investment property portfolio is markedly restricted by the absence of the statutory objective of “property investment”. If, after review, property remains unsuited for assisting any real function of local government, it should be classed as surplus. It is proposed that local authority investment property may therefore justifiably be considered surplus to the functional objectives and requirements of a statutory local authority. If also unsuitable for operational use, such property should be programmed for disposal.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Lennox, K, “Croydon pioneers”, Estate Gazette, 9426, 2 July 1994.

2. Tyler, G “Landbank due for overhaul”, Estate Times, 8 July 1994, p. 22.

3. Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE), Our Heritage – Property Management in a Local Authority, SOLACE, London, 1986.

4. Association of District Councils (ADC), Property Management in District Councils – A Good Practice Guide, ADC, London, 1990.

5. Currie, D. and Scott, A., The Place of Property in the UK Economy, London Business School, London, 1991, p.4.

6. Audit Commission (AC), Local Authority Property Management Handbook, HMSO, London, 1988.

7. Debenham Tewson Research (DTR), The Role of Property‐Managing the Cost and Releasing the value , DTR, London, 1992, p. 2.

8. National Audit Office (NAO), Estates Management in the National Health Service, HMSO, London, 1988.

9. Roberts, B. “Property management in a local authority”, Property Management, Vol. 1 No. 3, 1983, pp. 223‐8.

10. Wootten, B. “Portfolio management of council property”, Municipal Journal, February 1989.

11. Martindale, N. “Local authorities as landlords of tenanted non‐residential property”, unpublished research, University of East London, 1994.

12. National Audit Office (NAO), The Crown Estate, HMSO, London, 1988, p. 1.

13. Bryne, T., Local Government in Britain, Penguin, London, 1992.

14. Local Government Act 1972, section 120 and section 13.

15. Local Government Act 1972, section 123 and section 27, as amended by Local Government Planning and Land Act 1980.

16. Department of the Environment (DoE), Disposal of Land for Less than Best Consideration that Can Reasonably Be Obtained – Guidance for Authorities, circ. 6/93, HMSO, London, 1993.

17. Local Authorities (Capital Finance) (Approved Investments) Regulations, SI 1990, 426 and Local Authorities (Capital Finance) Regulations, SI 1990, 432. and Local Government and Housing Act 1989.

18. Avis, M. Gibson, V. and Watt, J., Managing Operational Property, University of Reading, 1989.

19. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Manual of Valuation Guidance Notes, RICS, London, October 1993,VGN8A , p. 4.

20. Thorncroft, M. The Principles of Estate Management, College of Estate Management, London, 1965, p. 350.

21. Britton, W. Connellan, O. and Crofts, M., The Economic, Efficient and Effective Management of Public Authority Landed Estates, Surrey County Council and Kingston Polytechnic, Kingston, 1989.

22. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Property Management in Local Authorities: Evidence to the Audit Commission, RICS, London, p. 12.

23. Searle, B. “Valuation and estate management‐valuing your assets”. Paper presented at the conference The Effective Management of Land and Resources, RICS, London, 1987.

24. British Property Federation, “Local authority property a management overview”, Journal of the British Property Federation, February 1988, p. 12.

25. Audit Commission (AC), Local Authority Property – A Management Overview, HMSO, London, 1988.

26. Anon, “Sadly underused assets”, Estates Gazette, 8806, 13 February 1988, p. 1.

27. Kooiman, J. and Eliassen, K., “Public management in Europe”, in Brovetto, P., Holzer, R. and Kakabadse, A. (Eds), Management Development and the Public Sector, a European Perspective, Gower, Aldershot, 1988 , pp. 62‐72.

28. Arnison, C “Positive property management – a new prospectus”, Property Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, 1984, pp. 152‐8.

29. Harrow, J. and Willcocks, L., “Risk and the public service manager”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, 1990, pp. 61‐4.

30. Cook, G. “Local authorities and industrial property markets”, Property Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, 1989, pp. 3‐12.

31. Fothergill, S. Monk, S. and Parry, M., Property and Industrial Development, Hutchinson, London, 1987.

32. Mason, A. “Industrial property letting: lessons from the GLC′s policies and experiences”, Local Economy, Vol. 1 No. 3, 1986, pp. 61‐9.

33. Roberts, B. “Managing the corporate estate of Leicester City Council”, Property Management, Vol. 2No. 3, 1984, pp. 198‐205.

34. Knight, T. “Treasury management – investing within a framework”, Public Finance and Accountancy, 13 December 1991, pp. 13‐4.

35. Fuller Peiser, “Councils ‘drag heels’ over asset registers”, Estates Gazette, 9305, 6 February 1993, p.2.

36. Edward Erdman, Property Asset Registers – A National Survey of the Local Authority Response to Implementation, Edward Erdman, London, 1992.

37. Richardson, G. “Asset shortcomings”, Local Government Chronicle Supplement, 11 June 1993, p. 34 .

38. Property Week, “Company that is master of all it surveys”, Property Week, 1 December 1994, p. 32.

39. “Local authorities raise £13 billion”, Chartered Surveyor Weekly (CSW), 6 January 1994, p.4.

40. Roberts, J. “Portfolio reviewed by city corporation”, Estates Times, 26 February 1993, p. 5.

41. Audit Commission (AC), Citizen′s Charter Indicators‐Charting a Course, HMSO, London, 1993.

42. Gasson, C. “Tomorrow′s just another pay day”, Local Government Chronicle Supplement, No. 6, November1992, pp. 3‐4.

43. “Council′s guarantee was void!”, Credit Suisse v. Allerdale District Council), The Independent, 17 June1994.

44. “Council acted within statutory powers”, Credit Suisse v. Waltham Forest London Borough Council), The Times, 8 November 1994.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Property Management

Thông tin tác giả