Rationality địa phương và định hướng của khoa học: Sự phục hồi ‘nội dung của khám phá’

Baynes, K.et al. (eds.): 1987,After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London. Dorling, J. (1973, ‘Demonstrative Induction: Its Significant Role in the History of Physics’.Philosophy of Science 40, 360–372. Dorling, J.: 1987, ‘Einstein's Methodology of Discovery was Newtonian Deduction from the Phenomena’ (preprint of paper presented at the symposium ‘Newton's Philosophical Legacy’, Nijmegen). Fischer, K.: 1983, ‘Rationale Heuristik — Die Funktion der Kritik im “Context of Discovery’”,Zeitschrift f. allg. Wissenschaftstheorie 14, 234–272. Fine, A. and Leplin, J. (eds.): 1988,PSA 1988, Vol. 1, PSA, East Lansing. Fine, A. and Leplin, J. (eds.): 1989,PSA 1988, Vol. 2, PSA, East Lansing. FLögl, C. F.: 1760,Einleitung in die Erfindungskunst, Breslau und Leipzig. Gillies, D. A.: 1989, ‘Non-Bayesian Confirmation Theory and the Principle of Explanatory Surplus’, in Fine and Leplin (eds.), 1989, 381–392. Grmek, M. D.et al.: 1981,On Scientific Discovery: The Erice Lectures 1977, Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston/London. Gutting, G.: 1980, ‘Science as Discovery’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34, 26–48. Howson, C.: 1989, ‘Accommodation, Prediction and Bayesian Confirmation Theory’, in Fine and Leplin (eds.), 381–392. Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1987, ‘Context of Discovery and Context of Justification’,Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 18, 501–515. Kirschenmann, P. P.: 1988, ‘Multiple Discoveries and What They Show-About Scientist and Society, and According to Wittgenstein’, inReports of the 12th International Wittgenstein Symposium, O. Weinbergeret al. (eds.), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 177–181. Kirschenmann, P. P.: 1989, ‘The Possibility of Heuristics: Universal versus Local Rationality in Science’, inPhilosophy and Natural Science: Borderline Questions, P. Weingartner, G. Schurz (eds.), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 150–155. Kisiel, T.: 1980, ‘Ars Inveniendi: A Classical Source for Contemporary Philosophy of Science’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34, 130–154. Laudan, L.: 1980, ‘Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?’, in Nickles (ed.) (1980a), 173–183. Lugg, A.: 1985, ‘The Process of Discovery’,Philosophy of Science 52, 207–220. Maher, P.: 1988, ‘Prediction, Accommodation and the Logic of Discovery’, in Fine and Leplin (eds.), 1988, 273–285. Matuschka, M. W. v.: 1985, ‘Heuristik — Wortgeschichte und historische Entwicklung’,Philosophia Naturalis 22, 416–424. Nauta, L. W.: 1977, ‘Context of Discovery and Context of Justification’,Kennis en Methode 1, 5–20. Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980a,Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston/London Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980b,Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston/London Nickles, T. (ed.): 1985, ‘Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate’,Philosphy of Science 52, 177–206. Nickles, T. (ed.): 1987, ‘Lakatosian Heuristics and Epistemic Support’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 38, 181–205. Nicles, T. (ed.): 1988, ‘Reconstructing Science: Discovery and Experiment’, inTheory and Experiment, D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegem (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 33–53 Nickles, T. (ed.): 1989a, ‘Heuristic Appraisal: A Proposal’,Social Epistemology 3, 175–188 Nickles, T. (ed.): 1989b, ‘Truth or Consequences? Generative Versus Consequential Justification in Science’, in Fine and Leplin (eds.), 1989, 393–405 Popper, K. R.: 1968,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper and Row, New York and Evanston. Reichenbach, H.: 1961,Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, U. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, (1st ed. 1938) Schipper, F.: 1987, ‘Williams Whewell's Wetenschapsfilosofie en Heuristiek’,Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 79, 192–209 Zytkow, J. M. and Simon, H. A.: 1988, ‘Normative Systems of Discovery and Logic of Search’,Synthese 74, 65–90