Local Peoples’ Appreciation on and Contribution to Conservation of Peatland Swamp Forests: Experience from Peninsular Malaysia
Tóm tắt
Peatland swamp forests (PSF) deliver a range of beneficial, but often undervalued ecosystem services. In this paper we examined local peoples’ appreciation on the values of PSF and their contribution to conservation. The study was carried out by interviewing 100 respondents living in adjacent to North Selangor PSF and holding three focus group discussions and a few key-informants’ interviews following participatory rural appraisal and contingent valuation methods. Respondents appreciated PSF for direct values including timber, non-timber forest products, source of fish, and water for agriculture. They reported environmental values of PSF like flood prevention, biodiversity conservation, fresh air, soil fertility, perennial water source, and reduction of storm damages. They also reported several health and cultural benefits including sources of medicinal plants, fresh food, and agro-tourism. The monetary values of some benefits were estimated as USD 128/month/family (for fish), USD 128/month/family (agro-tourism) and USD 159,070/year (irrigation). Although direct benefits from PSF were minimal, respondents sincerely wanted to contribute to PSF conservation through participation in community-based rehabilitation project, patrolling and fire protection, tree planting, cash donation, supplying seedlings, and joining in awareness creation programme. The intrinsic values and peoples’ enthusiasm for PSF conservation suggest a community-based approach for sustainable PSF management.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abram NK, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting RK, Wells JA, Gaveau D, Pellier A-S, Mengersen K (2014) Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst Serv 7:116–127
Astiani D, Burhanuddin B, Curran LM, Mujiman M, Salim R (2017) Effects of drainage ditches on water table level, soil conditions and tree growth of degraded peatland forests in west Kalimantan. Indones J For Res 4(1):15–25
Bakhtiari F, Jacobsen JB, Strange N, Helles F (2014) Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Glob Ecol Conserv 1:27–42
Cheng SH, Ahlroth S, Onder S, Shyamsundar P, Garside R, Kristjanson P, McKinnon MC, Miller DC (2017) What is the evidence for the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation? A systematic map protocol. Environ Evid 6:10. doi:10.1186/s13750-017-0088-9
Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2009) Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Science 106(42):17667–17670
Chinangwa L, Pullin AS, Hockley N (2016) Livelihoods and welfare impacts of forest comanagement. Int J For Res 2016(5847068):12. doi:10.1155/2016/5847068
Evers E, Yule CM, Padfield R, O’Reilly P, Varkkey H (2017) Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands – implications for policies and management. Glob Chang Biol 23:534–549
Fischer A, Young JC (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136:271–282
Fritz-Vietta NVM (2017) What can forest values tell us about human well-being? Insights from two biosphere reserves in Madagascar. Landsc Urban Plan 147:28–37
Galvani AP, Bauchc CT, Anandd M, Singere BH, Levinf SA (2016) Human–environment interactions in population and ecosystem health. PNAS 113(51):14502–14506
GEC (Global Environment Centre) (2013) Conservation and rehabilitation of Raja Musa Forest Reserve. 2011–12 project report, Kula Lumpur
Hayes T, Persha L (2010) Nesting local forestry initiatives: revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. Forest Policy Econ 12:545–553
Heathwaite AL (1990) The effect of drainage on nutrient release from fen peat and its implication for water quality –a laboratory simulation. Water Air Soil Pollut 49:159–173
Isager L, Theilade I, Thomson L (2002) People's participation in forest conservation: considerations and case studies. In: Koskela J, Appanah S, Pedersen AP, Markopoulos MD (eds) Proceedings of the southeast Asian moving workshop on conservation, management and utilization of Forest genetic resources. FORSPA publication no. 31/2002. Online available http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/AC648E/ac648e0i.htm#bm18
Kamri T (2013) Willingness to pay for conservation of natural resources in the Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 101:506–515
Karky BS, Skutsch M (2010) The cost of carbon abatement through community forest management in Nepal Himalaya. Ecol Econ 69:666–672
Laiho R, Pearson M (2016) Surface peat and its dynamics following drainage - do they facilitate estimation of carbon losses with the C/ash method? Mires and Peat 17(8):1–19
Lampela M, Jauhiainen J, Sarkkola S, Vasander H (2017) Promising native tree species for reforestation of degraded tropical peatlands. For Ecol Manag 394:52–63
Lankiaa T, Neuvonenb M, Poutaa E, Sievänen T (2014) Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland. J For Econ 20:141–160
Lee KH, Hatcher CB (2000) An analyst’s guide to willingness-to-pay for use in cost-benefit analyses. Consum Interes Annu 46:128–133
Lin Y, Wijedasa LS, Chisholm RA (2017) Singapore’s willingness to pay for mitigation of transboundary forest-fire haze from Indonesia. Environ Res Lett 12:024017. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5cf6
Macura B, Zorondo-Rodríguez F, Grau-Satorras M, Demps K, Laval M, Garcia CA, Reyes-García V (2011) Local community attitudes toward forests outside protected areas in India. Impact of legal awareness, trust, and participation. Ecol Soc 16(3):10. doi:10.5751/ES-04242-160310
Makarius CSL, Patrick M, Yonika MN, Goddy JS (2017) Willingness to pay for watershed conservation: are we applying the right paradigm? Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 17:33–45
Medrilzam M, Smith C, Aziz AA, Herbohn J, Dargusch P (2017) Smallholder farmers and the dynamics of degradation of peatland ecosystems in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecol Econ 136:101–113
Miettinen J, Liew CS (2010) Degradation and development of peatlands in peninsular Malaysia and the islands of Sumatra and Borneo since 1990. Land Degrad Dev 2:285–296
Miettinen J, Hooijer A, Shi C, Tollenaar D, Vernimmen R, Chin LS, Malins C, Page S (2012) Extent of industrial plantations on southeast Asian peatlands in 2010 with analysis of historical expansion and future projections. GCB Bioenergy 4:908–918
Miettinen J, Shi C, Liew SC (2016) Land cover distribution in the peatlands of peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo in 2015 with changes since 1990. Glob Ecol Conserv 6:67–78
Miettinen J, Hooijer A, Vernimmen R, Liew SC, Page SE (2017) From carbon sink to carbon source: extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environ Res Lett 12(2):024014. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b6f
Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the future, Washington
Murugan P, Israel F (2017) Impact of Forest carbon sequestration initiative on community assets: the case of assisted natural regeneration project in Humbo, southwestern Ethiopia. Afr Stud Q 17(1):23–42
Nagiah C, Azmi R (2012) A review of smallholder oil palm production: challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainability – a Malaysian perspective. J Oil Palm Environ 3:114–120
Nath TK, Jashimuddin M, Inoue M (2016) Community based forest management in Bangladesh. Springer International Publishers, Switzerland
Newton P, Oldekop JA, Brodnig G, Karna BK, Agrawal A (2016) Carbon, biodiversity, and livelihoods in forest commons: synergies, trade-offs, and implications for REDD+. Environ Res Lett 11:044017. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044017
Ninan KN, Inoue M (2013) Valuing forest ecosystem services: case study of a forest reserve in Japan. Ecosyst Serv 5:78–87
Orchard SE, Lindsay C, Stringer C, Quinn H (2015) Impacts of aquaculture on social networks in the mangrove systems of northern Vietnam. Ocean Coast Manag 114:1–10
Page SE, Baird AJ (2016) Peatlands and global change: response and resilience. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:35–57
Page SE, Morrison R, Malins C, Hooijer A, Rieley JO, Jauhiainen J (2011) Review of peat surface greenhouse gas emissions from oil palm plantations in Southeast Asia (ICCT white paper 15). International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington
Paletto A, De Meo I, Cantiani MG, Maino F (2013) Social perceptions and Forest management strategies in an Italian alpine community. Mt Res Dev 33(2):152–160
Palmer CA (2003) An overview of environmental ethics. In: Light A, Rolston H (eds) Environmental ethics: an anthology. Blackwell philosophy anthologies, Oxford, pp 15–37
Paolisso M (2002) Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: a cultural model for understanding watermen’s reasoning about blue crab management. Hum Organ 61:226–239
Persha L, Agrawal A, Chhatre A (2011) Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 331:1606–1608
Posa MRC, Wijedasa LS, Corlett RT (2011) Biodiversity and conservation of tropical peat swamp forests. Bioscience 61(1):49–57
Prospere K, McLaren P, Wilson B (2016) Characterizing the status (disturbed, hybrid or novel) of swamp Forest fragments in a Caribbean Ramsar wetland: the impact of anthropogenic degradation and invasive plant species. Environ Manag 58:655–681
Ritzema H, Mohamed M, Page S, Limin S, Wösten H (2006) Capacity building for sustainable management of peatlands in the humid tropics: from research to application. Workshop proceedings on monitoring and evaluation of capacity development strategies in agricultural water management. IPTRID, Rome, pp 73–86
Schelhas J, Pfeffer MJ (2009) When global environmentalism meets local livelihoods: policy and management lessons. Conserv Lett 2:278–285
Schrier-Uijl AP, Silvius M, Parish F, Lim KH, Rosediana S, Anshari G (2013) Environmental and social impacts of oil palm cultivation on tropical peat – a scientific review. Roundtable on sustainable palm oil (RSPO), Kuala Lumpur
Selangor State Forestry Department (2014) Integrated Management Plan for North Selangor Peat Swamp Forest, vol 1. Selangor State Forestry Department, Malaysia, pp 2014–2023
Toriman ME, Mokhtar M (2012) Irrigation: types, sources and problems in Malaysia. In: Lee TS (ed) Irrigation systems and practices in challenging environments. Chapter 17, Intech open, Croatia. doi:10.5772/29710
Uda SK, Hein L, Sumarga E (2017) Towards sustainable management of Indonesian tropical peatlands. Wetl Ecol Manag. doi:10.1007/s11273-017-9544-0
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006) Malaysia’s peat swamp forests: conservation and sustainable use. UNDP, Kuala Lumpur
van Beek CL, Droogers P, van Hardeveld HA, van den Eertwegh GAPH, Velthof GL, Oenema O (2007) Leaching of solutes from an intensively managed peat soil to surface water. Water Air Soil Pollut 182:291–301
Wetlands International (2010) A quick scan of peatlands in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya, Wetlands International Malaysia
Yogo UT (2014) Trust and the willingness to contribute to environmental goods in selected African countries. Environ Dev Econ 20:650–672
Yule CM (2010) Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in indo-Malayan peat swamp forests. Biodivers Conserv 19:393–409